arrow left
arrow right
  • NILDA RUSCALLEDA VS WAL-MART STORES, INC. Comm Premises Liability document preview
  • NILDA RUSCALLEDA VS WAL-MART STORES, INC. Comm Premises Liability document preview
  • NILDA RUSCALLEDA VS WAL-MART STORES, INC. Comm Premises Liability document preview
  • NILDA RUSCALLEDA VS WAL-MART STORES, INC. Comm Premises Liability document preview
						
                                

Preview

Filing # 62253133 E-Filed 10/02/2017 12:09:05 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA NILDA RUSCALLEDA, VS. GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION Plaintiff, CASE NO.: 17-014924 CA (11) Florida Bar No: 0008486 WAL-MART STORES, INC., a foreign corporation, Defendant. EK105970e2e51US / PLAINTIFE’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION COMES NOW the Plaintiff, NILDA RUSCALLEDA, by and through undersigned counsel files her Response to Defendant, WAL-MART STORES, INC., Request to Produce bearing certificate date of July 12, 2017, as follows: . Objection, irrelevant, immaterial and will not lead to the discovery of admissible evidence as Plaintiff is not making a loss wage claim. . Objection, irrelevant, immaterial and will not lead to the discovery of admissible evidence as Plaintiff is not making a loss wage claim. . Objection, attorney/client work product privilege. Without waiving the objection, attached are (8) photographs of the scene of the accident and Plaintiff's injuries after the incident occurred. . Attached are all medical records in Plaintiffs possession. . Please see attached prior shoulder surgery films. . Objection, overbroad, ambiguous, attorney/client work product privilege. Without waiving the objection, none at this time after the applicable Florida Statute and case law relevant to slip and fall cases at commercial establishments. . Undetermined at this time as discovery still continues. . Have requested and will provide upon receipt.Case Now $7-014924 CA (11) 9. Objection, irrelevant, immaterial and will not lead to the discovery of admissible evidence as Plaintiff is not making a loss wage claim, 10. None in Plaintiff's possession. 11. None other than Medicaid which is attached to response to Request for Production. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE | HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing was mailed this y of September, 2017 to Samuel S. Lewis, Esq., Marlow, Adler, Abrams, Newnan & Lewis, 4000 Ponce de Leon Blvd. Suite 570, Coral Gables, Fl 33146; slewis@marlowadler.comy jr ick @marlowadier.com. FRIEDLAND LAW GROUP 1430 South Dixie Hwy. Coral Gables, Blouida 33146 Tels (305),661-2008 / Pax: (305) 661-2001 i / : : : BY___ iframe Jonathan edlarid, Bad.