On June 03, 2017 a
Motion,Ex Parte
was filed
involving a dispute between
Cavalry Spv I Llc,
and
Mcallister, Harry,
for Contract & Indebtedness
in the District Court of Miami-Dade County.
Preview
Filing # 76101850 E-Filed 08/07/2018 03:32:45 PM
IN THE COUNTY COURT IN AND FOR MIAMI DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA.
CASE NO.: 2017-013321-CA-01
CAVALRY SPV ILLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
HARRY MCALLISTER,
Defendant.
/
MOTION TO DISSOLVE WRIT OF GARNISHMENT.
Defendant hereby requests that the Court enter an order dissolving the writ of garnishment in the
above-styled action pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 77.07 and states that when Plaintiff moved for a writ of
garnishment, it submitted to the Court that it possessed a judgment. This was an untrue statement
because the judgment obtained is void ab initio for failure to conduct notice a hearing on unliquidated
damages. As such, the writ of garnishment must be dissolved pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 77.07.
WHEREFORE, Defendant requests that the Court enter an ord caung the Default Judgment,
dissolving the writ of garnishment, and providing any such fup#tér relief deems just and equitable.
, Esq. FBN 17862
Debt Defeffse Law
6915 Red Road #200
Coral Gables, Florida 33143
Tel.: (305) 444-4323
service@debtdefenselaw.com
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the
Hayt, Hayt and Landau 7765 SW 87th Ave #101, Miami, F
Portal on August 7, 2018.
going was served on Dana Stern , Esq.,
service@haytfla.com) via the E-Filing
ddfizke, Esq. FBN 17862
Document Filed Date
August 07, 2018
Case Filing Date
June 03, 2017
Category
Contract & Indebtedness
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
Filing # 76101850 E-Filed 08/07/2018 03:32:45 PM IN THE COUNTY COURT IN AND FOR MIAMI DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. CASE NO.: 2017-013321-CA-01 CAVALRY SPV ILLC, Plaintiff, v. HARRY MCALLISTER, Defendant. / MOTION TO DISSOLVE WRIT OF GARNISHMENT. Defendant hereby requests that the Court enter an order dissolving the writ of garnishment in the above-styled action pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 77.07 and states that when Plaintiff moved for a writ of garnishment, it submitted to the Court that it possessed a judgment. This was an untrue statement because the judgment obtained is void ab initio for failure to conduct notice a hearing on unliquidated damages. As such, the writ of garnishment must be dissolved pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 77.07. WHEREFORE, Defendant requests that the Court enter an ord caung the Default Judgment, dissolving the writ of garnishment, and providing any such fup#tér relief deems just and equitable. , Esq. FBN 17862 Debt Defeffse Law 6915 Red Road #200 Coral Gables, Florida 33143 Tel.: (305) 444-4323 service@debtdefenselaw.com CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the Hayt, Hayt and Landau 7765 SW 87th Ave #101, Miami, F Portal on August 7, 2018. going was served on Dana Stern , Esq., service@haytfla.com) via the E-Filing ddfizke, Esq. FBN 17862