On January 06, 2005 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Doe, John,
Schuldner, Stan John Doe In C O Stan Schuldner Staten Island, Ny 10314,
and
Bayside Village Associates,
Bva,
Bva. Inc.,
Olson, Keith,
Sfra,
Wiegel Fried, Llp.,
for CONTRACT/WARRANTY
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
et
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Nov-13-2008 3:46 pm
Case Number: CGC-05-437555
Filing Date: Nov-13-2008 3:46
Juke Box: 001 Image: 02315212
ORDER
Instructions:
JOHN DOE JR VS. BVA et al
001002315212
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.Clifford E. Fried, SBN 118288 77%
John P. Baba, SBN 220870
Wiegel & Fried, LLP San Francisco Lounly ‘Superior Court
414 Gough Street
San Francisco, CA. 94102-4416 NOV 13 2008
Telephone: (415) §52-8230
AK-LI, Clerk
Attomeys for Defendant GGRDON PARK j, Cle?
BAYSIDE VILLAGE ASSOCIATES or y Clerk
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
IN AND FOR THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
UNLIMITED CIVIL JURISDICTION
JOHN DOE (STAN SCHULDINER), N? CGC-05-437555
13 Plaintiff, [PROFOSBD) ORDER
14 ENYING MOTION TO
v. VACATE DISMISSAL
15] BAYSIDE VILLAGE ASSOCIATES , et
16 al.,
"7 Defendants.
Plaintiff STAN SCHULDINER’s (JOHN DOE’s) motion to vacate dismissal came
on regularly for hearing in Department 301 of the San Francisco Superior Court on
November 13, 2008, with the Honorable Peter J. Busch presiding. John P. Baba of Wiegel
& Fried, LLP appeared on behalf of Defendant BVA. STAN SCHULDINER appeared
on his own behalf. Having considered the points and authorities and other documents and
evidence supporting and opposing the motion,
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING MOTION TO VACATE DISMISSAL
N° CGC-05-437555Co wnt A HW e YN |
wR KR KR NY KN KN SF Se Se Se ee Se oe Se Se
outa AA BwBoNH = Do Oo aI DH FY YH | FS
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT STAN SCHULDINER’S (JOHN DOE's) Motion To
Vacate Dismissal IS DENIED. Plaintiff has not shown any grounds that could not have
been presented in opposition to the motion to dismiss. Even if considered, no ground
raised now justifies a different result or reinstating the lawsuit.
DATE: iffis}4a Coke.
JUDGE OF JHE SUPERIOR COURT
‘PETER J. BUSCH
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING MOTION TO VACATE DISMISSAL
N? CGC-05-437555
Document Filed Date
November 13, 2008
Case Filing Date
January 06, 2005
Category
CONTRACT/WARRANTY
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
et SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Nov-13-2008 3:46 pm Case Number: CGC-05-437555 Filing Date: Nov-13-2008 3:46 Juke Box: 001 Image: 02315212 ORDER Instructions: JOHN DOE JR VS. BVA et al 001002315212 Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.Clifford E. Fried, SBN 118288 77% John P. Baba, SBN 220870 Wiegel & Fried, LLP San Francisco Lounly ‘Superior Court 414 Gough Street San Francisco, CA. 94102-4416 NOV 13 2008 Telephone: (415) §52-8230 AK-LI, Clerk Attomeys for Defendant GGRDON PARK j, Cle? BAYSIDE VILLAGE ASSOCIATES or y Clerk IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED CIVIL JURISDICTION JOHN DOE (STAN SCHULDINER), N? CGC-05-437555 13 Plaintiff, [PROFOSBD) ORDER 14 ENYING MOTION TO v. VACATE DISMISSAL 15] BAYSIDE VILLAGE ASSOCIATES , et 16 al., "7 Defendants. Plaintiff STAN SCHULDINER’s (JOHN DOE’s) motion to vacate dismissal came on regularly for hearing in Department 301 of the San Francisco Superior Court on November 13, 2008, with the Honorable Peter J. Busch presiding. John P. Baba of Wiegel & Fried, LLP appeared on behalf of Defendant BVA. STAN SCHULDINER appeared on his own behalf. Having considered the points and authorities and other documents and evidence supporting and opposing the motion, [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING MOTION TO VACATE DISMISSAL N° CGC-05-437555Co wnt A HW e YN | wR KR KR NY KN KN SF Se Se Se ee Se oe Se Se outa AA BwBoNH = Do Oo aI DH FY YH | FS IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT STAN SCHULDINER’S (JOHN DOE's) Motion To Vacate Dismissal IS DENIED. Plaintiff has not shown any grounds that could not have been presented in opposition to the motion to dismiss. Even if considered, no ground raised now justifies a different result or reinstating the lawsuit. DATE: iffis}4a Coke. JUDGE OF JHE SUPERIOR COURT ‘PETER J. BUSCH [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING MOTION TO VACATE DISMISSAL N? CGC-05-437555