arrow left
arrow right
  • First Northern Bank of Dixon vs. Constant Velocity Trans. civil document preview
  • First Northern Bank of Dixon vs. Constant Velocity Trans. civil document preview
						
                                

Preview

yh SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF PLACER Date: August 2,2018 Time: 8:30 AM Judge: Todd Irby Dept:-bM 32. Reporter: Clerk: Yay lQ Gates First Northern Bank of Dixon vs.Constant Velocity Daniel Eqan WW eresent Counsel +o cw Transmission Lines, Inc.et al Sephorfoondes wfresent (ounce) fo rAL _] And related Cross Action(s) Case # S-CV-0041366 Brisson Vi phone Law and Motion Minutes Proceedings RE: rn: 2.4: IS (@ g; Z0am DY (| Dropped. Continued to___ (_]by Plaintiff[] by Defendant (_]by Stipulation [] by Court Amater argued and submitted. [_]Submitted on points and authorities without [_]argument [_]appearance. CJ Motion/Petition granted. [_] Motion/Petition denied. (J Demurrer [] sustained [] overruled [J without [] with leave to [[] amend [] answer. L_]Counsel appointed for: (_]Taken under submission. (J Debtor is sworn and retired with counsel for examination. ] Stipulation to[]judge Pro Tem [_]Commissioner executed in open court. ] Counsel for to prepare the written order and submit ittoopposing counsel forapproval as tocontent and form. Core loc” Oe, IS (Oust Cea nog Be Other ot fi d nor td The bid ruling isadopted as the ruling ofthe court, to wit: Plaintiff's application for right to attach order is denied without prejudice as there is no proof of service in the file that demonstrates defendant Constant Velocity Transmission Lines, Inc. has been served with the summons, complaint, or the current motion. QO 0 0 A