On September 26, 2001 a Motion,Ex Parte was filed involving a dispute between Borsuk, Liliane, Borsuk, Mark, Ryan, Marci, Collins, Lynn, Goldrick, Diane, Goldrick, William, Gonzales, Mark, Kraech, Robert, Ryan, Keith, Spaccia, Victoria, Spaccia, Vincenzo, Washington, Nell, and Borsuk, Liliane, Borsuk, Mark, Collins, Lynn, Goldrick, Diane, Goldrick, William, Gonzales, Mark, Kraech, Robert, Ryan, Keith, Ryan, Marci, Spaccia, Victoria, Spaccia, Vincenzo, Washington, Nell, Goldrick, Bill, for civil in the District Court of San Francisco County.
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.
Preview
IIA San Francisco Superior Courts Information Technology Group Document Scanning Lead Sheet Sep-18-2002 2:32 pm Case Number: CPF-01-324908 Filing Date: Sep-18-2002 2:31 Juke Box: 001 Image: 00510111 ORDER BORSUK VS RYAN 001000510111 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.JAMES T. JOHNSON, ESQ. S.B. # 031333 JOHNSON & PARDINI One Maritime Plaza, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94111 TEL: (415) 986-8000 FAX: (415) 788-0136 Attorneys for Plaintiffs/Respondents Keith Ryan & Marci Ryan, Mark Gonzales, Lynn Collins, Nell Washington, Robert D. Krache, Victoria Spaccia, Vincenzo Spaccia, Diane & Bill Goldrick SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO MARK BORSUK, et al.., Petitioners, Vv. KEITH RYAN, et al. Respondents. KEITH RYAN, et al. Plaintiffs Ve MARK BORSUK, et al., Defendants The Motion by Petitioners in Consolidated Action No. and Defendants in Consolidated Action No. disqualification, regularly for hearing in Dept. Friday, August 23, 2002, Esq. CAdocsivallejo ticlcnsidtlopp mtn order 2 wed at 9:30 AM. CASE NO. 324908 ORDER RE MOTION FOR DISQUALIFICATION, INJUNCTION AND CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST Date: Time: Place: 8/23/02 9:30 AM Law & Motion, Dept. 302 CASE NO. 401473 324908 - 9/26/01 401473 - 11/19/01 Trial date: None set Actions filed 324908 401473 for injunction and constructive trust came on 302 of the above-entitled Court on Thomas G.F. Del Beccaro, appeared as the attorney for the moving parties and James T. 1 P&A’S IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISQUALIFY27 28 Johnson, Esq. appeared on behalf of the responding parties. The Court, having considered the Motion, Memorandum of Points & Authorities and Declarations in Support of the Motion and the Memorandum of Points & Authorities and Declarations with the Exhibits attached thereto in Opposition to the Motion, and having considered the oral arguments presented by counsel for the respective parties; AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR: 1. Hereby orders that the Motion for Disqualification is denied; 2. That the Motion for an Injunction is denied; and 3. That the Motion for a Constructive Trust is denied. Sel /€ Dated: Wueerst , 2002 A. JAMES ROBE SON, Hf C\docsWvallejo ticlensidtiopp mtn order 2 wpe 2 P&A’S IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISQUALIFY