arrow left
arrow right
  • STATE OF OHIO vs ERIC DEMETRUS CHASE ASSAULT (PO) (2903.13(A)(PO)) document preview
  • STATE OF OHIO vs ERIC DEMETRUS CHASE ASSAULT (PO) (2903.13(A)(PO)) document preview
  • STATE OF OHIO vs ERIC DEMETRUS CHASE ASSAULT (PO) (2903.13(A)(PO)) document preview
  • STATE OF OHIO vs ERIC DEMETRUS CHASE ASSAULT (PO) (2903.13(A)(PO)) document preview
  • STATE OF OHIO vs ERIC DEMETRUS CHASE ASSAULT (PO) (2903.13(A)(PO)) document preview
  • STATE OF OHIO vs ERIC DEMETRUS CHASE ASSAULT (PO) (2903.13(A)(PO)) document preview
						
                                

Preview

-G2-Lvv28-SvaG, aQuymyos4 O1 378 NMONX LON - Q3ld MSaQN3S O1 NUN 6 /BZ/6806-.. O920..34 oT nm @ESP ITO ‘COOMUTONS UNVW'1 ATH C16 hina ASVHO SAULENET ON etoz 2é Nar 920695 1000 3 Zz - zo a cll 000 $- zzrsr aiz 23 ’ ° ° a) ; oa SIMOG ASNIIKFOVISOd SN 3 ae U ——.- : Ae yuo &F COURTS OHIO & aoe nt Mowiieh p NERY COL ll MIOCT 1} PH 2:00 L3iCh000000000U0TS - ¥SECO WO 110% OSIT-ZEpSF CUO ‘Woke Juounredagyeuunty POL “Ury Geog Auied ‘Ni SUMO Jo WalQ Ajnog AiWOs soy ysnag ‘w A108015IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO, 2011-CR-3364 Plaintifi(s), JUDGE GREGORY F. SINGER ENTRY AND ORDER ADJUDGING BAIL FORFEIT AND ISSUING ARREST ERIC D. CHASE WARRANT -Vs- Defendant(s). This cause came on for hearing on the 25" day of June 2013, and the Defendant herein having failed t© appear, it is ORDERED that Defendant’s bail be and is hereby adjudged forfeit in its entirety and full amount, pursuant to Rule 46(1), Ohio Rules of Criminal Procedure, and to section 2937.35, Ohio Revised Code, and it is further ORDERED that a warrant issue for the arrest of the Defendant. SO ORDERED: JUDGE GREGORY = GenNOTICE TO DEFENDANT AND TO SURETY ON FORFEITED BAIL STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 2011-CR-3364 Plaintiffs), JUDGE GREGORY F. SINGER cys CLERK OF COURT’S NOTICE ERIC D. CHASE Defendant(s). You, ERIC D. CHASE, as Defendant, and you Sharon el hal , as Surety for the Defendant in the above-styled cause are hereby notified that this cause came on for hearing on 25 June, 2013; that the Defendant, having notice thereof, failed to appear; that bail was adjudged forfeit; and that a warrant for Defendant’s arrest was issued, all because of the breach by Defendant of the terms of such bail. You are required to show good cause, on or before the 13" day of August 2013 at 9am, why judgment should not be entered against you for the full amount stated in the recognizance. Witness my hand and seal, this an day of. Ju Mf, 2012 GREGORY A. BRUSH CLERK OF COURTS CC: — Surety Defendant Defense Counsel By: S. He Anim Prosecutor’s Office Deputy Clerk Court Services rev. 08/07