arrow left
arrow right
  • CHARLES BOUDREAUX et al VS. ADVOCATE MINES, LTD et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • CHARLES BOUDREAUX et al VS. ADVOCATE MINES, LTD et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • CHARLES BOUDREAUX et al VS. ADVOCATE MINES, LTD et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • CHARLES BOUDREAUX et al VS. ADVOCATE MINES, LTD et al ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY TELEPHONE NO. FOR GOURT USE ONLY (Name and Address): 214-621-8605 Carolin Shining, Esq. (SBN 201140) John Langeoe, Esq. (SBN 235509) ELECTRONICALLY BARON & BUDD,P.C, 3102 Oak Lawn Avenue, Suite 1100 FILE Dallas, Texas 75219 ‘Superior Court of Cdiforna, County of San Frahcisco arroRwry 0 om: Plants Tmt eo a nd ml ROAR TF AUG 14 2007 ‘Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco GORDON PARK-LI, Clerk TANTERPETTTONER BY: ANNIE PASCUAL CHARLES BOUDREAUX and DEBORAH Deputy Cierk BOUDREAUX GEFENDANTRESPONDENT: ADVOCATE MINES, LTD., et al REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL CASE mT 2 Personal injury, Property Damage, o* Wrongful Death ‘CGC-07-274029 OMotervehicle 3 Other O Famtly Low ‘DEminant Domain U other (specity} = Accanformed copy will not be returned by the clerk unless a method of return Is provided with the document. — + TO THE CLERK: Please dismiss this action as follows: a. (1) Wah prejudice (2) & Without prejudice b. (1) 3 Complaint (2) Petition (3) 2 Cross-complaint fled by (name) (4) 5 Cross-complaint fled by (name): (5) 3 Entire action of al parties and all causes of action (5) 3 Other (specify}:* Defendant Sepco Corporation only, with “ of costs Date: 632007 Caroin k. Shining ome oR PRT Ua OF ATIORNEY PART WITHOUT ATORNEN onan Te ‘aust sequsad hot specs ptin ny. aed Altorney or party without attorney for: Sait fsa sty apetiod ventana a wane ae ety pats, casne cf ace of cose cos tee Bl PlaintiPettioner 0 DefendartRespondont Cross-complainant 2 TO THE CLERK: Consent to the above dismissal is hereby given.*> ate: "Ra Naar FC) ATVORNEY EPA WITHOUT ATTORNEY) (SIGNATURE) iE IRPBe, Pamenin amy Lays Attomey or party without attorney for: Sonnac? (Fesponden mus! spo tee consent i teed by Plaintifietiioner 7 DefendantRaspondent ‘eee a Prope secon Set 2 Uh 0 Cross-complainant (70.b0 completed fy oer) 3.7 Dismussal entered as recuested on (celej: 4 10 Dismissal entered on (date): as fo only (nara): 5 5 Dismiss! not entered as requested for the following reasons (specify): 6 (7 a. Atomey or party without attomey notified on (ate): b Attomey or party without attomey not notified, Filing party failed to provide 9 acopy to conform — 2 means to return conformed copy Date Clerk, by. Deputy Thao REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL ‘ase font ropes, § 56 tor, 2s Gress ‘er ean Ct tas 208 12 SANDYS armen AL smoesnLegieie escocrsmncenwa ue wn Selman Breitman LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 28 rau. sesz36s2 PROOF OF SERVICE BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION Boudreaux v. Advocate Mines, Lid.. et al. San Francisco Superior Court Case No. 274029 Defendant: SEPCO CORPORATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Tam employed in the County of San Francisco, State of California. I am over the age of 18 years and am not a party to the within action. My business address is 33 New Montgomery, Sixth Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105. On August 13, 2007, I electronically served the document(s) via Lexis Nexis File & Serve described as 1, REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL on the recipients designated on the Transaction Receipt located on the Lexis Nexis Fite & Serve website. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Exccuted on August 13, 2007, at San Francisco, LIZA H. CACHERO