arrow left
arrow right
  • BUNNELL, BILL VS. WRIGHT, JASONcivil document preview
  • BUNNELL, BILL VS. WRIGHT, JASONcivil document preview
  • BUNNELL, BILL VS. WRIGHT, JASONcivil document preview
  • BUNNELL, BILL VS. WRIGHT, JASONcivil document preview
						
                                

Preview

Bradley A. Post, Esq. SBN 127028 Sarah A. Omelas, Esq. SBN 258890 BORTON PETRINI, LLP 201 Needham Street Modesto, California 95354 Tel: (209) 576-1701 Fax: (209) 527-9753 2017’“ bpost@bortonpetrini.com somelas@bortonpetrini.com 8 1 Attorneysfor Defendants Great Valley Realtors, Inc., MAY Troy Wright and Audrey Goesch SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF STANISLAUS BILL BUNNELL and KIM BUNNELL, J Case No. 201 8041 Plaintiffs, .ORDER REGARDING MOTION 'IO COMPEL PLAINTIFF KIM V. BUNNELL’ S RESPONSES TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION AND FOR GREAT VALLEY REALTORS INC, AUDREY MONETARY SANCTIONS GOESCH, TROY WRIGHT, JASON WRIGHT, GINA WRIGHT, CENTURY 21 M&M AND ASSOCIATES, TAMI GOSSELIN, DAMON SALINAS, DUNCAN LYONS, AMERISPEC INSPECTION SERVICES and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. PREMIER VALLEY, INC. dba CENTURY 21 M&M and ASSOCIATES and TAMI GOSSELIN, Cross-Complainant, V. TROY WRIGHT, JASON WRIGHT, GINA WRIGHT, DUNCAN LYONS, AMERISPEC INSPECTION SERVICES, and DOES 1 through 15 Cross-Defendants. 28 h:\6|22l\7085 I\pleadings\or dermoncompe [PROPOSED] ORDER |.kim‘docx On May 3, 2017, at 8:30 a.m. in Department 24, this matter came before the Court upon Defendants Great Valley Realtors, Inc., Troy Wright and Audrey Goesch’s Motion to Compel Plaintiff, Kim Bunnell’s Responses to their Requests for Production of Documents, Set One and for monetary sanctions. No request for oral argument on the Court’s tentative ruling was made by either party. The Court having read and considered the moving papers, the Court makes the following order: Defendants’ Motion to Compel Plaintiff, KIM BUNNELL, to provide Responses to Request for Production of Documents, Set One and for Sanctions is GRANTED in part and DENIED in 10 part, as unopposed. 11 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: KIM BUNNELL, shall provide full and complete responses, without 12 1. Plaintiff, 13 objection, to the Request for Production of Documents, Set One, served on or about November 15, 2016, 14 no later than May 25, 2017. 15 2. The Defendants’ request for Sanctions is DENIED as Plaintiff did not oppose the 16 motion. 17 18 19 1T Is DATED: so ORDERED. ‘ d3 av/9 % g FTHE SUPERIOR COURT ROGER M. z BEAUCHESNE 20 Approved as to Form and Content: 21 22 23 Mina L. Ramirez 24 Attorneyfor Plaintiffs 25 26 27 28 h:\6122 H7085 1\pleadings\or der.mol.compe [PROPOSED] ORDER |.kim‘docx