arrow left
arrow right
  • PEREZ BARRIL, LEONOR VS SCHROCK, DOUGLAS Auto Negligence document preview
  • PEREZ BARRIL, LEONOR VS SCHROCK, DOUGLAS Auto Negligence document preview
  • PEREZ BARRIL, LEONOR VS SCHROCK, DOUGLAS Auto Negligence document preview
  • PEREZ BARRIL, LEONOR VS SCHROCK, DOUGLAS Auto Negligence document preview
						
                                

Preview

Filing # 29130879 E-Filed 06/30/2015 04:47:54 PM IN AND FOR SULT IN AND BAR CASE NO: 13-031784 CA O1 vs. my JES SCHROCK & SICA SCHROCK dants. Defe / PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT NOTWITHSTANDING 530 and fi in support jury ence and was COMES NOW the Plain this Motion thereof, Plai verdict was ag, Notwithstanding the ill show unto this Court th ligence attaches to the i coll See Beiiere yup The ite e and cau rear-end le, who, on is focused on ever front rath 1 generally knows he or she was know why. See Clampitt we. Dod. esta. 3 of the com beh Spencer Sales, 782No reasonable perso 2 ndant’s vers the evidence in letely disrega id dep comparatively n Looking a Defendant, and for the court CE ta ‘wed upon Lawrenc: tet and 3191 Coral Way Florida (305) 476~ (305) 476=5