arrow left
arrow right
  • SAN FRANCISCO HOUSING AUTHORITY VS. TERRLYN ALBERT et al UNLAWFUL DETAINER - RESIDENTIAL document preview
  • SAN FRANCISCO HOUSING AUTHORITY VS. TERRLYN ALBERT et al UNLAWFUL DETAINER - RESIDENTIAL document preview
  • SAN FRANCISCO HOUSING AUTHORITY VS. TERRLYN ALBERT et al UNLAWFUL DETAINER - RESIDENTIAL document preview
  • SAN FRANCISCO HOUSING AUTHORITY VS. TERRLYN ALBERT et al UNLAWFUL DETAINER - RESIDENTIAL document preview
  • SAN FRANCISCO HOUSING AUTHORITY VS. TERRLYN ALBERT et al UNLAWFUL DETAINER - RESIDENTIAL document preview
  • SAN FRANCISCO HOUSING AUTHORITY VS. TERRLYN ALBERT et al UNLAWFUL DETAINER - RESIDENTIAL document preview
						
                                

Preview

mw San Francisco Superior Courts Information Technology Group Document Scanning Lead Sheet Sep-15-2005 8:28 am Case Number: CUD-05-613658 Filing Date: Sep-15-2005 8:27 Juke Box: 001 Image: 01282553 DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION SAN FRANCISCO HOUSING AUTHORITY VS. TERRLYN ALBERT et al 001001282553 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.” "ATIORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name Bad Acoress): TELEPHONE NO.: | Amold W. Evje Il (State Bar # #095124) 15) 861-¢ ‘Amold W. Evje II, Esq. bey 950 Oak Street kb San Francisco , California 94117 attorney For wane): San Francisco Housing Authority 6070 - nT ER £0 FOR COURT USE ONLY ent en cow CISCO mel Traer name Of court and hart Of procul cisinct end branch cour. any, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN Superior Court - Limited Jurisdiction Branch FRANCISCO.COUNTY ny ft" CLERK PLAINTIFFIPETITIONER: San Francisco Housing Authority DEFENDANTIRESPONDENT: Terrlyn Albert and Does 1-10 ——-| pproty CLERK REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL [1 Personat Injury, Property Damage, or Wrongful Death [li metor Vehicle — [__] Other C4 Family Law Eminent Domain ; CX] Other (specify: Unlawful Detainer CASE NUMBER: 613658 =A conformed copy will not be returned by the clerk untess a method of return Is provided with the document. - 4. TO THE CLERK: Please dismiss this action as follows: a. (1) 2] With prejudice (2) [J Without prejudice b. (1) J Complaint (2)[} Petition Qa Cross-complaint filed by (name): {4) Cross-complaint filed by (name): (5) ] Entire action of all parties and all causes of action (6) (J Other (specity):* Date: September 15, 2005 > ‘on (date): ‘on (date): OAL) (TYPE OF PRINT NAME OF [] ATTORNEY [] * NW cismissal requested ls ol specified parbes only, of specified causes of action only, oF of specified cross-complaints only, $0 state and identity the parties, causes of action, or cross-compiaints to be dismissed, x {SIGNATURE} Attomey or party without attomey for: PlaintiffPetitioner Cross-complainant (1 DefendanyRespondent 2. TO THE CLERK: Consent to the above dismissal is hereby given."* : > Ha cross-compiaint-or Response (Family Lew) rejief-is on file, the sttomey for jaingnt (respondent) must ‘sign thia consent if required by Code of Civil Procedure section 581 (i) or(). (SIGNATURE) Attorney or party without attomey for: (1) PlaintityPetitioner [CJ Cross-complainant ([) DefendantRespondent (To be completed by clark) 3. Dismissal entered as requested on (date): 4. [_] Dismissal entered on (date): as to only (name): 5. __] Dismissat not entered as requested for the following reasons (specify): 6.(_]J a. Attomey or party without attomey notified on (date): b. Attorney or party without [31 a copy to conform means to retum conformed copy Date: Clerk, by oromey ret notified. Filing party failed to provide . Deputy Form Adopted by Judiciat Councd of Cartomia: 982(5)(5) [Rev. January 1, 1997] Mandatory Forms REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL ‘Code of Cha Procedure, § 581 ot $04. Cal, Rates of Court, ruiea 363, 1233 LexisNexis® Aztomated California Judicial Council FormsBN RB I declare that: I am employed in the county of San Francisco, California. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within cause; my business address is: , 950 Oak Street. San Francisco, California 94117. On September 15, 2005, I served the within PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL the defendants in said action, by placing a true copy thereof in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, in the United States mail at SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA addressed as follows: (oo Asst. . TERRE’ 755 NISSOURT STREET S45 rari st Ste (10 S.F.. CA SF.CaQic I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct, and that this declaration was executed on September 15, 2005, at San Francisco, Jo L. Biel at (profeall.pl)