arrow left
arrow right
  • Silver, Glenford vs. Kirgiz Realty, LLC Other Negligence - Personal Injury / Property Damage document preview
  • Silver, Glenford vs. Kirgiz Realty, LLC Other Negligence - Personal Injury / Property Damage document preview
  • Silver, Glenford vs. Kirgiz Realty, LLC Other Negligence - Personal Injury / Property Damage document preview
  • Silver, Glenford vs. Kirgiz Realty, LLC Other Negligence - Personal Injury / Property Damage document preview
  • Silver, Glenford vs. Kirgiz Realty, LLC Other Negligence - Personal Injury / Property Damage document preview
  • Silver, Glenford vs. Kirgiz Realty, LLC Other Negligence - Personal Injury / Property Damage document preview
  • Silver, Glenford vs. Kirgiz Realty, LLC Other Negligence - Personal Injury / Property Damage document preview
  • Silver, Glenford vs. Kirgiz Realty, LLC Other Negligence - Personal Injury / Property Damage document preview
						
                                

Preview

"> THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS MIDDLESEX, ss. Superior Court Civil Action No.: 14-08312-F ) FILED GLENFORD SILVER, ) CLERK OF COURT ) FORTHE SouNors MIDDLESEX Plaintiff ) ) FEB 6 2017 v. ) ) Oma KIRGIZ REALTY, LLC } eh Defendant ) ) DEFENDANT'S PRETRIAL MEMORANDUM I, STATEMENT OF FACTS At the time of the incident alleged in the complaint, plaintifs was an employee Yourelo ‘Your Full-Service Relocation Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation (“Yourelo”), at premises used by Yourelo which conducted business as Gentle Movers. At that time, title to the premises stood in the name of Kirgiz Realty, LLC (“Kirgiz”). Kirgiz is a wholly owned subsidiary of Yourelo which was dissolved prior to the accident. Kirgiz’s assets have all been transferred to its sole member and 100% owner, ‘Yourelo. Defendant’s manager worked for approximately 8 hours with the plaintiff at the premises on the date of the alleged incident, and then drove him back to Boston. Plaintiff appeared well, and did not mention an accident or injury. Plaintiff later filed a worker’s compensation claim against Yourelo and collected a payment. Lof4IL, STATEMENTS REGARDING EXPECTED EVIDENCE A, Plaintiff's Expected Evidence Although requested to provide information for a memorandum, Plaintiff has provided no information regarding his expected evidence. B. Defendant’s Expected Evidence 1. Defendant’s manager is expected to testify that he worked for approximately 8 hours with the plaintiff at the premises on the date of the alleged incident, and then drove him back to Boston. Plaintiff appeared well, and did not mention an accident or injury 2, Dr. Richard W. Warnock conducted an independent medical exam and states that after visiting the emergency room on May 30, 2012 and June 4, 2012, , the plaintiff left the country for a period of time, and there is no record of treatment until approximately 17 months later On October 9, 2013. On June 2, 2014, he was in a motor vehicle accident. On June 27, 2014 he was in a second motor vehicle accident. In the fall, the plaintiff aggravated resisting cervical and lumbar spondylosis. Treatment after June, 2014 is related to the motor vehicle accidents. Iii. AGREED SUGGESTED DESCRIPTION OF CASE TO BE READ TO THE JURY Not applicable. IV. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT LEGAL ISSUES 1, Subject Matter Jurisdiction. Defendant maintains that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, as Yourelo and Kirgiz were both employers engaged in a joint enterprise, as set forth more fully in a pending motion to dismiss. 2. Negligence. Defendant maintains that it was not negligent and that plaintiff was negligent. 20f 43. Causation, Defendant maintains that damages, if any, were not caused by a fall at the premises. 4. Damages. Defendant denies damages. V. PARTIES’ WITNESSES A. Plaintiff’s Witnesses Defendant has no knowledge. B. Defendant’s Witnesses Sefer Ozdemir, manager, Kirgiz and Yourelo. Dr. Richard Warnock. Defendant reserves the right to call other witnesses for rebuttal, or regarding matters raised by plaintiff in its memorandum. VIE. ESTIMATED LENGTH OF TRIAL Unknown at present. VOU. SPECIAL OR LIQUIDATED DAMAGES Unknown at present. IX. CERTIFICATION BY COUNSEL Counsel for the defendant certifies that he has conferred with his client regarding settlement and alternate dispute resolution. Defendant has concluded that there is no reasonable possibility of settlement and that this case is not amenable to mediation or other forms of alternate dispute resolution. 3 of 4Respectfully submitted, Kirgiz Realty, LLC Richardson and Tyler, LLP 3 Cabot Place, Suite 9 Stoughton, MA 02072 781-341-0000 jklements@rtlegal.com BBO 275060 4of4