arrow left
arrow right
  • 12 CV 009367 document preview
  • 12 CV 009367 document preview
  • 12 CV 009367 document preview
  • 12 CV 009367 document preview
  • 12 CV 009367 document preview
  • 12 CV 009367 document preview
  • 12 CV 009367 document preview
  • 12 CV 009367 document preview
						
                                

Preview

Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2012 Sep 07 8:44 AM-12CV009367 OA663 - ROB IN THE FRANKLIN COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CIVIL DIVISION Fifth Third Bank Case No. 12 CV 009367 Judge McIntosh Plaintiff, -vs- The Estate of Thomas Leo Getz, et al. Defendants. ANSWER OF DEFENDANTS THE ESTATE OF THOMAS LEO GETZ, DANIELLE D. GETZ-WOYAN, ADMINISTRATOR, AND DANIELLE D. GETZ-WOYAN, INDIVIDUALLY Now comes the Defendant, The Estate of Thomas Leo Getz, Danielle D. Getz-Woyan, Individually and as Administrator (hereinafter “Defendants”), by and through the undersigned counsel, and for their Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint, states as follows: FIRST DEFENSE 1. Defendants deny each and every allegation contained in Numbered Paragraph One (1) of Plaintiff's Complaint. 2. Defendants are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief to the allegations in Numbered Paragraph Two (2) of Plaintiff's Complaint and therefore deny the same. 3. Defendants deny each and every allegation contained in Numbered Paragraph Three (3) of Plaintiff's Complaint.Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2012 Sep 07 8:44 AM-12CV009367 OA663 - ROD 4. Defendants are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief to the allegations in Numbered Paragraph Four (4) of Plaintiff's Complaint and therefore deny the same. 5. Defendants admit the allegations contained Numbered Paragraph Five (5) of Plaintiffs Complaint. 6. Defendants incorporate the above responses as if fully re-written herein in response to Numbered Paragraph Six (6) of Plaintiff’s Complaint. 7. Defendant deny each and every allegation contained in Numbered Paragraph Seven (7) of Plaintiffs Complaint 8. Defendants are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief to the allegations in Numbered Paragraph Eight (8) of Plaintiff's Complaint and therefore deny the same. 9. Defendants admit that the identified Mortgage appears to have been recorded and that such instrument speaks for itself in Numbered Paragraph Nine (9) of Plaintiffs Complaint. 10. Defendants are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief to the allegations in Numbered Paragraph Ten (10) of Plaintiff's Complaint and therefore deny the same. 11. Defendants deny each and every allegation contained in Numbered Paragraph Eleven (11) of Plaintiffs Complaint. 12. Defendants are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief to the allegations in Numbered Paragraph Twelve (12) of Plaintiff's Complaint and therefore deny the same but are able to admit the Defendants believe that Thomas L. Getz is currently the titled owner of the property.OA663 - S (Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2012 Sep 07 8:44 AM-12CV009367 13. Defendants deny each and every allegation contained in Numbered Paragraph Thirteen (13) of Plaintiff's Complaint. 14. Defendants deny each and every allegation contained in Numbered Paragraph Fourteen (14) of Plaintiffs Complaint 15. Defendants deny each and every allegation contained in Numbered Paragraph Fifteen (15) of Plaintiffs Complaint 16. Defendants are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief to the allegations in Numbered Paragraph Sixteen (16) of Plaintiff's Complaint and therefore deny the same. 17. Defendants deny each and every allegations not specifically admitted herein. SECOND DEFENSE 18. The Plaintiff's Complaint fails to state a claim against the Defendants upon which relief may be granted. THIRD DEFENSE 19. The Plaintiff has failed to join necessary parties pursuant to Rule 19 and/or Rule 19.1 of the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure. FOURTH DEFENSE 20. The Plaintiff has failed to provide proof that it is the holder of the account subject to this action. SIXTH DEFENSE 21. Defendants reserves the right to add additional defenses as they are discovered.OA663 - S. Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2012 Sep 07 8:44 AM-12CV009367 WHEREFORE, the Defendants, The Estate of Thomas Leo Getz, Danielle D. Getz- Woyan, Individually and as Administrator, demand that the Plaintiffs Complaint be dismissed as against him, that the Defendants be granted their costs and attorney’s fees expended herein, and for such other relief to which they may be entitled in law and/or equity. Respectfully submitted, PRICE LAW FIRM, LLC /s/ Bryan R. Moore Bryan R. Moore (0085187) Gary Paul Price (0010296) Attorneys for Defendants, The Estate of Thomas Leo Getz, Danielle D. Getz-Woyan, Administrator, and Danielle D. Getz- Woyan, Individually Price Law Firm, LLC 555 City Park Avenue Columbus, Ohio 43215 Telephone: (614) 224-2319 Email: Bryan.Moore@PriceLawOhio.com Email: Gary.Price @ PriceLawOhio.com Fax: (614) 224-4708OA663 - S. 3hranklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2012 Sep 07 8:44 AM-12CV009367 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and accurate copy of the foregoing was served upon the following via U.S. Mail, postage prepaid this 7 day of September, 2012: Bank One, NA 132 E. Washington Street Indianapolis, IN 46204 Defendant The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and accurate copy of the foregoing was served upon the following individuals through the Court’s electronic filing system at the email address registered with the Court on this 7” day of September, 2012: Thomas D. Richards, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff, Fifth Third Bank /s/ Bryan R. Moore Bryan R. Moore (0085187) Gary Paul Price (0010296) Attorneys for Defendants, The Estate of Thomas Leo Getz, Danielle D. Getz-Woyan, Administrator, and Danielle D. Getz-Woyan, Individually