On November 27, 2017 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Hartnett, Anne,
and
Civil Service Commission,
Department Of Revenue,
for Administrative Civil Actions
in the District Court of Bristol County.
Preview
BSAA~ bse AW
Hi~ | Th /7oPF0n 73
eos Sugper PeA oy Sb SANA
5 Oyler /F70r~ :
ewe Pek enue
Re Deren Hosen”
dec stor hic ke
A
reegoregA
Anais
vs s
[dr
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
BRISTOL, SS. BRISTOL, SS SUPERIOR COURT + SUPERIOR COURT
FILED CIVIL ACTION
. NO. 1773CV01031
OCT 1 0 2018
MARC J. SANTOS, ESQ.
ANNE HARTNETT, TOS, ESQ.
PLAINTIFF —CLERK/MAGISTRATE
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR
vs. JUDGMENT ON THE
PLEADINGS
CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION
AND DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
DEFENDANTS
Now comes the Plaintiff, pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Massachusetts Rules of Civil
Procedure and Superior Court Standing Order No. 1-96(4), and moves for judgment on the
pleadings in her favor, to the effect that the decision of the Civil Service Commission denying
the Plaintiff's reclassification appeal, upon which this action is based, was contrary to the
evidence admitted in the record, arbitrary or capricious, not supported by substantial evidence,
unwarranted on the record, constituted an abuse of discretion, denied the Plaintiff due process of
law and/or was otherwise not in accordance with law. As grounds therefor, the Plaintiff relies on
the reasons stated in her Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the
Pleadings filed herewith, in conjunction with the Administrative Record of the proceedings
before the Civil Service Commission in regard to said reclassification appeal ("AR") and the
Transcript of the Civil Service Commission hearing which took place on 10/03/2016, 10/06/2016
and 02/02/2017 regarding that appeal ("Tr. v.1, v.2 & v.3"), which have been filed in this action,
Q : pursuant to Superior Court Standing Order 1-96(2).
Sot |
‘ Peat i 3
SRG GEL 8
we d “at 3 \ i
Sx SUY3h
Document Filed Date
November 30, 2018
Case Filing Date
November 27, 2017
Category
Administrative Civil Actions
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
BSAA~ bse AW Hi~ | Th /7oPF0n 73 eos Sugper PeA oy Sb SANA 5 Oyler /F70r~ : ewe Pek enue Re Deren Hosen” dec stor hic ke A reegoregA Anais vs s [dr COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS BRISTOL, SS. BRISTOL, SS SUPERIOR COURT + SUPERIOR COURT FILED CIVIL ACTION . NO. 1773CV01031 OCT 1 0 2018 MARC J. SANTOS, ESQ. ANNE HARTNETT, TOS, ESQ. PLAINTIFF —CLERK/MAGISTRATE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR vs. JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION AND DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, DEFENDANTS Now comes the Plaintiff, pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure and Superior Court Standing Order No. 1-96(4), and moves for judgment on the pleadings in her favor, to the effect that the decision of the Civil Service Commission denying the Plaintiff's reclassification appeal, upon which this action is based, was contrary to the evidence admitted in the record, arbitrary or capricious, not supported by substantial evidence, unwarranted on the record, constituted an abuse of discretion, denied the Plaintiff due process of law and/or was otherwise not in accordance with law. As grounds therefor, the Plaintiff relies on the reasons stated in her Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed herewith, in conjunction with the Administrative Record of the proceedings before the Civil Service Commission in regard to said reclassification appeal ("AR") and the Transcript of the Civil Service Commission hearing which took place on 10/03/2016, 10/06/2016 and 02/02/2017 regarding that appeal ("Tr. v.1, v.2 & v.3"), which have been filed in this action, Q : pursuant to Superior Court Standing Order 1-96(2). Sot | ‘ Peat i 3 SRG GEL 8 we d “at 3 \ i Sx SUY3h