On July 13, 2020 a
Miscellaneous
was filed
involving a dispute between
Umnv 205-207 Newbury Llc,
and
Caffe Nero Americas Inc,
for Business Litigation
in the District Court of Suffolk County.
Preview
CIVIL ACTION COVER pogxernoy B.L.S. Trial Court Of Massachusetts Superior Court Department County:
SHEET 3 oO - / fF. 3 SUFFOLK :
PLAINTIFFS) DEFENDANTS) i
UMNV 205-207 Newbury, LLC Caffe Nero Americas, Inc.
ATTORNEY, FIRM Ni ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE Board of Bar Overseers number ATTORNEY if known)
Wayne F. Dennispn (BBO #558879)
Joshua P. Dunn (BBO) #685262)
Brown Rudnick LLP
One Financial Center, Boston, MA 02111
Origin Code Origihal Complaint
BK.1
z
TYPE OF ACTION AND TRACK DESIGNATION (See reverse side) CODE NO. TYPE OF ACTION (specify) TRACK IS:
BKA |) J ¥es No
Breach of Commercial Lease
968 V EW ne oe
The following is a full and detailed statement of the facts on which plaintiff relies to determine eligibility in to The Business Litigation Session.
This case involves a claim for numerous breaches of a 57-page commercial lease (the "Lease") for
valuable commercial property on Newbury Street in Boston. The Defendant, the tenant under the
Lease, sought to avoid payment of rent and other amounts under the Lease shortly after the onset of the
COVID-19 pandemic. The Defendant has unjustifiably refused to pay any amounts due under the Lease
since April 2020, and the amount owed by the Defendant continues to increase. Accordingly, pursuant
to subdivision k.1 of Superior Court Administrative Directive No. 17-1 this "commercial lease dispute[ ]"
is appropriate for acceptance into the BLS.
* A Special Tracking Order shall be created by the Presiding Justice of the Business Litigation Session at the Rule 16 Conference.
PLEASE IDENTIFY, BY CASE NUMBER, NAME AND COUNTY, ANY RELATED ACTION PENDING IN THE SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT.
“Thereby certify that have complied with the requirements of Rule 5 of the Supr
requiring that I prdvide my clients with information about court-connected disp
disadvantages of ious methods.” Signature of Attorney of Reco
DATE: Z ZoZo
ispute Resolution (SJC Rule 1:18)
ym the advantages and
Document Filed Date
July 13, 2020
Case Filing Date
July 13, 2020
Category
Business Litigation
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
CIVIL ACTION COVER pogxernoy B.L.S. Trial Court Of Massachusetts Superior Court Department County: SHEET 3 oO - / fF. 3 SUFFOLK : PLAINTIFFS) DEFENDANTS) i UMNV 205-207 Newbury, LLC Caffe Nero Americas, Inc. ATTORNEY, FIRM Ni ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE Board of Bar Overseers number ATTORNEY if known) Wayne F. Dennispn (BBO #558879) Joshua P. Dunn (BBO) #685262) Brown Rudnick LLP One Financial Center, Boston, MA 02111 Origin Code Origihal Complaint BK.1 z TYPE OF ACTION AND TRACK DESIGNATION (See reverse side) CODE NO. TYPE OF ACTION (specify) TRACK IS: BKA |) J ¥es No Breach of Commercial Lease 968 V EW ne oe The following is a full and detailed statement of the facts on which plaintiff relies to determine eligibility in to The Business Litigation Session. This case involves a claim for numerous breaches of a 57-page commercial lease (the "Lease") for valuable commercial property on Newbury Street in Boston. The Defendant, the tenant under the Lease, sought to avoid payment of rent and other amounts under the Lease shortly after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Defendant has unjustifiably refused to pay any amounts due under the Lease since April 2020, and the amount owed by the Defendant continues to increase. Accordingly, pursuant to subdivision k.1 of Superior Court Administrative Directive No. 17-1 this "commercial lease dispute[ ]" is appropriate for acceptance into the BLS. * A Special Tracking Order shall be created by the Presiding Justice of the Business Litigation Session at the Rule 16 Conference. PLEASE IDENTIFY, BY CASE NUMBER, NAME AND COUNTY, ANY RELATED ACTION PENDING IN THE SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT. “Thereby certify that have complied with the requirements of Rule 5 of the Supr requiring that I prdvide my clients with information about court-connected disp disadvantages of ious methods.” Signature of Attorney of Reco DATE: Z ZoZo ispute Resolution (SJC Rule 1:18) ym the advantages and