On April 02, 2010 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Smith, Karen,
Smith, Warren,
and
City And County Of San Francisco,
Does 1 Through 100,
Gray, Henry,
for PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - NON-VEHICLE RELATED
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
DN
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
May-17-2010 10:38 am
Case Number: CGC-10-498328
Filing Date: May-14-2010 10:37
Juke Box: 001 Image: 028520271
ORDER
WARREN SMITH et al VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al
001002852021
Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned., RECD WAY 04 2010 |
10
~
we wal
DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669
City Attomey
JOANNE HOPPER, State Bar #114961 rior Cl
Chief Trial Attorney gan Francisco County Supe
JAMES F. HANNAWALT, State Bar #139657 10
Deputy City Attorney may 14 20
Fox Plaza
1390 Market Street, Sixth Floor CLERK THE COURT
San Francisco, California 94102-5408 . fark
Telephone: (415) 554-3913 BY Sr ba
Facsimile: (415) 554-3837
E-Mail: james.hannawalt@sfgov.org
ourt
Attomeys for Defendant
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
UNLIMITED JURISDICTION
WARREN SMITH and KAREN SMITH, Case No. CGC-10-498328
Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING SECOND APPLICATION
FOR EXTENSION TO FILE RESPONSIVE
vs. PLEADING AND-EXEDPTON-EROALGCASE
MANAGCEMENE-GUDEEINES- te F-/7-10
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, HENRY GRAY, and DOES
ONE through ONE-HUNDRED, Place: Dept, 212
Commissioner Arlene T. Borick
Defendants.
Date Action Filed: April 2, 2010
Trial Date: — None Set
Attached Documents: [Application for Order
Granting Extension to File Responsive Pleading and
Exemption from Case Management Guidelines;
Declaration of JamesF. Hannawalt in Support
Thereof]
Having come on by Application, and having considered the application and supporting
declaration,
1
PROPOSED Order on 2â„¢ Application to Extend Time to Respond- CASE NO. 10-498-328 nALP20104101 13040062691 5.docIT IS ORDERED the City and County of San Francisco (City) is granted an extension of time
to file a responsive pleading in the above-captioned case arising from the July 18, 2009 Muni LRV
9-13-10»
collision at West Portal Station in San Francisco (West Portal Collision).
Cle T. Bouck
ARLENE T. BORICK fe °
COMMISSIONER OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
Dated: May tf , 2010
ARLENE T. BORICK
Jucge Pro Tempore
2
PROPOSED Order on 2" Application to Extend Time to Respond- CASE NO. 10-498-328 nMiti2010\101 130:0062691 5.docPROOF OF SERVICE
I, MARY MARTIN, declare as follows:
lam a citizen of the United States, over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the above-
4 || entitled action. Tam employed at the City Attorney’s Office of San Francisco, Fox Plaza Building,
1390 Market Street, Sixth Floor, San Francisco, CA 94102.
5 On May 4, 2010, I served the following document(s):
6 ORDER GRANTING SECOND APPLICATION FOR ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION TO
7 || FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING AND EXEMPTION FROM CASE MANAGEMENT
GUIDELINES
8
9 on the following persons at the locations specified:
Khaldoun A. Baghdadi, Esq.
10 || Doris Cheng, Esq.
WALKUP, MELODIA, KELLY &
11 || SCHOENBERGER
650 California Street, 26" Floor
12 || San Francisco, CA 94108-2615
Tel: (415) 981-7210
13 || Fax: (415) 391-6965
14 || in the manner indicated below:
15 El BY UNITED STATES MAIL. Following ordinary business practices, I sealed true and correct copies of
the above documents in addressed envelope(s) and placed them at my workplace for collection and mailing with
16 the United States Postal Service. I am readily familiar with the practices of the San Francisco City Attorney's
Office for collecting and processing mail. In the ordinary course of business, the sealed envelope(s) that I placed
7 for collection would be deposited, postage prepaid, with the United States Postal Service that same day.
18 oO BY PERSONAL SERVICE: I sealed true and correct copies of the above documents in addressed
envelope(s) and caused such envelope(s) to be delivered by hand at the above locations by a professional
19 messenger service. A declaration from the messenger who made the delivery [_] is attached or [] will be
filed separately with the court.
20
oO BY FACSIMILE: Based on a written agreement of the parties to accept service by fax, I transmitted true and
21 correct copies of the above document(s) via a facsimile machine at telephone number (415) 554-3837 to the
persons and the fax numbers listed above. The fax transmission was reported as complete and without error. The
22 transmission report was properly issued by the transmitting facsimile machine, and a copy of the transmission
report [] is attached or [_] will be filed separately with the court.
I declare under penalty of perjury pursuant to the laws of the State of California that the
24 || foregoing is true and correct. Executed May 4, 2010, at San Frapcisco, California.
~
25 “Dew, -—~
eh
3
PROPOSED Order on 2"! Application to Extend Time to Respond- CASE NO. 10-498-328 DANH2010\101 13010062691 5.doc
Document Filed Date
May 14, 2010
Case Filing Date
April 02, 2010
Category
PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - NON-VEHICLE RELATED
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.