arrow left
arrow right
  • First Northern Bank of Dixon vs. Constant Velocity Trans. civil document preview
  • First Northern Bank of Dixon vs. Constant Velocity Trans. civil document preview
  • First Northern Bank of Dixon vs. Constant Velocity Trans. civil document preview
  • First Northern Bank of Dixon vs. Constant Velocity Trans. civil document preview
						
                                

Preview

a Camel AT-120 ATTORNEY ORPARTYWITHOUT ATTORNEY(Name,State oar number, and address): FOR COURTUSE ONLY | Daniel L. Egan (SBN 142631) Kathryne E. Baldwin (SBN 311052) WILKE, FLEURY, HOFFELT, GOULD & BIRNEY, LLP 400 Capitol Mall, Twenty-Second Floor Sacramento, CA, 95814 TELEPHONE NO. 916/441-2430 FAXNO.(Optional): 916/442-6664 E-MAILADDRESS(Optional): Kbaldwin@wilkefleury.com Superior Court ofc ATTORNEY FOR(Name):FIRST NORTHERN BANK OF DIXON County of Preatifornia SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Placer hy STREETADDRESS: 10820 Justice Center Drive WOV 15 2018 MAILING ADDRESS: PO Box 619072 E Jake Chatters cryanozipcooe: Roseville, CA, 95661 xecutive By: Officer & CI BRANCHNAME: Hon. Howard G. Gibson Courthouse y: A. McMahon, D PLAINTIFF: FIRST NORTHERN BANK OF DIXON DEFENDANT: CONSTANT VELOCITY TRANSMISSION LINES, INC., et al. CASE NUMBER: [X] RIGHT TO ATTACH ORDER AND ORDER FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OF SCV 0041366 ATTACHMENT AFTER HEARING aji4 [.] ORDER FOR ISSUANCE OF ADDITIONAL WRIT OF ATTACHMENT AFTER HEARING 1.a. The applicationof plaintiff (name): First Northern Bank ofDixon Aq for [X] aright to attachorder and order forissuance of writof attachment C] an order forissuance ofadditional writofattachment against the propertyof defendant (name): Sierra Passive Interface Engineering, Inc. xe4 came on forhearing as follows: - (1)Judge (name): | OUD 7. et / (2)Hearing date: NAVEMGTA- 15) 1 y Dept.: 32 LJ] Div.: L] Rm: b.The followingpersons were present atthe hearing: (1)L] Plaintiff (name): @ , laintiff's attorney (name): Daphie SCArk, SQ. 2)2)1 Defendant (name) (name): aye 4 [¥pD efendant's y attorney (name)(name): Ow Sea 5 Gens, €#R ( Nor Ccout 2.THE COURT FINDS |ELep 44 a. Defendant (specify name): Sierra Passive Interface Engineering isa [_] natural person L] partnership (_] unincorporated association XX] corporation (_]_ other (specify): b.The claim upon which the applicationisbased isone upon which an attachment may be issued. c. Plaintiff has established theprobable validityofthe claim upon which the attachment is based. d.The attachment isnot sought fora purpose other than the recovery on the claim upon which the attachment isbased. e.The amount to be secured by the attachment isgreater than zero. f. J Defendant failedto prove that all the property described in plaintiffs application isexempt from attachment. g. &]_ The followingproperty of defendant, described in plaintiffs application (1)] isexempt from attachment (specify): (2)X] isnot exempt from attachment (specify):Allassets of Defendant Sierra Passive Interface Engineering subject to levy h. L]_ The followingproperty, notdescribed inplaintiffsapplication, claimed by defendant tobe exempt (1)C] isexempt from attachment (specify): (2)(] isnot exempt from attachment (specify): i. X= Anundertaking inthe amountof:$ |0O, O60. oP icrequired before a writshall issue,and plaintiff L] has XX] has not filedan underaking inthatamount. j.A Right toAttach Order was issued on (date): lov EMBs IS, 2oI? pursuant to &X] Code ofCivilProcedure section 484.090 (on hearing) [] Code of CivilProcedure section 485.220 (exparte) k. £] _ other (specify): Page1 of 2 FoamAsproved‘or Judicial Council Ontonal Use RIGHT of California TO ATTACH ORDER AFTER HEARING AND ORDER “ote.s{