arrow left
arrow right
  • Carreiro, John et al vs. Mendonca, John Other Negligence - Personal Injury / Property Damage document preview
  • Carreiro, John et al vs. Mendonca, John Other Negligence - Personal Injury / Property Damage document preview
  • Carreiro, John et al vs. Mendonca, John Other Negligence - Personal Injury / Property Damage document preview
  • Carreiro, John et al vs. Mendonca, John Other Negligence - Personal Injury / Property Damage document preview
  • Carreiro, John et al vs. Mendonca, John Other Negligence - Personal Injury / Property Damage document preview
  • Carreiro, John et al vs. Mendonca, John Other Negligence - Personal Injury / Property Damage document preview
						
                                

Preview

4 LO. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS BRISTOL, ss. SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1773CV00966 JOHN CARREIRO, and SHERRIE CARREIRO, Plaintiffs BRISTOL SS SUPE RIOR C v. FILED OURT JOHN MENDONCA, OcT Defendant. 8 2020 MARC J SANTOS. Esq. CLERK/MAGIST! And RATE ACE AMERICAN INS. COMPANY, Intervener INTERVENER’ S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO AMEND AND CLARIFY JOINT PETITION FOR APPROVAL OF THIRD-PARTY SETTLEMENT (M.G.L. CHAPTER 152, § 15 AND M.G.L. CHAPTER 231, § 14C 1/2) NOW comes the Intervener, ACE American Insurance Company, in the above captioned case and does respectfully request that this Honorable Court allow the parties to amend and clarify the Joint Petition for Approval of Third-Party Settlement to clarify the Payee and the obligations of the third-party insurer with respect to the workers’ compensation insurer. As reasons _ therefore, the parties do state and avow: 1.The parties appeared before this Honorable Court on 09/17/19. At that time, a Joint Petition for Approval ofThird-Party Settlement was presented and approved by the Court. The plaintiffs have received their portion, all of Reliability Settlement. This payee remains unaffected by the proposed changes to the Joint Petition for Approval of Third-Party Settlement. The only substantive change to the Petition is clarification of the payee under the terms of the Joint Petition. . The original Joint Petition for Approval of Third-Party Settlement identified the Intervener as the insurer, ACE American Insurance Company/INA. The proper insurer in this case was ACE American Insurance Company. - The Intervener in this case was Ace American Insurance Company, not Ace American Insurance Company/INA. . The Workers’ Compensation Insurer has not been paid in this instance. The original Joint Petition for Approval of Third-Party Settlement directed the third-party insurer to pay the ACE American Insurance Company/INA. This was a scrivener’s error. . The proper payee in this case is Allied Waste Management Services, LLC. As detailed in the amended and clarified Section 15 Petition, Allied Waste Services of Massachusetts, LLC has a three million-dollar ($3,000,000.00) deductible. All payments made in this case were made by Allied Waste Services of Massachusetts, LLC. Therefore, the correct payee in this matter is Allied Waste Services of Massachusetts, LLC, the insured, pursuant tothe policy of insurance issued by Ace American Insurance Company. 7.In order to clarify the payee and ensure payment of the monies due to the workers’ compensation insurer, the parties do request the Court approve the amended and clarified Section 15 Petition. For all these and other valid reasons, the parties request that the Court approve the amended Section 15 Petition. For the Intervener, ACE American Insurance Company, Beas a W. Todé_Huste (BBO# 567267) Moriarty & Associates, P.C. 33 Waldo Street, Ste. 3R Worcester, MA 01608 (508) 791-9047 . thuston@huston-law.com 10/06/20