arrow left
arrow right
  • FRANK BANDUCCI VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • FRANK BANDUCCI VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • FRANK BANDUCCI VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • FRANK BANDUCCI VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • FRANK BANDUCCI VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • FRANK BANDUCCI VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

MO SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Feb-15-2011 4:36 pm Case Number: CGC-05-446272 Filing Date: Feb-15-2011 2:15 Juke Box: 001 Image: 03125372 JER GRANTING VIACOM INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR DELA' FRANK BANDUCCI VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS 001003125372 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.FRANK D, POND (Bar No. 126191) KEVIN D. JAMISON (Bar No. 222105) kjamison@pondnorth.com MARY KATHERINE BACK (Bar No. 234021) ; mback@pondnorth.com ° POND NORTH LLP FEB 15 2011 350 South Grand Avenue, Suite 3300 Los Angeles, CA 90071 CLERK OF T; ‘ Telephone: (213) 617-6170 By. x © COURT Facsimile: (213) 623-3594 . Deputy Attorneys for Defendant Viacom Inc., successor by merger to CBS Corporation, (f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation) SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO FRANK BANDUCCI Case No: CGC-05-446272 Plaintiff, JPROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING VIACOM INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS vs. FOR DELAY IN PROSECUTION ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P) Judge: Hon. Harold E. Kahn Department: 220 Defendant. Date: February 15, 2011 Time: 9:30 am Case Filed: | November 1, 2005 Viacom Inc.’s (“Viacom”) Motion to Dismiss for delay in prosecution under Code of Civil Procedure sections 583.310 and 583.360 (“Motion”), came on regularly for hearing before this Court in Department 220, Honorable Harold E. Kahn Presiding, on February 15, 2011, Plaintiff did not oppose Viacom’s Motion. Therefore, the Court GRANTED Viacom’s Motion to Dismiss all claims of Plaintiff Frank Banducci against Viacom. MII Mf Mf /Il 1 PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING VIACOM INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR DELAY IN PROSECUTION 4520-1202:627884.1SCS OP YN DH Bw BY YB NY YN YN NN NY Be Be Be Be ew ewe ee ew nL orn yr FF YP NF SSD we A DAA BDH B|Y As such, Viacom is dismissed in this instant action, IT IS SO ORDERED. FEB 15 201 DATED: , 2010 2 JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT HAROLD KAHN [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING VIACOM INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR DELAY IN PROSECUTION 4520-1202:627884.1