On July 24, 2012 a
Answer
was filed
involving a dispute between
and
in the District Court of Franklin County.
Preview
Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2012 Sep 07 8:44 AM-12CV009367
OA663 - ROB
IN THE FRANKLIN COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CIVIL DIVISION
Fifth Third Bank Case No. 12 CV 009367
Judge McIntosh
Plaintiff,
-vs-
The Estate of Thomas Leo Getz, et al.
Defendants.
ANSWER OF DEFENDANTS THE ESTATE OF THOMAS LEO GETZ, DANIELLE D.
GETZ-WOYAN, ADMINISTRATOR, AND DANIELLE D. GETZ-WOYAN,
INDIVIDUALLY
Now comes the Defendant, The Estate of Thomas Leo Getz, Danielle D. Getz-Woyan,
Individually and as Administrator (hereinafter “Defendants”), by and through the undersigned
counsel, and for their Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint, states as follows:
FIRST DEFENSE
1. Defendants deny each and every allegation contained in Numbered Paragraph
One (1) of Plaintiff's Complaint.
2. Defendants are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief to the
allegations in Numbered Paragraph Two (2) of Plaintiff's Complaint and therefore deny the
same.
3. Defendants deny each and every allegation contained in Numbered Paragraph
Three (3) of Plaintiff's Complaint.Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2012 Sep 07 8:44 AM-12CV009367
OA663 - ROD
4. Defendants are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief to the
allegations in Numbered Paragraph Four (4) of Plaintiff's Complaint and therefore deny the
same.
5. Defendants admit the allegations contained Numbered Paragraph Five (5) of
Plaintiffs Complaint.
6. Defendants incorporate the above responses as if fully re-written herein in
response to Numbered Paragraph Six (6) of Plaintiff’s Complaint.
7. Defendant deny each and every allegation contained in Numbered Paragraph
Seven (7) of Plaintiffs Complaint
8. Defendants are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief to the
allegations in Numbered Paragraph Eight (8) of Plaintiff's Complaint and therefore deny the
same.
9. Defendants admit that the identified Mortgage appears to have been recorded and
that such instrument speaks for itself in Numbered Paragraph Nine (9) of Plaintiffs Complaint.
10. Defendants are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief to the
allegations in Numbered Paragraph Ten (10) of Plaintiff's Complaint and therefore deny the
same.
11. Defendants deny each and every allegation contained in Numbered Paragraph
Eleven (11) of Plaintiffs Complaint.
12. Defendants are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief to the
allegations in Numbered Paragraph Twelve (12) of Plaintiff's Complaint and therefore deny the
same but are able to admit the Defendants believe that Thomas L. Getz is currently the titled
owner of the property.OA663 - S
(Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2012 Sep 07 8:44 AM-12CV009367
13. Defendants deny each and every allegation contained in Numbered Paragraph
Thirteen (13) of Plaintiff's Complaint.
14. Defendants deny each and every allegation contained in Numbered Paragraph
Fourteen (14) of Plaintiffs Complaint
15. Defendants deny each and every allegation contained in Numbered Paragraph
Fifteen (15) of Plaintiffs Complaint
16. Defendants are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief to the
allegations in Numbered Paragraph Sixteen (16) of Plaintiff's Complaint and therefore deny the
same.
17. Defendants deny each and every allegations not specifically admitted herein.
SECOND DEFENSE
18. The Plaintiff's Complaint fails to state a claim against the Defendants upon which
relief may be granted.
THIRD DEFENSE
19. The Plaintiff has failed to join necessary parties pursuant to Rule 19 and/or Rule
19.1 of the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure.
FOURTH DEFENSE
20. The Plaintiff has failed to provide proof that it is the holder of the account subject
to this action.
SIXTH DEFENSE
21. Defendants reserves the right to add additional defenses as they are discovered.OA663 - S.
Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2012 Sep 07 8:44 AM-12CV009367
WHEREFORE, the Defendants, The Estate of Thomas Leo Getz, Danielle D. Getz-
Woyan, Individually and as Administrator, demand that the Plaintiffs Complaint be dismissed as
against him, that the Defendants be granted their costs and attorney’s fees expended herein, and
for such other relief to which they may be entitled in law and/or equity.
Respectfully submitted,
PRICE LAW FIRM, LLC
/s/ Bryan R. Moore
Bryan R. Moore (0085187)
Gary Paul Price (0010296)
Attorneys for Defendants, The Estate of
Thomas Leo Getz, Danielle D. Getz-Woyan,
Administrator, and Danielle D. Getz- Woyan,
Individually
Price Law Firm, LLC
555 City Park Avenue
Columbus, Ohio 43215
Telephone: (614) 224-2319
Email: Bryan.Moore@PriceLawOhio.com
Email: Gary.Price @ PriceLawOhio.com
Fax: (614) 224-4708OA663 - S.
3hranklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2012 Sep 07 8:44 AM-12CV009367
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and accurate copy of the foregoing was
served upon the following via U.S. Mail, postage prepaid this 7 day of September, 2012:
Bank One, NA
132 E. Washington Street
Indianapolis, IN 46204
Defendant
The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and accurate copy of the foregoing was
served upon the following individuals through the Court’s electronic filing system at the email
address registered with the Court on this 7” day of September, 2012:
Thomas D. Richards, Esq.
Attorney for Plaintiff, Fifth Third Bank
/s/ Bryan R. Moore
Bryan R. Moore (0085187)
Gary Paul Price (0010296)
Attorneys for Defendants, The Estate of
Thomas Leo Getz, Danielle D. Getz-Woyan,
Administrator, and Danielle D. Getz-Woyan,
Individually
Document Filed Date
September 07, 2012
Case Filing Date
July 24, 2012
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.