On October 13, 2015 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
T.J.M.,
and
Bile, Jr., Emmanuel,
King, Justin,
Liccardi, Adam,
Womack, Caleb,
for Torts
in the District Court of Hampshire County.
Preview
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Superior Court Department
Civil Division -
Hampshire, ss ‘ Civil Action Number:
, # 15-CV-205
T.J.M.
Plaintiffs,
vs
9 Soya ef
HAMPSHIRE SUPERIOR COURT
FEB 2 3 2016:
Adam Liccardi et al.
Defendants
x.
ADDITIONAL MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
TO SERVE RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT
Jee
Now comes the defendant, Adam Liccardi, acting pro se/
pro per, without qualified counsel, and respectfully moves this
Honorable Court to issue an order that would subsequently allow
lg.
3D 4
an additional extension of sixty (60) days (in addition to the
BNI
N
os
time already allowed by this court - see Docket, Paper #5.)
Thus, allowing him to serve response to complaint, pursuant
to Mass. R. Civ. P., Rule 6(B)(1).
In support herein, the defendant states that he has no
legal training in the law and is totally dependent in a Jail-
~
House Lawyer and due to many changes, within the facility,
of the daily operations, the law library is kept closed more
WA
hs frequent than it use to, and furthermore, the institution now
has been dividing the prison by "North" side, and "gouth" side
in that after the 6:00 pm count, each side of the prison
‘alternates in going to the library, thus, given the fact that
_ the defendant and the individual (Jail—House Lawyer) willing
to assist him see each other for minimal times per week. In
ALG
Document Filed Date
February 29, 2016
Case Filing Date
October 13, 2015
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Superior Court Department Civil Division - Hampshire, ss ‘ Civil Action Number: , # 15-CV-205 T.J.M. Plaintiffs, vs 9 Soya ef HAMPSHIRE SUPERIOR COURT FEB 2 3 2016: Adam Liccardi et al. Defendants x. ADDITIONAL MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT Jee Now comes the defendant, Adam Liccardi, acting pro se/ pro per, without qualified counsel, and respectfully moves this Honorable Court to issue an order that would subsequently allow lg. 3D 4 an additional extension of sixty (60) days (in addition to the BNI N os time already allowed by this court - see Docket, Paper #5.) Thus, allowing him to serve response to complaint, pursuant to Mass. R. Civ. P., Rule 6(B)(1). In support herein, the defendant states that he has no legal training in the law and is totally dependent in a Jail- ~ House Lawyer and due to many changes, within the facility, of the daily operations, the law library is kept closed more WA hs frequent than it use to, and furthermore, the institution now has been dividing the prison by "North" side, and "gouth" side in that after the 6:00 pm count, each side of the prison ‘alternates in going to the library, thus, given the fact that _ the defendant and the individual (Jail—House Lawyer) willing to assist him see each other for minimal times per week. In ALG