On July 05, 2007 a
Answer
was filed
involving a dispute between
Midland Credit Management Inc,
and
Does 1 To 5 Inclusive,
Taylor, Mary,
for COMMON COUNTS/OPEN BOOK ACCOUNT/COLLECTIONS
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
IVANOVA
‘San Francisco Superior Courts
Information Technology Group
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Sep-12-2007 10:03 am
Case Number: CGC-07-464897
Filing Date: Sep-12-2007 9:59
Juke Box: 001 Image: 01882780
ANSWER
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT INC VS. MARY TAYLOR et al
001001882780
Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.Mary Taylor 0
200 Warten Drive Y)
San Francisco, Ca 94131
"| 415-665-5940 F I L E b
In Pro Per Sen Francisco County Superiof Coun
igep 12 2007
GORDGNPARKCL, Clerk cy
Deputy cle
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
LIMITED CIVIL DIVISION
MARY TAYLOR , an individual; DOES 1
through 10, inclusive,
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, )
) CASE NO. CGC 07-464897
)
) ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
Plaintiff, )
)
v. )
)
)
)
)
Defendant.
Defendant MARY TAYLOR answers plaintiff's complaint as follows:
Defendant denies each and every, all and singular, generally and specifically, the allegations
contained in the Complaint, and each and every part thereof. Defendant further denies that Plaintiff
has been damaged in the sums alleged, or in any sum or sums whatsoever.
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
Plaintiffs actions are barred by the applicable statute of limitations including, but not limited
to, California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 337, 338, 339, 340, and 342 and California Civil
Code Section 1783.
Ml
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1-27
28
4
WHEREFORE, defendant, MARY TAYLOR , prays that Plaintiff take nothing by this
complaint, that Defendant be awarded her costs of suit, including reasonable attomey’s fees; and for
such other and further relief as the Court may deem proper.
Dated: 9-11-2007
—_
By:
MARWTAYLOR
Acting In Pro Per
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 2-“doo! Warred Drive .
San Fraacisco, CA T4463!
ATTOANEYED FoR,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY oF 24w Franciscn
PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL
—CCP 1013a, 2015.5
tdetrene: Sames L. Ubhee
Fam (2 resident offemployed inl the county of Ste Francisco California.
waere mowing eccmsres}
. man She. Wanciscey CA
Law Offices of Pactennude & Folin APL.
Raymond A. Patevaude, 56 #28955;
. ) (efor Ss. Pit enarde, #y
L545 Morphy. Ceayor Rd, 3H Floor , Saw Diego, C4 qe gf
Idectare under penstey of pecjury Mat the foregoing is wue end correct, aad that thit dectorstion was executed on
2007 « wt Franeséo i ct, Cotitornis.
(Oovey : wieced 7
_Damest. Mibhre. E
. rere §
Ty 90 e+ erie Home)
Fing7a
Document Filed Date
September 12, 2007
Case Filing Date
July 05, 2007
Category
COMMON COUNTS/OPEN BOOK ACCOUNT/COLLECTIONS
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
IVANOVA ‘San Francisco Superior Courts Information Technology Group Document Scanning Lead Sheet Sep-12-2007 10:03 am Case Number: CGC-07-464897 Filing Date: Sep-12-2007 9:59 Juke Box: 001 Image: 01882780 ANSWER MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT INC VS. MARY TAYLOR et al 001001882780 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.Mary Taylor 0 200 Warten Drive Y) San Francisco, Ca 94131 "| 415-665-5940 F I L E b In Pro Per Sen Francisco County Superiof Coun igep 12 2007 GORDGNPARKCL, Clerk cy Deputy cle SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO LIMITED CIVIL DIVISION MARY TAYLOR , an individual; DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, ) ) CASE NO. CGC 07-464897 ) ) ANSWER TO COMPLAINT Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ) ) ) Defendant. Defendant MARY TAYLOR answers plaintiff's complaint as follows: Defendant denies each and every, all and singular, generally and specifically, the allegations contained in the Complaint, and each and every part thereof. Defendant further denies that Plaintiff has been damaged in the sums alleged, or in any sum or sums whatsoever. AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE Plaintiffs actions are barred by the applicable statute of limitations including, but not limited to, California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 337, 338, 339, 340, and 342 and California Civil Code Section 1783. Ml ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1-27 28 4 WHEREFORE, defendant, MARY TAYLOR , prays that Plaintiff take nothing by this complaint, that Defendant be awarded her costs of suit, including reasonable attomey’s fees; and for such other and further relief as the Court may deem proper. Dated: 9-11-2007 —_ By: MARWTAYLOR Acting In Pro Per ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 2-“doo! Warred Drive . San Fraacisco, CA T4463! ATTOANEYED FoR, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY oF 24w Franciscn PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL —CCP 1013a, 2015.5 tdetrene: Sames L. Ubhee Fam (2 resident offemployed inl the county of Ste Francisco California. waere mowing eccmsres} . man She. Wanciscey CA Law Offices of Pactennude & Folin APL. Raymond A. Patevaude, 56 #28955; . ) (efor Ss. Pit enarde, #y L545 Morphy. Ceayor Rd, 3H Floor , Saw Diego, C4 qe gf Idectare under penstey of pecjury Mat the foregoing is wue end correct, aad that thit dectorstion was executed on 2007 « wt Franeséo i ct, Cotitornis. (Oovey : wieced 7 _Damest. Mibhre. E . rere § Ty 90 e+ erie Home) Fing7a