arrow left
arrow right
  • SWEET PRODUCTION, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION  vs.  SOLOMON SHA, et al(07) Unlimited Business Tort/Unfair Business Practice document preview
  • SWEET PRODUCTION, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION  vs.  SOLOMON SHA, et al(07) Unlimited Business Tort/Unfair Business Practice document preview
  • SWEET PRODUCTION, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION  vs.  SOLOMON SHA, et al(07) Unlimited Business Tort/Unfair Business Practice document preview
  • SWEET PRODUCTION, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION  vs.  SOLOMON SHA, et al(07) Unlimited Business Tort/Unfair Business Practice document preview
  • SWEET PRODUCTION, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION  vs.  SOLOMON SHA, et al(07) Unlimited Business Tort/Unfair Business Practice document preview
  • SWEET PRODUCTION, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION  vs.  SOLOMON SHA, et al(07) Unlimited Business Tort/Unfair Business Practice document preview
  • SWEET PRODUCTION, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION  vs.  SOLOMON SHA, et al(07) Unlimited Business Tort/Unfair Business Practice document preview
  • SWEET PRODUCTION, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION  vs.  SOLOMON SHA, et al(07) Unlimited Business Tort/Unfair Business Practice document preview
						
                                

Preview

ClV-1 30 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATFORNEY (Name. State Bar number, and address): _ David J. Miclean (SBN 115098) Danielle M. Mihalkanin (SBN 271442) MICLEAN GLEASON LLP I L E1 FMAT???“ EL} SAN rfla 5N?» 411 Bore] Avenue, Suite 310, San Mateo, CA 94402 TELEPHONE FAX N0. NO.: (650‘) 684_1 181 (Optional): DEC 1 7 2019 EMA'LADDRFSS (OP‘W'F dmiclean@micleangleason.com ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Defendant and Cross—Comnlainant Solomon Sha SUPERIOR COURT 0F CALIFORNIA, COUNTY 0F San Mateo STREETADDRESS= 400 County Center MAILING ADDRESS: 18— CIV—03110 CWANDZ'PCODE Redwood City, CA 94063 NOEJ BRANCH NAME: Notice of Entry of Judgmentlorder 217 PLAINIIFF/PEHIIONER: S WCCt P IO d L10t'1011, In C. DEFENDAN l/RESPONDEN | : SOlomOIl Sha illifiimu mun mum "w "— __ ' V CASENUMBER: NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT OR ORDER 18-CIV—03 1 1 0 (Check one): UNLIMITED CASE (Amount demanded E LIMITED CASE (Amount demanded was exceeded $25,000) $25,000 or less) TO ALL PARTIES : 1, Ajudgment, decree, or order was entered in this action on (date): December 13, 2019 2, A copy of the judgment, debree, or order is attached to this notice. Date: December 17, 2019 Danielle M. Mihalkanin (TYPE 0R PRINT NAME 0F AYTORNEY E PARTY WITHOUT ATrORNEY) ’ (SIGNATURE) Page 1 of 2 Form Approved for Optional Use www.wurfinio.ca.ga Judicial Council of CaIifomia NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT OR ORDER ClV—130 [New January 1. 2010] §§E§ @figgamaa ClV-1 30 CASE ”UMBER: PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Sweet Production. Inc. .._ 18-CIV-031 1 0 DEFENDANTIRESPONDENT: Solomon Sha PROOF OF SERVICE BY FIRST-CLASS MAIL NOTICE OF ENTRY 0F JUDGMENT OR ORDER (NOTE: You cannot serve the Notice of Entry of Judgment or Order ifyou are a party in the action. The person who served the notice must complete this proof of service.) 1. I am at least 18 years old and not a party to this action. am a resident of or employed | in the county where the mailing took place, and my residence or business address is (specifix): (Business) 411 Borel Avenue, Suite 310 San Mateo, CA 94402 | sewed a copy of the Notice of Entry ofJudgment or Order by enclosing it in a sealed enve|ope with postage fully prepaid and (check one): a deposited the sealed enve|ope with the United States Postal Service. b_ placed the sealed enve|ope for collection and processing for mailing, following this business's usual practices, with which l am readily familiar. On the same day correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service. . The Notice of Entry of Judgment or Order was mailed: a. on (date),- December17.2019 b. from (city and state): San Mateo, CA The enve|ope was addressed and mailed as follows: a. Name of person served: c. Name of person served: Andrew M. Agtagma (Counsel for Sweet Production. Inc.) Sweet Express Street address: 951 Mariners island Blvd., Suite 300 Street address: 915 Terminal Way City: San Mateo City: San Carlos State and zip code: CA 94404 State and zip code: CA 94070 b. Name of person sewed: d. Name of person served: Ming Chin Doreen Chin Street address: 91 5 Terminal Way Street address: 915 Terminal Way City: 8a” cams City: San Carlos State and zip code: CA 94070 State and zip code: CA 94070 E Names and addresses of additional persons served are attached. (You may use form POS-030(P).) 5. Number of pages attached 2 . l declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Date: December 17, 2019 Douglas D. Collins (TYPE OR PRINT NAME 0F DECLARANT] z (SIGNATURE OF DECLARANT) Page 2 of 2 °‘V4301Newmua’y1-2mo] NOTICE OF ENTRY 0F JUDGMENT OR ORDER DAVID J. MICLEAN (SBN 115098) F E L E g.1} v‘. '1‘.» SAN ”AYES L‘mjfii e ‘ dmiclean@micleangleason.com DANIELLE M. MHALKANIN (SBN 271442) DEC 1 3 2019 dmihalkanin@micléangleason.com IvflCLEAN GLEASON LLP 411 Borel Avenue, Suite 3 10 San Mateo, CA 94402 Telephone: (650) 684-1 1 81 Facsimile: (650) 684-1 182 Attorneys for Defendant and Cross—Complainant Solomon Sha SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10 COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 11 SWEET PRODUCTION, INC., a California Case No. 18-CIV—03 1 10 12‘ Corporation, 13 14 Plaintiff, {W} ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT AND CROSS-CONIPLAINANT V' SOLOMON SHAoS EX PARTE 15 APPLICATION TO CONTINUE THE TRIAL DATE 16 SOLOMON SI-IA, an individual; and DOES 1 to 10, inclusive, 17 Defendants_ Date: December 13, 2019 18 Time: 2:00 pm. Departrhent: Law & Motion 19 20 SOLOMON SHA, 21 Cross—Complainant, 22 V. 23 SWEET PRODUCTION, INC., a California 24 SWEET EXPRESS; MJNG CHIN; corporation; DOREEN CHlN; and ROES 1 through 10, 25 inclusive, 26 Cross—Defendants. 27 28 ORDER ‘ CASE NO. 18—CIV—031 10 ORDER The ex parte application of Defendant and Cross-Complainant Solomon Sha (“Sha”) to Continue the Trial Date came on for hearing on an ex parte basis on December 13, 2019. A The Court, having considered the papers filed in support of the motion, and further having considered the argument at the hearing, and good cause appearing therefor, hereby GRANTS Sha’s ex flak!) parte application. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The tn'al currently set for January 6, 2020, is continued until ~5va ‘é :va Q4" é; 5x 2. A11 statutory deadlines Will be predicate on the new trial datefiA—fl 10 and 11 U) MSC‘S xfl} gvr Jluwé SL‘Z‘Jw Gk \3U ya 12 DEC 1 3 2819, 13 14 15 Dated: , Wsmk Judg J0 f the Superior Court E. KARESH - 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER FAcc'Mn 1 o rwv m1 1n