On June 24, 2015 a
Defendants' Motion to Extend Motion for Summary Judgment Hea - MOTION - EXTEND
was filed
involving a dispute between
Doe I, John,
and
Anderson, Alexander A.,
Anderson, Levonna C.,
Anderson, William C.,
The Anderson Private School,
for OTHER PERSONAL INJURY
in the District Court of Dallas County.
Preview
CAUSE NO, DC-15-07174
JOHN DOE I, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT
FRIEND OF JOHN DOE II, A MINOR
Plaintiffs,
IN THE DISTRICT COURT
eaeaeee
vs.
44TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
THE ANDERSON PRIVATE SCHOOL, WILLIAM
C. ANDERSON, INDIVIDUALLY, LEVONNA C.
ANDERSON, INDIVIDUALLY, ALEXANDER A.
ANDERSON, INDIVIDUALLY, RIPLEY
ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND JIM PATTISON
US,A,, INC.
Defendants.
(0) 2 GO? CO) CO) GO) LO) GU Ca WO)
DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS
DEFENDANT RIPLEY ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND JIM PATTISON U.S.A, INC.’S
MOTION TO EXTEND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING DEADLINE
Ripley Entertainment, Inc. and Jim Pattison U.S.A., Inc. (hereinafter “Defendants”) file
this Motion to Extend Motion for Summary Judgment Hearing Deadline, and respectfully show
the Court as follows.
Defendants would show that the deadline for the court to hear Motions for Summary
Judgment is currently December 16, 2016. Defendants have filed Motions for Summary Judgment
in a timely manner that would allow for these motions to be heard by this date in accordance with
the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. However, the court’s availability does not allow for the
motions to be heard prior to the December 16, 2016, deadline. Defendant has requested that the
hearings be scheduled as soon as the court is able to place them on it on its docket, and the court is
working with the Defendants to schedule the hearing(s).
Defendant requests that, based on the court’s availability limitations, the court extend the
deadline to hear Motions for Summary Judgment to allow for the timely-filed motions to be heard.
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO EXTEND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING DEADLINE PAGE 1
0287/78669CONCLUSION & PRAYER
Wherefore, premises considered, Defendant requests that the court extend the deadline by
which Motions for Summary Judgment may be heard to allow for Defendants’ timely-filed
motions to be heard by the court, and for all such further relief that this Court deems just and
proper.
Respectfully submitted,
WALTERS, BALIDO & Bas LLP
i
Document Filed Date
November 22, 2016
Case Filing Date
June 24, 2015
Category
OTHER PERSONAL INJURY
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.