arrow left
arrow right
  • Lerner, ppa, Sarah et al vs. Regal Ware Inc. et al Products Liability document preview
  • Lerner, ppa, Sarah et al vs. Regal Ware Inc. et al Products Liability document preview
  • Lerner, ppa, Sarah et al vs. Regal Ware Inc. et al Products Liability document preview
  • Lerner, ppa, Sarah et al vs. Regal Ware Inc. et al Products Liability document preview
  • Lerner, ppa, Sarah et al vs. Regal Ware Inc. et al Products Liability document preview
  • Lerner, ppa, Sarah et al vs. Regal Ware Inc. et al Products Liability document preview
  • Lerner, ppa, Sarah et al vs. Regal Ware Inc. et al Products Liability document preview
  • Lerner, ppa, Sarah et al vs. Regal Ware Inc. et al Products Liability document preview
						
                                

Preview

Y. 3 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS MIDDLESEX, ss. SUPERIOR COURT DEPT. CIVIL ACTION NO. MICV2013-04165-D * SARAH LERNER, PPA CHANA LERNER and YSHAYU * LERNER, CHANA LERNER, Individually and YSHAYU LERNER, Individually, Plaintiffs * | rend JUL $i 2H? vs. REGAL WARE, INC. and BOSTON SHOWCASE COMPANY, INC., Defendant a DEFENDANT’S REGAL WARE, INC.’s REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO SEAL EXHIBIT A OF ITS MOTION TO BIFURCATE TRIAL NOW COMES the Defendant, Regal Ware, Inc. (Regal), in reply to Plaintiffs opposition to Regal’s Motion to Seal exhibit A of its Motion to Bifurcate Trial. Defendant largely does not object to Plaintiffs recitation of the law of impounding, particularly to the extent that it recognizes the importance of public access to court records and proceedings. Plaintiff, however, asserts that Regal Ware, Inc.’s (“Regal”) motion only articulates one ground, yet then quotes three which were clearly stated in Regal’s motion. Defendant is most concerned with only one of these grounds: that the Plaintiff is fully nude or partially nude in a significant number of the photos that comprise Exhibit A of the Motion to Bifurcate Trial. For this reason, Defendant moves to file these photos under seal, primarily because the Plaintiff's right to privacy is hers, and hers alone to waive if she so chooses.' Defendant takes no position | Defendant respectfully disputes, however, that any legitimate public interest could be recognized in photographs of anude child, and believes this issue speaks for itself as a long recognized matter of public policy.on whether the parents of a minor child may waive said child’s right to keep nude photographs of herself private except to agree that, if anyone has such right, it is her parents. Defendant moved to file these photos under seal expressly out of respect for Sarah Lerner’s (“Sarah”) right to privacy and body autonomy. Defendant similarly would have done so had the photographs depicted a nude adult, and felt it doubly necessary given that Sarah was and is a child not of an age legally recognized to be able to consent to nude photography.” These matters aside, Defendant would clarify issues before submitting to the wisdom and discretion of this Honorable Court regarding whether these photographs should be included in the public docketing of this motion. 1. Defendant’s Motion to Seal is filed solely for purposes of the instant motion and is not intended to serve as a motion in limine in any way. Defendants reserve the right to file any and all appropriate motions in limine prior to the time of trial, but are not, by way of the instant motion, currently requesting an order which would prejudice Plaintiffs right to introduce relevant evidence. Defendant defers all argument on such matters until trial or any appropriate pre-trial hearings scheduled by this Court. 2. Separate and in addition to the privacy interests of Sarah, Defendant filed this motion and submitted these photographs in a sealed, opaque envelope, in no small part out of respect for the staff, clerks, and other professionals of this Court who may reasonably expect not to be exposed to photographs of a nude child. Defendant defers to the wisdom of this Honorable Court on this issue in setting its own practices and policies, but files in such fashion out of an abundance of caution and to allow this Court to review such photographs before determining whether or not they should be part of the public record.3. Defendant has no objection to any narrowly tailored remedy crafted by this Court in the interest of preserving Lerner’s privacy, including but not limited to the request proposed by Plaintiff's counsel in its Opposition at page 5. Respectfully submitted, REGAL WARE, INC. By its Attorneys, istopher J. Sullivan—BBO #548137 csullivan@sullivanlitigation.com Peter A. Ghattas-BBO # 688872 pghattas@sullivanlitigation.com Sullivan & Associates, LLC 500 West Cummings Park, Suite 4700 Woburn MA 01801 IF Dated: (781) 939-5840CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Peter A. Ghattas, counsel for the defendant hereby certify that I served the within document on all parties of interest by mailing a copy of same, postage prepaid, to: Joseph A. Swartz, Esq. Swartz & Swartz 10 Marshall Street Boston, MA 02108 Dated: Pf Petér A. Ghattas