arrow left
arrow right
  • Newton, Patsy et al  vs. Enloe Medical Center(35) Unlimited Other non-PI/PD/WD Tort document preview
  • Newton, Patsy et al  vs. Enloe Medical Center(35) Unlimited Other non-PI/PD/WD Tort document preview
  • Newton, Patsy et al  vs. Enloe Medical Center(35) Unlimited Other non-PI/PD/WD Tort document preview
  • Newton, Patsy et al  vs. Enloe Medical Center(35) Unlimited Other non-PI/PD/WD Tort document preview
						
                                

Preview

1 ROBERT H. ZIMMERMAN, BAR NO. 84345 SCHUERING ZIMMERMAN & DOYLE, LLP 2 400 University Avenue Sacramento, California 95825-6502 3 (916) 567-0400 11/23/2020 FAX: 568-0400 4 5 Attorneys for Defendant ENLOE MEDICAL CENTER 6 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF BUTTE 9 10 PATSY NEWTON, individually; HAROLD ) NO. 20CV01091 NEWTON, individually; SUZANNE ) 11 BOLDEN, individually, ) Assigned to Judge Tamara L. ) Mosbarger for All Purposes 12 Plaintiffs, ) ) DECLARATION OF ALAINA T. DICKENS 13 vs. ) IN SUPPORT OF REPLY TO ) OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL 14 ENLOE MEDICAL CENTER; and DOES 1 - ) PLAINTIFF'S FURTHER RESPONSES TO 50, et al., ) ENLOE MEDICAL CENTER'S REQUEST 15 ) FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, Defendants. ) SET TWO 16 ______________________________________ ) Date: November 25, 2020 17 Time: 9:00 a.m. Dept: 1 18 Action Filed: May 29, 2020 19 Trial Date: December 14, 2020 20 21 I, ALAINA T. DICKENS, declare: 22 1. I am an attorney at law licensed to practice in the State of California. I am a 23 member of the law firm of Schuering Zimmerman & Doyle, LLP, attorneys of record for 24 Defendant ENLOE MEDICAL CENTER. I have personal knowledge of the matters contained 25 herein and if called to testify, I could and would competently do so. 26 2. On November 13, 2020, we filed our ex parte application for an order 27 shortening time to hear its motions to compel further responses to requests for admission, 28 set one; form interrogatories, set two; and request for production of documents, set two. 01302428.WPD 1 DECL. ISO REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO ENLOE’S MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO RFP, SET TWO 1 3. We had asked plaintiff to provide further responses to our discovery requests 2 by the end of the day on November 13, 2020. 3 4. Having filed our ex parte application prior to the deadline for plaintiff to 4 respond, we understood we would withdraw our motions in the event plaintiff provided 5 satisfactory responses. 6 5. We received no further responses. 7 6. Additionally, there was no attempt by plaintiff's counsel to contact me to 8 discuss the ex parte application. 9 7. However, because of the proximity of trial in this case, December 14, 2020, it 10 was imperative we get our motions on file. 11 8. Additionally, we had to provide plaintiff's counsel with notice of the 12 November 16, 2020 hearing on our ex parte application no later than 10:00 a.m. on 13 November 13, 2020. 14 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the 15 foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 23rd day of November, 2020, at Sacramento, 16 California. 17 18 ALAINA T. DICKENS SBN 306006 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 01302428.WPD 2 DECL. ISO REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO ENLOE’S MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO RFP, SET TWO