arrow left
arrow right
  • SWEET PRODUCTION, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION  vs.  SOLOMON SHA, et al(07) Unlimited Business Tort/Unfair Business Practice document preview
  • SWEET PRODUCTION, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION  vs.  SOLOMON SHA, et al(07) Unlimited Business Tort/Unfair Business Practice document preview
  • SWEET PRODUCTION, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION  vs.  SOLOMON SHA, et al(07) Unlimited Business Tort/Unfair Business Practice document preview
  • SWEET PRODUCTION, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION  vs.  SOLOMON SHA, et al(07) Unlimited Business Tort/Unfair Business Practice document preview
  • SWEET PRODUCTION, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION  vs.  SOLOMON SHA, et al(07) Unlimited Business Tort/Unfair Business Practice document preview
  • SWEET PRODUCTION, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION  vs.  SOLOMON SHA, et al(07) Unlimited Business Tort/Unfair Business Practice document preview
						
                                

Preview

. 3 MAL Atmrney or Party without membefihip number); Statc'Bar Attorney (Name, Address; quepho’nc, Fax, Court Use I ATEO cw Andrew M. Agtagma (Bar NO. 180703) (650) 372-2600 LAW CENTER (650) 372-9318 (fax) 1291 E. Hillsdale Blvd., Suite 21 1B, Foster City,CA 94404 SUPERIOR COURT OFTCALIFORNIALCOUNTY OFSAN- MATEO Hall cf Justice and Recoi'ds 400 County Cen'te: _ Redwoofi Ciw. CA 94063-1655 (650)261-5 l00 , Plaintiffls): Qase numbgrz Sweet ProduCfion, inc; t ~18—ClV-031 1‘0 Defendant(s):, Current CMC Date: Solomon Sha October 18',201 8 snPULATIONAND ORDER T0 APPROPRIATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION withthe Clerk’s Office 10, days prior t'o or 3 weeks following the first Plaintiff will file this stipulation Cage Management Conference un1¢5$ directed otherwise by the Court'zmd ADR Directog [Local Rule 2.3(i)(3)3.Please‘attac‘h a,Scrvicc List. A8 The panics hereby Stipulate.that‘illlciaims in this action shall be submitted to (safest (ma): GVOIuntary‘Mcdik‘ation .Binding Arbitration (private) ‘ Neutral Evaluation ‘ Settlement-Co'nference (fimta) XV:| C NoneBinding Judicial Arbitration CCP'1141.12 . Summary Iury Trial Ihe‘f: I V Case Type: 'CiViMijeaCh Of Fiduciégy Dutyyetc.) Ricard M‘ Wimams’- 6506654343 2/28/19 Nehtral’s name and telephohg number: Date 'of session: CMC excepf' for non-‘bindingjpdicial‘ arbitration) (Required for continuance of by name the Identify Sweet Production, ADR session: parties to attend ln‘c.; Solomon Sha . m frigin‘aIS' natures. T DaVid J.-Mic!e‘an e or print name of UPany whhoux at‘tomcy .Mtqm'c‘y ‘ f’or againfiffmcfitioncr.DcfcndandRcspondc’mICpniemnk (r ’ Mwmcy » . (Signature) Party without auornc Andrew M. Agtagma ‘ ADR T p: or print 1mm: 6f DK’any‘ without altqmcylmmmcx for y _ . (Sigma: to ‘PlaimiffiPctilionch DcfcndamchspondcritIContcstam Anor'ncy 6r Patty fivithoui‘énom ‘ llll1|l{IIIIHIIHIIIIIWIIIII|\| Order ‘ a and , a Tvpc or prim namcpf'Dszy wilkdut auomcyDAgtcmey‘for (Signature) cl DPlainfiffchtilioncrDcfcn‘danURcspéndcm/Cémcétam momey Attorney or Party without E Stipulation 1504569 ISOADR ‘ $3 gt or prim name :I UM); without attomcyflmmmey for o‘f _ (Signamrc) Vlnimiffchtidon¢rflDé£end3nglprqndcnz/Comesitam Attorney or Pany'xvithom agtomey IT IS SO ORDERED: éKzfg‘ Dam; 321-92018 judge of‘the'SuEJCfior Cour't'of San Mateo County um, FormAoacvq (Rev. Feb. 20143 Q h m E D2 0 N O % _ U5 . m . 3 m2 O0 E > = . w 3 . m m > _ m ao m ¢ PROOF OF SERVICE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO I am employed in the County of San Mateo, State of California. I am over the a e of 18 and not a party t0 the within action; my business address is: 1291 E Hillsdale Blvd, uite 21 1B, Foster City, California 94404. ©m\1®01vlk03[0)—t On November 8, 2018, I served the foregoing document(s) described as: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO APPROPRIATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION on interested parties in this action by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in sealed envelopes as follows: David Miclean, Es . MICLEAN GLEA ON LLP 411 Borel Ave., Suite 310 San Mateo, CA 94402 2113 l BY MAIL (0.0.13. §1013{a)) I am readily familiar with the firm’s practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing with the U.S. Postal Service. Under that practice it 94404 would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day with Elostage thereon fully Suite prefaid at Foster City, California in the ordinary course of business. T e envelope was sealed placed for collection and mailing on that date following ordinary business practices. Corporation an Blvd., BY EXPRESS MAIL (0.0.11. § 1013(4) I am readily familiar with the firm’s practice of California __ CENTER collection and Frocessing correspondence for mailing with Federal Express. Under that practice it; wou d be deposited with Federal Express on that same dafr thereon fully pre aid at City, Hillsdale LAW Professional Foster City, California in the ordinary course of business. The enve ope was sealed an placed for collection and mailing on that date following ordinary business practices. wwwmwr—‘t—IHHHHr—Ar—Ir—tp—a E. _ .Foster A BY PERSONAL SERVICE Idelivered such envelope(s) by (0.0.13. 1011(3)) hand to the offices of 1291 the addressee(s). I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the mwgavkwwHocomuOSMermr—lo above is true and correct. Executed on November 8, 2018 at Foster City, California. Teanny I. Pai Name of Person Executing Proof] [Print [Signature] [OM Stipulationand Order toAppropriate Dispute Resolution