arrow left
arrow right
  • Raymond M Geraghty v. Airco, Inc., Amchem Products, Inc.,, American Crane & Equipment Corp, Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corporation, Blh, Incorporated, Borgwarner Morse Tec Llc, Bucyrus International, Inc.,, Caterpillar Global Mining, Llc, Caterpillar Inc., Individually And As Successor To, Caterpillar Industrial Inc. Individually And, Certainteed Corporation, Clark Equipment Company, Cnh America, As Successor In Interest To, Crane Co.,, Crosby Valve Llc, Cummins, Inc, Deutz Corporation, Fiatallis North America, Inc, Fmc Corporation,, Ford Motor Company, General Electric Company, Honeywell International, Inc.,, Itt Llc.,, Kobelco Construction Machinery U.S.A., Inc, Link-Belt Construction Equipment Company, Marion Power Shovel Company, Owens-Illinois, Inc, P & H Mining Equipment, A Subsidiary Of, Perkins Engines, Inc, Pettibone Michigan, Llc,, Pfizer, Inc. (Pfizer),, Pneumo Abex Llc, Successor In Interest, Roebuck And Co., Sears, Terex Corporation,, The Manitowoc Company, Inc., U.S. Rubber Company (Uniroyal),, Union Carbide Corporation, Yorktown Crane CorporationTorts - Asbestos document preview
  • Raymond M Geraghty v. Airco, Inc., Amchem Products, Inc.,, American Crane & Equipment Corp, Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corporation, Blh, Incorporated, Borgwarner Morse Tec Llc, Bucyrus International, Inc.,, Caterpillar Global Mining, Llc, Caterpillar Inc., Individually And As Successor To, Caterpillar Industrial Inc. Individually And, Certainteed Corporation, Clark Equipment Company, Cnh America, As Successor In Interest To, Crane Co.,, Crosby Valve Llc, Cummins, Inc, Deutz Corporation, Fiatallis North America, Inc, Fmc Corporation,, Ford Motor Company, General Electric Company, Honeywell International, Inc.,, Itt Llc.,, Kobelco Construction Machinery U.S.A., Inc, Link-Belt Construction Equipment Company, Marion Power Shovel Company, Owens-Illinois, Inc, P & H Mining Equipment, A Subsidiary Of, Perkins Engines, Inc, Pettibone Michigan, Llc,, Pfizer, Inc. (Pfizer),, Pneumo Abex Llc, Successor In Interest, Roebuck And Co., Sears, Terex Corporation,, The Manitowoc Company, Inc., U.S. Rubber Company (Uniroyal),, Union Carbide Corporation, Yorktown Crane CorporationTorts - Asbestos document preview
						
                                

Preview

/SI AARONSON Aaronson Rappaport Feinstein RAPPAPORT & Deutsch, LLP Alexandra Y. Bystritskaya (212)593-8480 aybystritskaya@arfdlaw.com December 26,2019 WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 Att: Chris Romanelli, Esq. Re: RAYMOND M. GERAGHTY v. AIRCO,INC., et al., Index No.: 190149/18 File No.: 5012.726 Dear Mr. Romanelli: Since the plaintiff failed to adduce any evidence ofexposure to asbestos containing materials manufactured, sold, or distributed by Ford and pursuant to your prior agreement to dismiss the action against Ford, attached please find a proposed Unopposed Summary Judgment Motion and Order("USJM")as to Ford Motor Company. Kindly sign the attached USJM and return to our office for filing with the Court. Pursuant to paragraph XVI.5 of the Case Management Order, if you are unwilling to sign the attached document, inform me of the basis of plaintiffs' claims against my client individually, in writing, with a copy to the Special Master, within 10 days. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, Alexandra Y. Bystritskaya AYB\dja NEW YORK CITY 1600 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10016 1212.593.6700 LONG ISLAND 1390 Old Country Road, Garden City, NY 11530 1516.281.9600 www.arfdlaw.com SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK CITY NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S Part 13 (Mendez) This Document Relates To: RAYMOND M. GERAGHTY, UNOPPOSED SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND Plaintiff(s), ORDER - against - AIRCO,INC., et al., INDEX No.: 190149/2018 Defendant(s). x WHEREFORE, defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint and cross-claims against defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is ORDERED that all claim and cross-claims against defendant, FORD MOTOR COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs. Dated: New York, New York ,2019 By: Christopher Romanelli, Esq By: Alexandra Y. Bystritskaya, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C, AARONSON RAPPAPORT FEINSTEIN & 700 Broadway DEUTSCH,LLP New York, NY 10003 Attorneys for Defendant 212-558-5500 Ford Motor Company Counsel for: Plaintiffs 600 Third Avenue New York, New York 10016 T: 212-593-6700 F: 212-593-6970 SO ORDERED: HON. MANUEL J. MENDEZ J.S.C. {02228934.DOCX