arrow left
arrow right
  • Yatsenick, Rick et al vs. Old Wharf Village LLC et al Malpractice - Other document preview
  • Yatsenick, Rick et al vs. Old Wharf Village LLC et al Malpractice - Other document preview
  • Yatsenick, Rick et al vs. Old Wharf Village LLC et al Malpractice - Other document preview
  • Yatsenick, Rick et al vs. Old Wharf Village LLC et al Malpractice - Other document preview
  • Yatsenick, Rick et al vs. Old Wharf Village LLC et al Malpractice - Other document preview
  • Yatsenick, Rick et al vs. Old Wharf Village LLC et al Malpractice - Other document preview
						
                                

Preview

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS BARNSTABLE, ss. SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT CA. No. BACV2013-00125 fais RICK YATSENICK & JOAL YATSENICK, Lou. Plaintiffs, By He a u v4, [b [den 4) Aso Ne OLD WHARF VILLAGE, LLC, and CHARLES EDGAR, DAVID DILLON D/B/A DILLON REAL ESTATE and STACEY CURLEY Defendants The Defendants request that the court preclude the testimony of the Plaintiffs’ expert witness, Martin Loria, because the Plaintiffs’ disclosures of the basis for his opinion is inadequate pursuant to the Court’s Pre-Trial Order of February 10, 2016. As grounds therefore, the Defendants state: 1. This case arises out of a dispute over the 2010 sale of a new beachfront condominium unit in Dennisport, one of thirteen such units at 405 Old Wharf Village Road, all of which have been sold and are currently occupied. Photos of Unit 204, the unit at issue, are attached as Exhibit A. The case is currently scheduled for trial on March 21. 2. The Plaintiffs claim that they sought to purchase a residential condominium but were fraudulently sold an “interest in a commercial motel”. The Defendants claim that the 1fe deed inadvertently incorrectly described the permitted use of the condominium, but that in all other respects the condominium was as described, that nothing has interfered with the Plaintiffs use and enjoyment of the property since the time of purchase, that other purchasers of units in the building have used and enjoyed their property without interference, and special permits have since issued that would permit the Plaintiffs to use the property as a residence. 3. In 2015, the parties filed a Joint Pre-trial Memorandum in which the Plaintiffs identified Martin Loria as an expert witness. Exhibit B. The Plaintiffs state that Loria would opine @ that the Defendants sold the Plaintiffs a “worthless interest in a commercial motel that they cannot sell or use; and there is no way for the Yatsenicks to mitigate their damages because the actions and inactions of the Defendants rendered the title to the property economically unmarketable.” Exhibit B. The expert’s opinion did not address the impact of various changes to the special permits on the economic marketability of the property in the eight years since the time of purchase; did not address the fact that all other units in the building have sold and are currently occupied; did not address the @ impact of the sales of other units on the economic marketability of Unit 204; and did not address the impact of the issuance of a corrected deed on the potential value of the property. 4. The Plaintiffs state that the grounds for the expert’s opinion are: "1) current judicial interpretations; 2) standard accepted Massachusetts conveyancing practices; 3) the record title of the property; and 4) the subject property’s permits on file with the Town of Dennis.” Exhibit B. The complexity of the changes in permitted use of the property over time, the fact that all other allegedly “worthless” units in the complex have sold, and 2the fact that sales of comparable units suggest an appreciation in value of Unit 204, warranted disclosure of more detailed grounds for the Plaintiffs’ expert opinion. Exhibit c. 5. On January 22, 2018, I requested a more detailed summary of the grounds of the expert’s opinion from Plaintiff's counsel. Plaintiff's counsel declined to provide further detail. Exhibit D. 6. The Defendants cannot adequately prepare for trial without more specific grounds for the expert’s opinion. WHEREFORE, the Defendants request that the court prohibit the Plaintiffs from offering expert testimony. DATED: February 6, 2018 Respectfully submitted, Defendants, Old Wharf Village, LLC And Charles Edgar By their attorneys, Ge Dyuna Pérkins, BBO #561909 Lynne M. Chiodo, BBO# 657428 DP Law 619 High Street, Suite 103 Dedham, MA 02026 Phone: (781) 326-6320 Fax: (781) 326-6321 dp@djunaperkinslaw.com Ichiodo@djunaperkinslaw.com