arrow left
arrow right
  • RUFUS ALEXANDER VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • RUFUS ALEXANDER VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • RUFUS ALEXANDER VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • RUFUS ALEXANDER VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • RUFUS ALEXANDER VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • RUFUS ALEXANDER VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

Dean Pollack, State Bar No. 176440 Walter C. Rundin, State Bar No. 072475 Bina Ghanaat, State Bar No. 264826 ELECTRONICALLY BURNHAM BROWN FILED A Professional Law Corporation . oe P.O. Box 119 Superior Court of California, Oakland, California 94604 County of San Francisco _ MAR 02 2011 1901 Harrison Street, 14th Floor Clerk of the Court Oakland, California 94612 BY: ANNIE PASCUAL Telephone: (510) 444-6800 Deputy Clerk Facsimile: (510) 835-6666 Attorneys for Defendant BORG-WARNER CORPORATION by its successor-in-interest Borg Warner Morse TEC Inc. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION RUFUS ALEXANDER No. CGC-08-274719 Plaintiff, DEFENDANT BORG-WARNER CORPORATION BY ITS SUCCESSOR v. IN INTEREST BORGWARNER MORSE TEC INC.’S NOTICE OF ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BP), as NON-OPPOSITION IN LIEU OF Reflected on Exhibits B, C, G, H, I; and REPLY DOES 1-8500, Date: March 9, 2011 Defendants. Time: 1:30 p.m. Judge: Hon. Harold E. Kahn Dept.: 220 Complaint Filed: uly 1, 2008 Trial Date: Not Set TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that as of March 1, 2011, Defendant BORG-WARNER CORPORATION BY ITS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST BORGWARNER MORSE TEC INC. (Borg-Wamer Corporation”) has not received any oppositions to its (1) Motion to Compel Plaintiff's Responses to Borg-Warner Corporation’s Third Set of Request for Production of Documents and Request for Award of Monetary and Terminating Sanctions; and (2) Motion to Compel Plaintiff's Responses to Borg-Warner Corporation’s Third Set of Special Interrogatories and Request for Award of Monetary and Terminating Sanctions. Any oppositions to these 1 DEF. BORG-WARNER CORP. BY JTS SI] BORG WARNER MORSE TEC INC’S NO. CGC-08-274719 NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION IN LIEU OF REPLY .motions, which are both set to be heard on March 9, 2011, were required to have been filed and served by February 24, 2011. Plaintiff has not only failed to file any opposition to these motions as of March 1, 2011, but he also failed to file any opposition to these motions prior to their original hearing date of November 18, 2010. Plaintiff also failed to file any opposition prior to the continued hearing dates of December 8, 2010, and February 23, 2011. DATED: March 2, 2011 BURNHAM BROWN By Brow Prranank BINA GHANAAT Attorneys for Defendant BORG-WARNER CORPORATION by its guccessor-in-interest BorgWarner Morse TEC Inc. 2 DEF. BORG- WARNER CORP, BY ITS SIT BORGWARNER MORSE TEC INC.’S. NO. CGC-08-274719 NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION IN LIEU OF REPLYRe: Rufus Alexander v. Asbesto Defendants, et al. Court: San Francisco County Superior Court, Unlimited Jurisdiction Action No: CGC-08-274719 PROOF OF SERVICE I declare that 1 am over the age of 18, not a party to the above-entitled action, and am an employee of Burnham Brown whose business address is 1901 Harrison Street, 14" Floor, Oakland, Alameda County, California 94612 (mailing address: Post Office Box 119, Oakland, California 94604). On March 2, 2011, I served the following document(s) in the following manner(s): DEFENDANT BORG-WARNER CORPORATION BY ITS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST BORGWARNER MORSE TEC INC.'S NOTICE OF NON- OPPOSITION IN LIEU OF REPLY MAIL: By placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed envelope with postage thereon on the date and place shown below following ordinary business practice. I am familiar with this business’ practice for collecting and processing documents for mailing. On the same day that documents are placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid as follows: Rufus Alexander 170 Cashmere Street, Apartment D San Francisco, CA 94124 J LEXISNEXIS FILE & SERVE: By electronically transmitting the document(s) listed above to LexisNexis File & Serve, an electronic filing service provider, at www.LexisNexis.com, pursuant to the Court’s Order dated October 19, 2004, Mandating Electronic Service. See California Rules of Court 1830 and 2053(a). The transmission was reported as complete and without error. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. DATE: M: 2.2011 Lad Y LAS Annette Di Giovanni 876989 PROOF OF SERVICE CASE NO, CGC-08-274719