Motion-Secondary: Newton, Patsy et al vs. Enloe Medical Center

• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                Sean R. Laird (SBN 214916)
                 1
                         The Law Firm of Sean R. Laird
                 2       805 16th Street
                         Sacramento, CA 95814                                                                6/2/2021
                 3       (916) 441-1636
                 4       (916) 760-9002
                         seanlairdlaw@gmail.com
                 5
                 6       Attorneys for Plaintiffs
                 7
                 8                          SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF BUTTE
                 9
                 10
                         PATSY NEWTON, individually; HAROLD                          Case No. 20CV01091
                 11      NEWTON; individually; SUZANNE
                         BOLEN, individually.                                        PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO
                 12                                                                  DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE
                                           Plaintiffs,                               #26 TO “PRECLUDE PLAINTIFFS
                 13                                                                  FROM INTRODUCING EVIDENCE OF
                 14               vs.                                                ALLEGED REGULATORY
                                                                                     VIOLATIONS.”
                 15      ENLOE MEDICAL CENTER; and DOES 1 -
                 16      50, inclusive,                                              DATE:      June 4, 2021
                                                                                     TIME:      8:30 a.m.
                 17                        Defendants,                               Dept.     1
                 18                                                                  Hon. Tamara L. Mosbarger
                 19
                                                                                      Complaint Filed: 5/29/2020
                 20                                                                   Trial Date:   6/7/2021
                 21                                                 I. OPPOSITION
                 22
                                  Plaintiffs oppose this motion for the reasons stated in their motion in limine No. 18 and ask
                 23
                         to be heard at oral argument at the TRC.
                 24

                 25      Dated:   Wednesday, June 2, 2021                      The Law Firm of      Sean R. Laird
                 26                                                                     _________
                                                                                        Sean R. Laird
                 27                                                            ________________________
                                                                                        Sean R. Laird
                 28                                                                     Attorney for Plaintiffs

                                                                                   - 1!
                                                                                      -
                             PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE #26 TO “PRECLUDE PLAINTIFFS FROM INTRODUCING
                                                           EVIDENCE OF ALLEGED REGULATORY VIOLATIONS.”