arrow left
arrow right
  • Ruggirello, Shae Thomas vs California Department of Motor Vehiclescivil document preview
  • Ruggirello, Shae Thomas vs California Department of Motor Vehiclescivil document preview
  • Ruggirello, Shae Thomas vs California Department of Motor Vehiclescivil document preview
  • Ruggirello, Shae Thomas vs California Department of Motor Vehiclescivil document preview
						
                                

Preview

- . THE LAW OFFICE OF MATTHEW C. BENTLY ' i . ' 4/5/2019 Matthew C. Bently, Attorneyat Law SBN 288352 PostOffice Box 8012 Chico, California 95927 Office (530) 592-0676 Fax (530) 433-5402 ' F ‘ WM , County ot Butte _ P \ ‘- L APRHIZIHH E E Attorney for Shae Thomas OD Ruggirello \OOOQOLIIA'MNH ‘ D Petitioner By SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF BUTTE Shae Thomas OD Ruggirello, Case No.118CV03613 ' Petitioner, . . STIPULATION FOR vs. CONTINUANCE AND ORDER GRANTING CONTINUANCE Director of the California Department of - Motor Vehicles, HHHHHHHHHH Respondent. TO THE BUTTE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT: Please take notice that the Petitioner, Shae ‘SgfigfifiiBEBgemoawawwt-ro Thomas Od Ruggirello, hereby requests, and the parties stipulate to, a request for continuance due Petitioner’s Attorney ‘s daughter suffering a medical trauma t0 her arm, and therefore ' Petitioner does not have adequate time review and reply the documents received from and filed by Respondent, and does not have adequate time to review the certified copy of the DMV Administrative Per Se hearing record. BACKGROUND , 1. On' 11/1/2018, Petitioner filed his Verified Petition for an Alternative Writ of ~Mandate to ' Set Aside the Suspension of this Driving Privilege. 2. On 12/21/2018, the parties appeared, and the hearing was continued until April 10, 2019. Ruggirello v. DMV 18CV03613 — Stipulation and Order for Continuance Page 1of 2 3. On Monday, ‘ April ' . 1,_2019, after multiple attempts to obtain the certified record of the DMV hearing in thismatter, Petitioner received it. 4_. On March27,2019, Petitioner received electronic copies .of Respondent’s objection, to the writ, notice of filing of exhibits, and respondent’s object to-the request for judicial i notice. ‘~006\!0\‘U1-bb-1M>-a 'On Monday, April 5. l, 2019, Petitioner’s Attorney’s daughter suffered a traumatic arm injury, and Petitioner’s Attorney hasnot had adequate time to review all of the recently received documents and appropriately respond. 6. Therefore, with the Court’s. permission, the parties hereby stipulate to a continuance of the hearing date with all current orders remaining in full forcie and effect. The parties proposeMay 10, 2019 as the new hearing date. 7. If the Court is not available to hear this matter 30 daysfrom the current hearing date, counsel for the parties are also availabl'e'for hearing: May 9 after 12:00 p.m., May 20-22, May 23 after 12:00 p.m., May 24 and May 28-31, and request that if the Coru't’s calendar Nb-‘t-JHHHP-lb-Kl-AH permits,'that the hearing be scheduled on one of these days. IT IS SO STIPULATED: Dated; 4/5/2019 m6 Matthew'C. 302i? Bently, Attorney for Petitioner [\J .Q4 MQ (ZQQ Mafiew Krista Dunzwtej, AttorneYWRes'pondent ORDER: Based upon the forgoing facts and stipulation, the Court hereby orders this matter ‘M coutinued until Win/V} ,0, WM M ADD [/VVI/L Dated: //’ 9 // 9 Judge wé %/// of the Superior Court " F“ ©LU$ iriAN Ruggirello v. DMV 18CV03613 —- Stipulation and Order for Continuance~ Page 2 of 2