arrow left
arrow right
  • NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION IN ITS CAPACI vs GULFSTREAM DEVELOPMENT GROUP LLC A FLORIDA LIMITED et al document preview
  • NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION IN ITS CAPACI vs GULFSTREAM DEVELOPMENT GROUP LLC A FLORIDA LIMITED et al document preview
  • NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION IN ITS CAPACI vs GULFSTREAM DEVELOPMENT GROUP LLC A FLORIDA LIMITED et al document preview
  • NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION IN ITS CAPACI vs GULFSTREAM DEVELOPMENT GROUP LLC A FLORIDA LIMITED et al document preview
  • NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION IN ITS CAPACI vs GULFSTREAM DEVELOPMENT GROUP LLC A FLORIDA LIMITED et al document preview
  • NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION IN ITS CAPACI vs GULFSTREAM DEVELOPMENT GROUP LLC A FLORIDA LIMITED et al document preview
						
                                

Preview

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE i2TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR SARASOTA COUNTY, FLORIDA CTVIL DIVISION NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION BOARD, in its capacity as Liquidating Agent for CASE NO.: 2008-CA-004486 NC HURON RIVER AREA CREDIT UNION, a Michigan Corporation, Plaintiff, VS. ORRIS A. RODAHL and GULFSTREAM DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, Defendants. / PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S SECOND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS Plaintiff, National Credit Union Administration, in its capacity as liquidating agent of Huron River Area Credit Union (“NCUA”), by and through its undersigned counsel, pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.350, as and for its Response to the correspondingly numbered paragraphs of Defendant’s Second Request for Production of Documents, states: RESPONSES l. Ali such documents, to the extent that they exist and are in the care, custody or control of Plaintiff, have previously been produced. 2. All such documents, to the extent that they exist and are in the care, custody or control of Plaintiff, have previously been produced. 3. All such documents, to the extent that they exist and are in the care, custody or control of Plaintiff, have previously been produced. 4. All such documents, to the extent that they exist and are in the care, custody or control of Plaintiff, and are not subject to the attorney-client and/or work product privileges, have previously been produced or have been produced concurrent herewith. A privilege log has been served concurrent herewith. 19475 v_01 \ 1205220017 Filed for Record 06/17/2009 03:15 PM - Karen E. Rushing, Clerk of the Circuit Court - Sarasota County, FL - 2008 CA 004486 NC Dkt-24632010 Page 1 of 3CASE NO.: 2008-CA-004486 NC 5. All such documents, to the extent that they exist and are in the care, custody or control of Plaintiff, have been produced concurrent herewith. 6. All such documents, to the extent that they exist and are in the care, custody or control of Plaintiff, have previously been produced. 7. Plaintiff is not the author of the Material Loss Review of Huron River Area Credit Union, Report # 076-08-10, November 26, 2008 (hereinafter “Material Loss Report”), and therefore no such documents are in the care, custody or control of Plaintiff. Furthermore, Plaintiff objects to this request on the grounds that all documents created in connection with, concerning, pertaining or relating in any way to the NCUA’s examination and supervision of insured credit unions, including examination reports, internal memoranda and correspondence, are nonpublic records pursuant to 12 CFR 792.11, and the NCUA is legally prohibited from disclosing said documents pursuant to 12 CFR 792.40. 8. Plaintiff has no knowledge of which documents were used to support the findings in the Material Loss Report. Furthermore, Plaintiff objects to this request on the grounds that all documents created in connection with, concerning, pertaining or relating in any way to the NCUA’s examination and supervision of insured credit unions, including examination reports, intemal memoranda and correspondence, are nonpublic records pursuant to 12 CFR 792.11, and the NCUA is legally prohibited ftom disclosing said documents pursuant to 12 CFR 792.40. Inasmuch as Plaintiff has documents relating to Huron’s third-party relationship with the Construction Loan Company from 1997 to the present, they have previously been produced to Defendant. 9. Plaintiff has no knowledge of which documents were used to support the findings in the Material Loss Report. Furthermore, Plaintiff objects to this request on the grounds that all documents created in connection with, concerning, pertaining or relating in any way to the NCUA’s examination and supervision of insured credit unions, including examination reports, internal memoranda and correspondence, are nonpublic records pursuant to 12 CFR 792.11, and the NCUA is legally prohibited from disclosing said documents pursuant to 12 CFR 792.40. 10. Nosuch documents exist or are in the care, custody or control of Plaintiff. 11. ATi such documents, to the extent that they exist and are in the care, custody or control of Plaintiff, have previously been produced. 12. All such documents, to the extent that they exist and are in the care, custody or control of Plaintiff, have previously been produced. 19475 v_O1\ 120522.0017 Filed for Record 06/17/2009 03:15 PM - Karen E. Rushing, Clerk of the Circuit Court - Sarasota County, FL - 2008 CA 004486 NC Dkt-24632010 Page 2 of 3CASE NO.: 2008-CA-004486 NC 13. No such documents exist. Florida Bar N6- 328758 ROETZEL & ANDRESS, LPA P.O. Box 9748 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33310 Tel.: (954) 462-4150 Fax: (954) 462-4260 Attorney for Plaintiff Islitow@ralaw.com CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 17th day of June, 2009, a true and correct copy of the foregoing was furnished via overnight mail to: G. Wrede Kirkpatrick, Esquire Attorney for Defendant Orris A. Rodahi Conwell Kirkpatrick, P.A. 2701 North Rocky Point Drive, Suite 1200 Tampa, FL 33607 a, Laurence §. Litow, Esdui 19475 v_O1 \ §203522.0017 Filed for Record 06/17/2009 03:15 PM - Karen E. Rushing, Clerk of the Circuit Court - Sarasota County, FL - 2008 CA 004486 NC Dkt-24632010 Page 3 of 3