On November 10, 2010 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Brimer, Russell,
and
Does 1-150, Inclusive,
Fpc Corporation,
for civil
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
IK AROLTA EL
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Jul-19-2011 9:46 am
Case Number: CGC-10-505320
Filing Date: Jul-19-2011 9:46
Juke Box: 001 Image: 03273084
ORDER
RUSSELL BRIMER VS. FPC CORPORATION et al
001003273084
Instructions: |
Please place this' sheet on top of the document to be scanned.Clifford A.
Hhnler, State Bar No. 135534 .
Brian C. Johngon, State Bar No. 235965 I ! E pH
uperior Court
Berkeley, CA}94710-2565
4 -888 CLER
: Gio) ears BY: LEAK a TRE COupy
Attomeys for biaintift Ooputy Cae
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
UNLIMITED CIVIL JURISDICTION
RUSSELL BRIMER, Case No. CGC-10-505320
Plaintiff,
] ORDER APPROVING
v. PROPOSITION 65 SETTLEMENT
AND CONSENT JUDGMENT
FPC CORPGRATION; and DOES 1-150, Date: April 11, 2011
inclusive, Time: 9:30 a.m.
i Dept: 301
Defendants. Judge: Peter Busch
Action Filed: November 10, 2010co Oo ND WA BR WN Se
See Be Re em Se
Aw PB Ww HY | S
Dated:
jhe parties and attached to the Judgment as Exhibit 1. After consideration of the papers
i the arguments presented, the Court finds that the terms of the settlement set forth in the
Jment meets the criteria established by California Heaith & Safety Code section 25249.7,
based on the criteria set forth in Health & Safety Code § 25249.7(b)(2), any civil
| penalty required by the consent judgment Consent Judgment is reasonable.
LORETTA M. GIORGI
iRDER APPROVING PROPOSITION 65 SETTLEMENT AND CONSENT JUDGMENT
Document Filed Date
July 19, 2011
Case Filing Date
November 10, 2010
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
IK AROLTA EL SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Jul-19-2011 9:46 am Case Number: CGC-10-505320 Filing Date: Jul-19-2011 9:46 Juke Box: 001 Image: 03273084 ORDER RUSSELL BRIMER VS. FPC CORPORATION et al 001003273084 Instructions: | Please place this' sheet on top of the document to be scanned.Clifford A. Hhnler, State Bar No. 135534 . Brian C. Johngon, State Bar No. 235965 I ! E pH uperior Court Berkeley, CA}94710-2565 4 -888 CLER : Gio) ears BY: LEAK a TRE COupy Attomeys for biaintift Ooputy Cae SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED CIVIL JURISDICTION RUSSELL BRIMER, Case No. CGC-10-505320 Plaintiff, ] ORDER APPROVING v. PROPOSITION 65 SETTLEMENT AND CONSENT JUDGMENT FPC CORPGRATION; and DOES 1-150, Date: April 11, 2011 inclusive, Time: 9:30 a.m. i Dept: 301 Defendants. Judge: Peter Busch Action Filed: November 10, 2010co Oo ND WA BR WN Se See Be Re em Se Aw PB Ww HY | S Dated: jhe parties and attached to the Judgment as Exhibit 1. After consideration of the papers i the arguments presented, the Court finds that the terms of the settlement set forth in the Jment meets the criteria established by California Heaith & Safety Code section 25249.7, based on the criteria set forth in Health & Safety Code § 25249.7(b)(2), any civil | penalty required by the consent judgment Consent Judgment is reasonable. LORETTA M. GIORGI iRDER APPROVING PROPOSITION 65 SETTLEMENT AND CONSENT JUDGMENT