arrow left
arrow right
  • STATE OF OHIO vs ERIC DEMETRUS CHASE ASSAULT (PO) (2903.13(A)(PO)) document preview
  • STATE OF OHIO vs ERIC DEMETRUS CHASE ASSAULT (PO) (2903.13(A)(PO)) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Fit. ( (ic USURT CF Cort OM opr o PLAS as 2012 FEB 29 AM 9: 10 Mant ‘of bas MERY CO. OHIO IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO THE STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. Ww CRB36U CR DIST Plaintiff, “VS: MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE Qa Cho9 Defendant. Now comes the Prosecuting Attorney Q Detense attorney OA (check one) and moves the Court fora continuance in the within matter for the following reasons: chase ch COA Det idant's Attorney ENTRY This matter came before the Court on the Motion of: ' Prosecuting Attorney) Defendant's attorneykA (check one) for a continuance, an upon due consideration of good cause, the Court hereby does grant said continuance. It is the further order of the Court that this matter be re-set from Dba la to Sica Jugge O COPIES: Defendant's Attorney Prosecutor Caseflow Services 9/6/90