arrow left
arrow right
  • Robert Macedo vs. City of Reedley *WM02 Unlimited - Writ of Mandate document preview
  • Robert Macedo vs. City of Reedley *WM02 Unlimited - Writ of Mandate document preview
  • Robert Macedo vs. City of Reedley *WM02 Unlimited - Writ of Mandate document preview
  • Robert Macedo vs. City of Reedley *WM02 Unlimited - Writ of Mandate document preview
  • Robert Macedo vs. City of Reedley *WM02 Unlimited - Writ of Mandate document preview
  • Robert Macedo vs. City of Reedley *WM02 Unlimited - Writ of Mandate document preview
						
                                

Preview

LAW OFFICES OF BENNETT, SHARPE & BENNETT, INC. 2 A Professional Corporation 3 BARRY J. BENNETT (SBN: 69697) ANN M. BENNETT (SBN: 276411) 4 2444 Main Street, Suite 150 Fresno, California 93721 5 RECEIVED Telephone No.: (559) 485-0120 2/18/2021 2:01 PM FAX No.: (559) 485-5823 FRESNO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 6 e-mail address: mschoolfield@bennettsharpe.com By: K. Daves, Deputy 7 Attorneys for Petitioner 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF FRESNO 10 11 ROBERT MACEDO Case No.: 20CECG01298 12 Petitioner, STIPULATION AND ORDERRE 13 BRIEFING SCHEDULE vs. REPETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE 14 [CCP Sections 1094.5 and 1088] 15 CITY OF REEDLEY; NICOLE ZIEBA, Date: May 7, 2021 16 CITY MANAGER CITY OF REEDLEY Time: 9:00a.m. Dept.: 503 17 Respondents. 18 ------------------------~/ 19 It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the pmiies hereto, through their respective 20 counsel, that the briefing schedule regarding the hearing on Petitioner's Writ of Mandate, now 21 scheduled for May 7, 2021, shall be as follows: Petitioner's Opening Brief- 45 days before hearing (3/23/21); 22 Opposition- 25 days before hearing (4/12/21); and 23 Reply Brief- 15 days before the hearing (4/22/21) 24 Briefs are to be served via email on all parties the same day the brief is to be filed with the 25 Court, with a courtesy copy to be sent by surface mail on the same day. 26 27 28 STIPULATION RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE There is, and would be, no evident prejudice to any party nor the Court by this agreed-upon LAW OFFICES OF BENNETT, SHARPE & BENNETT, INC. k·:J.~ By~ BARRY J. BENNETT Attorneys for Petitioner ORDER JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT 2 STIPULATION RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE PROOF OF SERVICE 2 I am a resident of the State of California, over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to the 3 within action. My business address is Bennett, Sharpe & Bennett, Inc., 2444 Main Street, Suite 150, 4 Fresno, Califomia 93721. On February 17, 2021, I served the within document(s): 5 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE 6 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE 7 _ _,X"'- Electronic Mail: I caused the above-named document(s) to be transmitted via electronic mail 8 to the address(es) listed below. 9 Jenell Van Bindsbergen: jvanbindsbergen@lozanosmith.com IO _X_ By Electronic Filing: I caused such documents to bee-tiled via ODYSSEY SECURE e-FILE. II Odyssey: Secure e-file I2 13 I am readily familiar with the firm's practice of collecting and processing conespondence for I4 mailing and for shipping via overnight courier. Under the practice it would be deposited with the U.S. I5 Postal Service or if an overnight shipment, deposited in an overnight pick-up box or office on the same I6 day with postage or fees thereon fully prepaid in the ordinary course of business. 17 I declare under penalty of pmjury under the laws of the State of California and the United I8 States of America that the above is true and correct. Executed on February 17, 2021, at Fresno, I9 California. 20 2I MESCHELESCHOOLFi;ELD 22 23 24 25 26 27 28