Judgment: ERNEST EGAN VS BANK OF AMERICA ETQAL

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                4-"s~.';i
       C




       r                                       SUPERIOR        COURT OF THK STATE OF                CALIFORNIA
       r ---.
                                                                 COUNTY OF         SAN MATEO
                 10

                 11     GIOCONDA-MARIAEGAN                                           Case  No   CIV524117
                                                                                     Assigned   to the I-Ionorable  Steven   L. Dyhna
                 12                      Plaintiffs,
                                                                                     [PROPOSED]        JUDGMENT OF           COSTS
                 13     v.

                 14     BANK OF AMERICA, N.A,               BAC HOME                SAC Filed.       July 7, 2014
                        LOANS SERVICING, LP             fka COUNTRYWIDE             FAC Filed:       Febiwary   18, 2014
                 15     HOlvlE LOANS SERVICING, LP; MORTGAGE                        Trial Date      None
                        FLECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS,
                 16     INC, RECONTRUST            COMPANY, N A., AND
                        DOES     1-10, INCLUSIVF.,

                 18                      Defendants.

                 19

                                On   September    25,  2014,   the Court   sustained   defendants   Bank    of Amenca,     NA     (BANA),
                       BAC Home       I.oans  Servicing,  LP,  Ika Countrywide     Home    Loans   Servicing,  LP  (BAC Home'Loans),
                 22    Mortgage     Electronic    Registration     Systems,    Inc   (MKRS),      and   Recon Trust 'ompany,         N.A.'s
                                                                                                                    I


                        (ReconTrust),      (collectively,   defendants)     demurrer    to  plaintiff  Gioconda-Maria       Egan's   second

                       amended    complaint   without leave    to amend      Defendants    filed a memorandum      of costs  on November
                 25     6, 2014    Pursuant   to CRC       3 1700(b),   the time  allowed   for plamtiff to   file and  serve  a  motion   to
                 26     strike or to tax costs  has expired.

                 27

                 28

                        (30124092,1
                                  1
                                                                                  1                                        CAsr. No CIV524117
                                                              [PROPOSED]     JUDGMENT OF COSTS
                                                                                                                               s  Ã
                                                                                                                   7C'
                                                                                                                             ~pl



                                                                                                                              5a



                                                                                                                               C


                                                                                                                           I
                  1              Therefore,   IT IS   ORDERED        that plaintiff shall  take nothing   by  this action,  and  defendants

                  2    BANA, BAC llome Loans,           MERS    and  ReconTrust    shall  recover  from plaintiffthe    costs of suit in the
                  3     sum  of $ 1,800  00 as  approved   by the  Cgot pursuant     to the