Preview
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/26/2018 11:40 AM INDEX NO. 154374/2018
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/26/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 8
____________ _________________ ----------------------x
YVETTE MCCLAMB, Index No. 154374/2018
(ECF)
Plaintiff, Motion Sequence No. 1
v.
HOUSING PARTNERSHIP DEVELOPMENT AFFIRMATION OF
CORPORATION, KALAHARI CONDOMINIUM, SCOTT H. BERNSTEIN, ESQ.
THE BOARD OF MANAGERS OF KALAHARI IN SUPPORT OF
CONDOMINIUM, WALLACK MANAGEMENT MOTION TO DISMISS
CO., INC., RNC INDUSTRIES, LLC AND WEST
NEW YORK RESTORATION OF CT, INC.,
Assigned Judge: Lynn R. Kotler
Defendants.
Return Date: October 29, 2018
---------------------------------------------------------------x
I, Scott H. Bernstein, an attorney duly admitted to the practice of law before the Courts of the
State of New York, hereby affirms the following to be true under the penalty of perjury pursuant to
CPLR § 2106:
1. I am an attorney at law and counsel at the firm of Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young,
LLP, the attorneys of record for Defendant West New York Restoration of CT, Inc. ("West New
York") in the above-captioned action. As such, I am fully familiar with the facts and circumstances of
the case and proceedings heretofore.
2. I make this affirmation in support of West New York Restoration of CT, Inc.'s motion
for an Order (1) dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint and all Cross-Claims and Cross-Complaints asserted
against West New York by the other Defendants in the above-captioned action and (2) providing such
other and further relief to West New York as the Court may deem just, prope , and equitable.
3. Annexed hereto as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of the Complaint filed by
Plaintiff Yvette McClamb in the above-captioned action.
# 3700980 v. 1
1 of 69
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/26/2018 11:40 AM INDEX NO. 154374/2018
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/26/2018
4. Annexed hereto as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of the Answer with Cross-Claims
filed Defendant RNC Industries, LLC in the above-captioned action.
by
5. Annexed hereto as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of Response Personnel, Inc. v.
Aschenbrenner, Index No. 106590/2008, 2014 NY Slip Op. 31948(U) (Sup. Ct. N.Y. Cnty. July 17,
2014) (Branstein, J.).
6. Annexed hereto as Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of Tripp & Co. v. Bank of New
York, Inc., Index No. 114110/2009, 28 Misc.3d 1211(A) (Sup. Ct. N.Y. Cnty. July 14, 2010) (Bernard,
J.).
7. Annexed hereto as Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of Digital Broadcasting Corp. v.
Ladenburg, Thalmann & Co., Inc., Index No. 117041/2005, 19 Misc. 3d 1130(A) (Sup. Ct. N.Y. Ctny.
April 21, 2008) (Lowe, J.).
ATTORNEY'S CERTIFICATION
The undersigned hereby certifies that, to the best of the undersigned's knowledge, information
and belief formed after reasonable inquiry under the circumstances, the presentation of the within
Affirmation of Scott H. Bernstein, Esq. in Support of Motion to Dismiss or the contentions contained
therein are not frivolous as defmed in 22 NYCRR § 130-1.1(c).
Dated: New York, New York
October 26, 2018 Respectfully submitted,
Sco t H. Bernstein, Esq.
STRADLEY RONON STEVENS & YOUNG, LLP
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT, WEST NEW YORK
RESTORATION OF CT, INC.
100 Park Avenue, Suite 2000
New York, New York 10017
Telephone: (212) 812-4132
Facsimile: (646) 682-7180
Sbernstein@stradley.com
2
# 3700980 v. 1
2 of 69
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/26/2018 11:40 AM INDEX NO. 154374/2018
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/26/2018
TO:
RHEINGOLD GIUFFRA RUFFO & PLOTKIN LLP
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF YVETTE MCCLAMB
Jeremy A. Hellman, Esq.
29th
551 Fifth Avenue,
New York, New York 10176
PERRY, VAN ETTEN, ROZANSKI & PRIMAVERA, LLP
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT/CROSS-CLAIMANT
RNC INDUSTRIES, LLC
Kenneth J. Kutner, Esq.
60 Broad Street, Suite 3600A
New York, New York 10004
MARGARET G. KLEIN & ASSOCIATES
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS/CROSS-CLAIMANTS
KALAHARI CONDOMINIUM, THE BOARD OF MANAGERS OF KALAHARI
CONDOMINIUM, AND WALLACK MANAGEMENT CO., INC.
Carol Morell, Esq.
2nd
200 Madison Avenue, FlOOr
New York, New York 10016
DEVITT SPELLMAN BARRETT, LLP
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT/CROSS-CLAIMANT
HOUSING PARTNERSHIP DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Kelly E. Wright, Esq.
50 Route 11, Suite 314
Smithtown, New York 11787
3
#3700980 v. 1
3 of 69
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/26/2018 11:40 AM INDEX NO. 154374/2018
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/26/2018
EXHIBIT 1
4 of 69
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/26/2018 11:40 AM INDEX NO. 154374/2018
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/26/2018
FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK INDEX NO. 154374/2018
: 05 /10 /2018 02 : O6 PM|
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/10/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK -
YVETTE MCCLAMB, Plaintiff designates NEW YORK COUNTY
County as the place of trial
Plaintiff,
PLAINTIFF DEMANDS
-against- TRIAL BY JURY
Index No.:
HOUSING PARTNERSHIP DEVELOPLMENT Date Filed:
CORPORATION, KALAHARI CONDOMINIUM,
THE BOARD OF MANAGERS OF KALAHARI
CONDOMINIUM, WALLACK MANAGEMENT SUMMONS
CO., INC., RNC INDUSTRIES, LLC. and WEST
NEW YORK RESTORATION OF CT, INC. The basis of the venue is
Plaintiff's residence &
Defendants. location of the accident
Plaintiff resides at:
'
1385 5 Avenue, Apt. 6B
New York, NY 10029
TO THE ABOVE NAMED DEFENDANTS:
YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED to answer the complaint in this action and to serve
a copy of your answer, or, if the complaint is not served with this summes, to serve a notice of
appearance, on the Plaintiff's Attorney(s) within 20 days after the service of this summons.
exclusive of the day of service (or within 30 days after the service is complete ifthis summons is
not personally delivered to you within the State of New York); and in the case of your failure to
appear or answer, judgment will be taken against you by default for the reliefdemanded in the
complaint.
Dated: New York, New York
May 10, 2018
Yours, etc.,
RHElNGOLD GIUFFRA RUFFO
& PLOTKIN LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff
By:
Jeremy A. Hellman, Esq.
Office & P.O. Address
29th
551 Fifth Avenue, Fl.
New York, N.Y. 10176
(212) 684-1880
DEFENDANTS'
ADDRESSES ON NEXT PAGE
Defendants'
Addresses:
1 of 14
5 of 69
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/26/2018 11:40 AM INDEX NO. 154374/2018
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/26/2018
INDEX NO. 154374/2018
[FILED : NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/1072018 02 : 0 6 PlMÛ
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/10/2018
KALAHARI CONDOMINIUM
116*
40 West St, New York, NY
THE BOARD OF MANAGERS OF KALAHARI CONDOMINIUM
40 West 116th St, New York, NY
S_epryiceviaSecretaryofState:
HOUSING PARTNERSHIP DEVELOPLMENT CORPORATION
36*
242 West St.,Third Floor
New York, NY 10018
WALLACK MANAGEMENT CO., INC.
4th
441 Lexington Avenue,
New York, NY 10017
RNC INDUSTRIES, LLC.
720 Blue Point Rd.
Holtsville, NY 11742
WEST NEW YORK RESTORATION OF CT, INC.
1800 Boston Rd.
Bronx, NY 10460
2 of 14
6 of 69
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/26/2018 11:40 AM INDEX NO. 154374/2018
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/26/2018
INDEX NO. 154374/2018
[FILED : NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/10/2018 02:0 6 PM)
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/10/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
YVETTE MCCLAMB, Index No.:
Plaintiff,
-against-
HOUSING PARTNERSHIP DEVELOPLMENT
CORPORATION, KALAHARI CONDOMINIUM,
THE BOARD OF MANAGERS OF KALAHARI
CONDOMINIUM, WALLACK MANAGEMENT VERIFIED COMPLAINT
CO., INC., RNC INDUSTRIES, LLC. and WEST
NEW YORK RESTORATION OF CT, INC.
Defendants.
Plaintiff, by her attorneys, RHEINGOLD GIUFFRA RUFFFO & PLOTKIN, LLP, as and
for her Verified Cersplaint against defendants herein, respectfolly sets forth and alleges the
following, upon information and belief:
1. That at all times hereinafter mentioned, plaintiff YVETTE MCCLAMB
(her-iñaRer referred to as plaintiff "MCCLAMB") was and stillis a resident of the County, City
and State of New York.
2. That at all times hereinaAer mentioned defendant HOUSING PARTNERSHIP
DEVELOPLMENT CORPORATION, (hereinafter referred to as defendant "HOUSING") was
and stillis a domestic non for profit corporation, duly organized and avicting under and by virtue
of the laws of the State of New York.
3. That at all times hereinafter mentioned, defendant HOUSING was the owner of a
certain building premises known and designated as 40 West 116th Street, in the County, City and
State of New York.
3 of 14
7 of 69
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/26/2018 11:40 AM INDEX NO. 154374/2018
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/26/2018
INDEX NO. 154374/2018
[FILED : NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05710/2018 02 : 06 PM)
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/10/2018
4. That at all times hereinafter mentioned, defendant HOUSING controlled the
aforesaid building premises.
5. That at all times hereinafter mentioned, defendant HOUSING supervised the
aforesaid building premises.
6. That at all times hereinafter mentioned, defendant HOUSING reañaged the
aforesaid building premises.
7. That at all times hereinafter mentioned, defendant HOUSING maintained the
aforesaid building premises.
8. That at all times hereinafter mention defendant KALAHARI CONDOMINIUM
(hereinafter referred to as defendant "KALAHARI") is a condominium association organized
and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of New York and is authorized to
conduct business in the State ofNew York.
9. That at all times hereinafter mention defendant THE BOARD OF MANAGERS
OF KALAHARI CONDOMINIUM, (hereinafter referred to as defendant "MANAGERS")
administers the affairs and operations ofdefendant KALAHARI.
10. That at all times hereinafter mention defendant WALLACK MANAGEMENT
CO, INC. (hereinafter referred to as defendant "WALLACK") was domestic business
corporation duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of New
York.
11. That at alltimes hereinafter mentioned, defendant WALLACK was the managing
agent of a certain building premises known and designated as 40 West 116th Street, in the
County, City and State ofNew York.
-2-
4 of 14
8 of 69
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/26/2018 11:40 AM INDEX NO. 154374/2018
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/26/2018
INDEX NO. 154374/2018
(FILED : NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05 /10/2018 02 : 0 6 P
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/10/2018
12. That at all times herciñafter deSadant WALLACK operated the
mentioned,
aforesaid building premises.
13. That at all times hereinafter mentioned, defendant WALLACK controlled the
aforesaid building premises.
14. That at all times hereinafter mentioned, defendant WALLACK supervised the
aforesaid building premises.
15. That at all times hereinafter mentioned, defendant WALLACK managed the
aforesaid building premises.
16. That at all times hereinafter mentioned, defendant WALLACK maintained the
aforesaid building premises.
17. That at all times hereinafter mention defendant RNC INDUSTRIES, LLC.
(hereinafter referred to as defendant "RNC") was a domestic limited liability compañy duly
organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of New York.
18. Upon information and belief, that at all times herciñafter mentioned defendant
RNC was in the business of, among other things, general contracting, renovation, repair and/or
construction work.
19. That at all times hereinsfter mentioñêd and sometime prior thereto, defeñdañt
RNC, by its agents, servants and/or employees, made applications for certain permits and/or
licenses from The City of New York, itsagents, servants and/or employees, granting defendant
116d'
permission and/or license to perform certain work at and in the vicinity of 40 West Street,
and the abutting sidewalk thereat, in the County, City and State of New York.
20. That at all times hereinafter mentioned and sometime prior thereto, The City of
New York, by itsagents, servants and/or employees, did issue certain permits and/or licenses to
- 3 •
5 of 14
9 of 69
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/26/2018 11:40 AM INDEX NO. 154374/2018
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/26/2018
NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02 INDEX NO. 154374/2018
[FILED : 05/10 /2018 : 0 6 PM|
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/10/2012
defendant RNC, itsagents, servants and/or employees, granting said defendant permission and/or
license to perform certain work at and in the vicinity of the aforementioned location.
21. That at all times hereinafter mcatioñêd, and for a period of time prior thereto,
defeñdañt RNC was the general contractor with respect to the performance of certain
construction and/or renovation work being performed at the aforesaid building premises and the
abutting sidewalks thereat.
22. That at all times hereiñafter mentioned and sometime prior thereto, defendant
RNC, by itsagents, servants and/or employees, did perform certain work at and in the vicinity of
the aforementioned location.
23. That at all times hereinafter mentioned, defendant RNC by its agents, servants
premises'
and/or cmployees, operated the aforesaid building work site and the abutting sidewalks
thereat.
24. That at all times hereinafter mentioned, defendant RNC by its agents, servants
premises'
and/or employees, controlled the aforesaid building work site and the abutting
sidewalks thereat.
25. That at all times hereinafter deSnd==* its servants
mentioned, RNC, by agents,
premises'
and/or cmployees, supervised the aforesaid building work site and the abutting
sidewalks thereat.
26. That at all times hereinafter mentioned, defendant RNC by its agents, servants
premises'
and/or employees, managed the aforesaid building work site and the abutting
sidewalks thereat.
.4-
6 of 14
10 of 69
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/26/2018 11:40 AM INDEX NO. 154374/2018
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/26/2018
FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK /2018 02 INDEX NO. 154374/2018
: 05/10 : 0 6 PB
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/10/2018
27. That at all times hereinafter mentioñcd, defendant RNC, by its agents, servants
premises'
and/or employees, maintained the aforesaid tui!d!;g work site and the abutting
sidewalks thereat.
28. That at all times hereinafter menriced, and for a period of time prior thereto,
defendant RNC by its agents, servants and/or employees, entered into certain contracts and/or
agreements with defendant HOUSING to perform certain services, including but not !imited to
construction and/or renovation work at the afarcsaid building premises and the abutting
sidewalks thereat.
29. That at all times hereinafter mentioned, and for a period of time prior thereto,
defendet RNC by its agents, servants and/or cmployces, entered into certain contracts and/or
agreements with defendant KALAHARI to perform certain services, including but not limited to
construction and/or renovation work at the aforesaid building premises and the abutting
sidewalks thereat.
30. That at all times hereinafter mention«l, and for a period of time prior thereto,
defendant RNC by its agents, servants and/or employees, entered into certain contracts and/or
agreements with defendant WALLACK to perform certain services, including but not limited to
construction and/or reñovation work at the aforesaid building premises and the abutting
sidewalks thereat.
31. That at all times hercinancr mentioned, Defendant WEST NEW YORK
RESTORATION OF CT., INC ( hereiñafter "WEST NEW YORK") was and still is a foreign
corparation duly licensed and authorized to do business in the State ofNew York.
32. That at all times herciñaner mentioned, Defendant WEST NEW YORK was a
foreign corporation that derived substatia! revenue from interstate or internaticñal commerce
. 5.
7 of 14
11 of 69
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/26/2018 11:40 AM INDEX NO. 154374/2018
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/26/2018
INDEX NO. 154374/2018
(FILED : NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/1072018 02 : 0 6 PM)
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/10/2018
and expected or should reasonably have expected that ifitcommined a tortious act within the
State of New York that said tortious act would have conseqüêñces within the State of New York.
33. Upon information and belief, that at all times hereinafter mentioned defendant
WEST NEW YORK was in the business of,among other things, general contracting, rêñavation,
repair and/or construction work.
34. That at all times hereineher mentioned and sometime prior thereto, defendant
WEST NEW YORK, by its agents, servants and/or employees, made applications for certain
permits and/or licenses from The City of New York, its agents, servants and/or employees,
granting defendant permission and/or license to perform certain work at and in the vicinity of 40
11602
West Street, and the abutting sidewalk thereat, in the County, City and State of New York.
35. That at all times hereinafter mentioned and sometime prior thereto, The City of
New York, by its agents, servants and/or emplayees, did issue certain permits and/or licenses to
defendant WEST NEW YORK its agents, servants and/or employees, granting said defendant
permission and/or license to perform certain work at and in the vicinity of the aforementioned
location.
36. That at all times herciñafter mentioned, and for a period of time prior thereto,
defendant WEST NEW YORK was the general contractor with respect to the performance of
certain construction and/or renovatica work being performed at the aforesaid building premises
and the abutting sidewalks thereat.
37. That at all times hereinaher mentioned and sometime prior thereto, defendant
WEST NEW YORK, by its agents, servants and/or employees, did perform certain work at and
in the vicinity of the aforementioned location.
- 6 -
8 of 14
12 of 69
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/26/2018 11:40 AM INDEX NO. 154374/2018
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/26/2018
NEW YORK COUNTY INDEX NO. 154374/2018
ffILED : CLERK 0571072018 02:0 6 PM
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/10/2012
38. That at all times hereinafter mentioned, defendant WEST NEW YORK by its
premises'
agents, servants and/or employees, operated the aforesaid building work site and the
abutting sidewalks thereat.
39. That at all times hereiñaner mentioned, defendant WEST NEW YORK by its
premises'
agents, servants and/or emplüyees, controlled the aforesaid building work site and the
abutting sidewalks thereat.
40. That at all times hereinafter mentioned, defendant WEST NEW YORK, by its
premises'
agents, servants and/or employees, supervised the aforesaid building work siteand the
abutting sidewalks thereat.
41. That at all times hereinafter mentioned, defeñdañt WEST NEW YORK by its
premises'
agents, servants and/or employees, managed the aforesaid building work site and the
abutting sidewalks thereat.
42. That at all times hereinafter mentioned, defendant WEST NEW YORK, by its
premises'
agents, servants and/or employees, maintained the aforesaid building work site and the
abutting sidewalks thereat.
43. That at all times hereinafter menticñed, and for a period of time prior thereto,
defendant WEST NEW YORK by itsagents, servants and/or emplayees, entered into certain
contracts and/or agreemcats with deandant HOUSING to perform certain services, but
including
not limited to c0ñstruction and/or renovation work at the aforesaid building premises and the
abutting sidewalks thereat.
44. That at all times hereinafter menticñed, and for a period of time prior thereto,
defendant WEST NEW YORK by its agents, servants and/or employees, entered into certain
contracts and/or agreements with de6ndant KALAHARI to perform certain services, including
- 7 -
9 of 14
13 of 69
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/26/2018 11:40 AM INDEX NO. 154374/2018
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/26/2018
INDEX NO. 154374/2C18
[FILED: NEW -Ÿ¯ORK COUNTY CLERK 05 /10 /2018 02 : 0 6 PI4
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/10/2C18
but not limited to constrüetion and/or renovaticñ work at the aforesaid building premises and the
abutting sidewalks thereat.
45. That at all times hereinafter mentioned, and for a period of time prior thereto,
defendant WEST NEW YORK C by itsagents, servants and/or employees, entend into certain
contracts and/or agreements with defendant WALLACK to perform certain services, including
but not limited to construction and/or renovation work at the aforesaid bui!ding premises and the
abutting sidewalks thereat.
46. That at alltimes hercinaâer mentioned, defendants were under a duty to operate,
control, supervise, manage and maintain the aforesaid building premises and the abutting
sidewalks in a safe, lawful and proper fashióñ so that no persons lawfully thereat would be
caused to sustain serious injuries.
47 That at all times hereinafter mentioned, the aforesaid sidewalk was and still is a
public sidewalk and thoroughfare for use by the general public.
48. That at all times hereinafter mentioned, plaintiff MCCLAMB was a lawful
pedestrian at the aforesaid location.
49. That on or about the 22nd day of August 2017 while plaintiff MCCLAMB was
lawfully wa!king on the sidewalk at the aforesaid location, she was caused to fallthereat, as a
result of which she sustained severe personal injuries.
50. The foegoing occurrence and re3üitant iñjuries to plaintiff MCCLAMB due to
the carelessness, recklessness and negligence of the defendants their agents, servants and/or
employees, in the ownership, operation, management, maintenance and control of said premises
and the abutting sidewalks; in causing, permitting and allowing the aforesaid sidewalk to be,
become and remain in a broken, cracked, raised, uneven, worn condition; in causing, permitting
10 of 14
14 of 69
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/26/2018 11:40 AM INDEX NO. 154374/2018
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/26/2018
NEW YORK COUNTY INDEX NO. 154374/2018
[FILED : CLERK 05/10/2018 02 : 0 6 PM|
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/10/2018
and/or allowing said sidewalk to be, become and remain in a dangerous, hazardous and trap like
condition; in causing, permitting and/or allowing the aforesaid sidewalk to be, become and
remain in a broken, hazardous and dangerous condition, thereby creating and cóñstituting a trap,
hazard and tripping condition for persons lawfully walking thereat; in failing to train, properly
train and/or adequately train its agents, servants and/or employees, in the safe and proper
execution of their job; in failing to make the due, timely and necessary inspections of the
aforesaid area; in allowing the aforesaid dangerous and hazardous conditions to exist with actual
and constructive notice; in causing and creating the aforesaid dangerous and hazardous
condition; in failing to remedy, properly remedy and/or timely remedy the aforesaid dangerous
and hazardous conditions although it had or should have had notice thereof in view of the fact
that said conditions existed for some time prior to the occurrence herein; in failing to place any
signs, barricades or other warning devices thereat to prevent plaintiff and others from traversing
in to repair, properly repair and timely repair the aforesaid conditiens; in
thereat; failing
the aforesaid place sometime prior to the occurrence; in failing to remedy,
improperly repairing
and/or timely remedy the aforesaid dangerous and hazardous conditions
properly remedy
although ithad or should have had notice thereof in view of the fact that said conditions existed
for some time prior to the occurrence herein and the defendants their agents, servants and/or
created said conditions; in violating the applicable laws, rules, statutes, ordinances
employees,
and regulations in such cases made and provided; in failing to provide a safe place for plaintiff
and others to walk and in otherwise negligent, careless and reckless allwithout any fault or
being
lack of care on the part of Plaintiff contributing thereto.
51. That as a result of the aforesaid occurrence, plaintiff MCCLAMB sustained
severe and permanent personal injuries to her head, limbs, body and nervous system and has
- 9 -
11 of 14
15 of 69
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/26/2018 11:40 AM INDEX NO. 154374/2018
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43