arrow left
arrow right
  • Hope Day Care, Llc, Theresa Giles as Manager of Hope Day Care, LLC, Tiara Love as Director of Hope Day Care, LLC v. New York State Office Of Children & Family Services Division Of Child Care ServicesSpecial Proceedings - CPLR Article 78 document preview
  • Hope Day Care, Llc, Theresa Giles as Manager of Hope Day Care, LLC, Tiara Love as Director of Hope Day Care, LLC v. New York State Office Of Children & Family Services Division Of Child Care ServicesSpecial Proceedings - CPLR Article 78 document preview
  • Hope Day Care, Llc, Theresa Giles as Manager of Hope Day Care, LLC, Tiara Love as Director of Hope Day Care, LLC v. New York State Office Of Children & Family Services Division Of Child Care ServicesSpecial Proceedings - CPLR Article 78 document preview
  • Hope Day Care, Llc, Theresa Giles as Manager of Hope Day Care, LLC, Tiara Love as Director of Hope Day Care, LLC v. New York State Office Of Children & Family Services Division Of Child Care ServicesSpecial Proceedings - CPLR Article 78 document preview
						
                                

Preview

At a Motion Term of the Supreme Court held in and for the County of Onondaga at the Courthouse located in Syracuse, New York, on the 1st day of November, 2017. PRESENT: ANTHONY J. PARIS STATE OF NEW YORK SUPREME COURT ONONDAGA COUNTY ---------------------------------------------------------------- In the Matter of the Application of HOPE DAY CARE, LLC, THERESA GILES, as Manager of HOPE DAY CARE, LLC, TIARA LOVE, as Director of HOPE DAY CARE, ORDER AND JUDGMENT Petitioners, v. Index No.: 3975/2017 RJI No.: 33-17-2786 NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES DIVISION OF CHILD CARE SERVICES, Respondent. For a Judgment Pursuant to Article 78 Of the Civil Practice Law and Rules ---------------------------------------------------------------- WHEREAS, the above captioned Article 78 proceeding was commenced by the Petitioners, HOPE DAY CARE, LLC, THERESA GILES, as Manager of HOPE DAY CARE, LLC, TIARA LOVE, as Director of HOPE DAY CARE, by filing and serving a Notice of Petition, dated August 25, 2017 and a Verified Petition, with exhibits, dated August 25, 2017 and a Memorandum of Law, dated August 25, 2017; and WHEREAS, the Respondent, NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES DIVISION OF CHILD CARE SERVICES, filed and served a Verified Answer and Return, dated October 16, 2017 and a Memorandum of Law, dated October 16, 2017; and WHEREAS, the Petitioners, HOPE DAY CARE, LLC, THERESA GILES, as Manager of HOPE DAY CARE, LLC, TIARA LOVE, as Director of HOPE DAY CARE filed and served a Verified Reply with Exhibits, dated October 27, 2017, and THE MATTER having come on to be heard before the Court, Hon. Anthony J. Paris, on November 1, 2017 and a review of the documents filed by the parties having been made; and The Petitioners having appeared by Cohen, Compagni, Beckman, Appler & Knoll, PLCC, Laura Spring, Esq. of counsel; and The Respondent, having appeared by and through the New York State Office of the Attorney General, Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman, Assistant Attorney General Bonnie Gail Levy, Esq., of counsel; and AFTER DUE DELIBERATION THEREON, a decision having been rendered by the Court, Honorable Anthony J. Paris, on November 1, 2017; NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY: ORDERED, the Petition against Respondent, NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES DIVISION OF CHILD CARE SERVICES, is dismissed in its entirety, as set forth by this Court in its Decision, on November 1, 2017, a transcript of which is annexed hereto and made a part hereof, on the basis that Respondent’s decision to revoke Petitioners’ day care license, given the magnitude and seriousness of Petitioners’ violations and its violation history, was not arbitrary and capricious, was supported by a rational basis, and was not so unfair as to be shocking to the judicial conscience; and it is further ORDERED, that the temporary restraining order, now in existence, allowing Petitioners to continue operation of the day care center, shall remain in effect, conditioned upon Petitioners filing and perfecting an appeal within 60 days of the filing of this Order and Judgment and service of the same, with Notice of Entry, upon the Petitioners; and it is further ORDERED, the Petitioners are to continue to maintain liability insurance and provide proof of said coverage on a monthly basis to Respondent’s counsel, Assistant Attorney General Bonnie Gail Levy, Esq. SO ORDERED. DATED: _____________, 2017. Syracuse, New York ______________________________ HON. ANTHONY J. PARIS Supreme Court Justice ENTER.