On June 18, 2018 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Sha, Solomon,
Sweet Production, Inc., A California Corporation,
and
Does 1 To 10, Inclusive,
Sha, Solomon,
for (07) Unlimited Business Tort/Unfair Business Practice
in the District Court of San Mateo County.
Preview
DAVID J. MICLEAN (SBN 115098)
dmiclean@micleangleason.com
DANIELLE M. MIHALKANIN (SBN 271442)
dmihalkanin@micleangleason.com
MICLEAN GLEASON LLP
41 1 Borel Avenue, Suite 3 10
San Mateo, CA 94402 M2 :4 WI)
Telephone: (650) 684—1 181 s; w mflam ms iN‘N
Facsimile: (650) 684-1 182
NON
DE; 0 s 2339
Attorneys for Defendant and Cross-Complainant “
.z‘i’fi' ’
”e "ya:
vim x Ldfi‘ fig; -
Solomon Sha
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
10 COUNTY OF SAN MATEO
11
12
SWEET PRODUCTION, INC, a California Case No. 18-CIV-031 10
Corporation,
13
Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
14 SOLOMON SHA’S SOLOMON SHA’S EX
v.
PARTE MOTION FOR TERMINATING
15 SANCTIONS AND MONETARY
SANCTIONS AGAINST PLAINTIFF SWEET
16
SOLOMON SHA, an individual; and DOES 1 to PRODUCTION, INC.; 0R, FOR AN ORDER
10, inclusive, SHORTENING TIME AND RELIEF FROM
17
CCP 2024.020(a)
Defendants.
18
Date: December 9, 20 1 9
19
Time: 2:00 p.m.
Department: Law & Motion
20 SOLOMON SHA,
21 Cross—Complainant,
22 v.
23 five“!
413““
SWEET PRODUCTION, INC., a California ‘\
D .
24 corporation; SWEET EXPRESS; MING CHIN; oo‘der Denv‘ng
\‘
DOREEN CHIN; and ROES 1 through 10,
25 inclusive, ‘=(\&§ii\\i\\\\\\\\\\\l\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\‘\\=
26 Cross-Defendants.
27
28
ORDER CASE NO. 18-CIV-03 1 10
ORDER
The Motion of Defendant and Cross-Complainant Solomon Sha (“Sha”) for an order granting
his Ex Parte Motion for Terminating Sanctions and Monetary Sanctions Against Plaintiff Sweet.
Production, Inc. (“SP1”); or, for an Order Shortening Time and Relief from CCP 2024.020(a) came on
for hearing on an ex parte basis on December 9, 2019.
The Court, having considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, and
further having considered the argument at the hearing, and good cause appearing therefor, hereby
GRANTS Sha’s Motion for Terminating Sanctions and Monetary Sanctions; or, in the Alternative, its
Order Shortening Time. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
10 1. Terminating sanctions are imposed on SP1 and SPI’s case against Sha is dismissed with
11 prejudice; and
12 2. Monetary sanctions in the amount of $ are imposed on SPI in favor of
13 Sha.
14 0r, in the alternative,
15 1. An order shortening time is granted and Mr. Sha is relieved from CCP 2024.020(a) so
16 that Mr. Sha’s Motion for Terminating Sanctions and Monetary Sanctions will be heard
17 by this Court on at 9:00 a.m., With an Opposition due
18 ,
and a Reply due
19
20
21 IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23 Dated:
Judge of the Superior Court
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER CASE NQ. 18—CIV-03 1 10
Document Filed Date
December 06, 2019
Case Filing Date
June 18, 2018
Category
(07) Unlimited Business Tort/Unfair Business Practice
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
DAVID J. MICLEAN (SBN 115098) dmiclean@micleangleason.com DANIELLE M. MIHALKANIN (SBN 271442) dmihalkanin@micleangleason.com MICLEAN GLEASON LLP 41 1 Borel Avenue, Suite 3 10 San Mateo, CA 94402 M2 :4 WI) Telephone: (650) 684—1 181 s; w mflam ms iN‘N Facsimile: (650) 684-1 182 NON DE; 0 s 2339 Attorneys for Defendant and Cross-Complainant “ .z‘i’fi' ’ ”e "ya: vim x Ldfi‘ fig; - Solomon Sha SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10 COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 11 12 SWEET PRODUCTION, INC, a California Case No. 18-CIV-031 10 Corporation, 13 Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 14 SOLOMON SHA’S SOLOMON SHA’S EX v. PARTE MOTION FOR TERMINATING 15 SANCTIONS AND MONETARY SANCTIONS AGAINST PLAINTIFF SWEET 16 SOLOMON SHA, an individual; and DOES 1 to PRODUCTION, INC.; 0R, FOR AN ORDER 10, inclusive, SHORTENING TIME AND RELIEF FROM 17 CCP 2024.020(a) Defendants. 18 Date: December 9, 20 1 9 19 Time: 2:00 p.m. Department: Law & Motion 20 SOLOMON SHA, 21 Cross—Complainant, 22 v. 23 five“! 413““ SWEET PRODUCTION, INC., a California ‘\ D . 24 corporation; SWEET EXPRESS; MING CHIN; oo‘der Denv‘ng \‘ DOREEN CHIN; and ROES 1 through 10, 25 inclusive, ‘=(\&§ii\\i\\\\\\\\\\\l\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\‘\\= 26 Cross-Defendants. 27 28 ORDER CASE NO. 18-CIV-03 1 10 ORDER The Motion of Defendant and Cross-Complainant Solomon Sha (“Sha”) for an order granting his Ex Parte Motion for Terminating Sanctions and Monetary Sanctions Against Plaintiff Sweet. Production, Inc. (“SP1”); or, for an Order Shortening Time and Relief from CCP 2024.020(a) came on for hearing on an ex parte basis on December 9, 2019. The Court, having considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, and further having considered the argument at the hearing, and good cause appearing therefor, hereby GRANTS Sha’s Motion for Terminating Sanctions and Monetary Sanctions; or, in the Alternative, its Order Shortening Time. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 10 1. Terminating sanctions are imposed on SP1 and SPI’s case against Sha is dismissed with 11 prejudice; and 12 2. Monetary sanctions in the amount of $ are imposed on SPI in favor of 13 Sha. 14 0r, in the alternative, 15 1. An order shortening time is granted and Mr. Sha is relieved from CCP 2024.020(a) so 16 that Mr. Sha’s Motion for Terminating Sanctions and Monetary Sanctions will be heard 17 by this Court on at 9:00 a.m., With an Opposition due 18 , and a Reply due 19 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 Dated: Judge of the Superior Court 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER CASE NQ. 18—CIV-03 1 10