On August 24, 2018 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Shapiro, Jordan L.,
and
Amato, Susan B.,
Croteau, Donna M.,
Croteau, Richard,
Geer, Brian,
Geer, Cynthia A,
Geer, Daniel E.,
Geer, Doris,
Geer, Paul R.,
Geer, Robert F.,
Geer, Wayne,
Hinton, Rosemary,
Kuchlewski, Patricia,
Morse, Lorraine L.,
for Contract / Business Cases
in the District Court of Middlesex County.
Preview
“F
82, pl
le repose tee Sega Plan f
sa ores aca . ws
COMMONWEALTH OF Se meancnieens be \%, Zea,
DDLESEX, ss SUPERIOR COURT STAN aw tine x
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1881CV02451
é me
(ORDAN L. SHAPIRO
zn
wee,
Lowen
PR
g a
Plaintiff, ‘ aus
53
3.
0
~ NDANIEL GEER, et al.
Defendants
&
% Kee Pet Sub
AA NUED
Zon |
DEFENDANT DANIEL GEER’S MOTION TO COMPEL CROSSCLAIM DEFENDANT
DORIS GEER TO PRODUCE HER TAX RETURNS
Now comes the defendant, Daniel Geer, through his attorney and moves this
hag ech
2k a
Honorable Court, pursuant to Mass.R.Civ.P. 37(a)(2) and (d), to compel the Crossclaim
Bact Doris Geer, to produce the documents requested by Daniel Geer in accordance with
ta
his Request for Production of Documents.
In support of this motion, Daniel states that:
comme
Cans
Daniel Geer sent Doris Geer two requests for the production of documents seeking her
tax returns. The requests are as follows:
x
o
aon
12. Your tax returns for the discovery period. [1990 to present]
13. Any tax return that reflects monies paid or received for the premises during the
discovery period. [1990 to present.]
Kenmare, Ard Crna
matrar do
%
Doris Geer has refused to produce any documents in response to this request.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND OF CASE
Daniel claims that these documents are relevant to the issues raised at trial. This case
oo.
volves allegations that Doris did not properly manage the property located at 31 Mt. Vernon
Park, Malden from 2001 to 2018. Daniel claims that instead of using the rent from the property
tue
Ao tt
(2 («lta Aftee
Document Filed Date
October 01, 2019
Case Filing Date
August 24, 2018
Category
Contract / Business Cases
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
“F 82, pl le repose tee Sega Plan f sa ores aca . ws COMMONWEALTH OF Se meancnieens be \%, Zea, DDLESEX, ss SUPERIOR COURT STAN aw tine x CIVIL ACTION NO. 1881CV02451 é me (ORDAN L. SHAPIRO zn wee, Lowen PR g a Plaintiff, ‘ aus 53 3. 0 ~ NDANIEL GEER, et al. Defendants & % Kee Pet Sub AA NUED Zon | DEFENDANT DANIEL GEER’S MOTION TO COMPEL CROSSCLAIM DEFENDANT DORIS GEER TO PRODUCE HER TAX RETURNS Now comes the defendant, Daniel Geer, through his attorney and moves this hag ech 2k a Honorable Court, pursuant to Mass.R.Civ.P. 37(a)(2) and (d), to compel the Crossclaim Bact Doris Geer, to produce the documents requested by Daniel Geer in accordance with ta his Request for Production of Documents. In support of this motion, Daniel states that: comme Cans Daniel Geer sent Doris Geer two requests for the production of documents seeking her tax returns. The requests are as follows: x o aon 12. Your tax returns for the discovery period. [1990 to present] 13. Any tax return that reflects monies paid or received for the premises during the discovery period. [1990 to present.] Kenmare, Ard Crna matrar do % Doris Geer has refused to produce any documents in response to this request. FACTUAL BACKGROUND OF CASE Daniel claims that these documents are relevant to the issues raised at trial. This case oo. volves allegations that Doris did not properly manage the property located at 31 Mt. Vernon Park, Malden from 2001 to 2018. Daniel claims that instead of using the rent from the property tue Ao tt (2 («lta Aftee