On June 18, 2018 a
Stipulation,Agreement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Sha, Solomon,
Sweet Production, Inc., A California Corporation,
and
Does 1 To 10, Inclusive,
Sha, Solomon,
for (07) Unlimited Business Tort/Unfair Business Practice
in the District Court of San Mateo County.
Preview
. 3 MAL
Atmrney or Party without
membefihip number);
Statc'Bar
Attorney (Name, Address; quepho’nc, Fax, Court Use I ATEO cw
Andrew M. Agtagma (Bar NO. 180703) (650) 372-2600
LAW CENTER (650) 372-9318 (fax)
1291 E. Hillsdale Blvd., Suite 21 1B, Foster
City,CA 94404
SUPERIOR COURT OFTCALIFORNIALCOUNTY OFSAN- MATEO
Hall cf Justice and Recoi'ds
400 County Cen'te:
_
Redwoofi Ciw. CA 94063-1655 (650)261-5 l00 ,
Plaintiffls): Qase numbgrz
Sweet ProduCfion, inc;
t
~18—ClV-031 1‘0
Defendant(s):, Current CMC Date:
Solomon Sha October 18',201 8
snPULATIONAND ORDER T0 APPROPRIATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
withthe Clerk’s Office 10, days prior t'o or 3 weeks following the first
Plaintiff will file this stipulation
Cage Management Conference un1¢5$ directed otherwise by the Court'zmd ADR Directog [Local Rule
2.3(i)(3)3.Please‘attac‘h a,Scrvicc List.
A8
The panics hereby Stipulate.that‘illlciaims in this action shall be submitted to (safest (ma):
GVOIuntary‘Mcdik‘ation .Binding Arbitration (private)
‘ Neutral Evaluation ‘ Settlement-Co'nference (fimta) XV:|
C NoneBinding Judicial Arbitration CCP'1141.12 . Summary Iury Trial Ihe‘f:
I
V
Case Type: 'CiViMijeaCh Of Fiduciégy Dutyyetc.)
Ricard M‘ Wimams’- 6506654343 2/28/19
Nehtral’s name and telephohg number: Date 'of session:
CMC excepf' for non-‘bindingjpdicial‘ arbitration)
(Required for continuance of
by name the
Identify
Sweet Production,
ADR session:
parties to attend
ln‘c.; Solomon Sha .
m
frigin‘aIS' natures.
T
DaVid J.-Mic!e‘an
e or print name of UPany whhoux at‘tomcy .Mtqm'c‘y
‘
f’or
againfiffmcfitioncr.DcfcndandRcspondc’mICpniemnk
(r
’
Mwmcy
»
.
(Signature)
Party without auornc
Andrew M. Agtagma ‘
ADR
T p: or print 1mm: 6f DK’any‘ without altqmcylmmmcx for y _ .
(Sigma: to
‘PlaimiffiPctilionch DcfcndamchspondcritIContcstam Anor'ncy 6r Patty fivithoui‘énom
‘
llll1|l{IIIIHIIHIIIIIWIIIII|\|
Order
‘
a and
, a
Tvpc or prim namcpf'Dszy wilkdut auomcyDAgtcmey‘for (Signature) cl
DPlainfiffchtilioncrDcfcn‘danURcspéndcm/Cémcétam momey
Attorney or Party without
E Stipulation
1504569
ISOADR
‘
$3
gt or prim name :I
UM); without attomcyflmmmey for
o‘f
_
(Signamrc)
Vlnimiffchtidon¢rflDé£end3nglprqndcnz/Comesitam Attorney or Pany'xvithom agtomey
IT IS SO ORDERED:
éKzfg‘
Dam; 321-92018 judge of‘the'SuEJCfior Cour't'of San Mateo County
um,
FormAoacvq (Rev. Feb. 20143
Q h
m
E D2 0
N O
%
_ U5 .
m .
3 m2
O0
E
> = .
w 3
. m
m >
_
m ao
m
¢
PROOF OF SERVICE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO
I am employed in the County of San Mateo, State of California. I am over the a e of
18 and not a party t0 the within action; my business address is: 1291 E Hillsdale Blvd, uite
21 1B, Foster City, California 94404.
©m\1®01vlk03[0)—t
On November 8, 2018, I served the foregoing
document(s) described as:
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO APPROPRIATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
on interested parties in this action by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in sealed envelopes
as follows:
David Miclean, Es .
MICLEAN GLEA ON LLP
411 Borel Ave., Suite 310
San Mateo, CA 94402
2113
l BY MAIL (0.0.13. §1013{a)) I am readily familiar with the firm’s practice of collection and
processing correspondence for mailing with the U.S. Postal Service. Under that practice it
94404
would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day with Elostage thereon fully
Suite
prefaid at Foster City, California in the ordinary course of business. T e envelope was sealed
placed for collection and mailing on that date following ordinary business practices.
Corporation
an
Blvd.,
BY EXPRESS MAIL (0.0.11. § 1013(4) I am readily familiar with the firm’s practice of
California
__
CENTER
collection and Frocessing correspondence for mailing with Federal Express. Under that
practice it; wou d be deposited with Federal Express on that same dafr thereon fully pre aid at
City,
Hillsdale
LAW
Professional
Foster City, California in the ordinary course of business. The enve ope was sealed an
placed for collection and mailing on that date following ordinary business practices.
wwwmwr—‘t—IHHHHr—Ar—Ir—tp—a
E.
_
.Foster
A BY PERSONAL SERVICE Idelivered such envelope(s) by
(0.0.13. 1011(3)) hand to the offices of
1291
the addressee(s).
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
mwgavkwwHocomuOSMermr—lo
above is true and correct.
Executed on November 8, 2018 at Foster City, California.
Teanny I. Pai
Name of Person Executing Proof]
[Print [Signature]
[OM
Stipulationand Order toAppropriate Dispute Resolution
Document Filed Date
November 20, 2018
Case Filing Date
June 18, 2018
Category
(07) Unlimited Business Tort/Unfair Business Practice
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.