arrow left
arrow right
  • AQUA FINANCE INC Vs. KAREN MASTRO CONTRACTS AND INDEBTEDNESS - COUNTY document preview
  • AQUA FINANCE INC Vs. KAREN MASTRO CONTRACTS AND INDEBTEDNESS - COUNTY document preview
  • AQUA FINANCE INC Vs. KAREN MASTRO CONTRACTS AND INDEBTEDNESS - COUNTY document preview
  • AQUA FINANCE INC Vs. KAREN MASTRO CONTRACTS AND INDEBTEDNESS - COUNTY document preview
						
                                

Preview

Filing # 68137909 E-Filed 02/19/2018 01:32:53 PM IN THE COUNTY COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA AQUA FINANCE INC, Plaintiff, vs. Case Number: 16-CC-009601 KAREN MASTRO, Defendant. / DEFENDANT’S ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES COMES NOW the Defendant, KAREN MASTRO, by and through undersigned counsel, pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.110 and hereby answers Plaintiff” s Complaint for Damages and raises the following affirmative defenses. In support Defendant states as follows: ANSWER 1. Admitted for jurisdictional purposes only. 2. Admitted. 3. Denied, specifically Plaintiff has failed to attach the “sales slip” which Plaintiff has admitted is a material part of the contract. E: Page 2 of Exhibit to Plaintiff” s Complaint. Plaintiff’ s attachment states in bold all caps letters on the second page, “is a part of and in accordance with the terms of [the] revolving credit agreement, which contains the federal truth- in-lending disclosure, payment terms, and other important information about your account with us.” Without such terms it isimpossible for Defendant to have shown any compliance with potential unknown conditions precedent. E: Page 2 of Exhibit to Plaintiff” s Complaint. -1- ***ELECTRONICALLY FILED 02/19/2018 01:32:53 PM: KEN BURKE, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, PINELLAS COUNTY*** 4. Denied, the copy attached to the complaint is incomplete and does contain the “sales slip”. The agreement istherefore incomplete. E: Page 2 of Exhibit to Plaintiff’ s Complaint. 5. Denied. 6. Denied. Defendant denies that Plaintiff is entitled to any relief. AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 7. First Affirmative Defenses — Failure to State a Cause of Action. Plaintiff has failed to state a cause of action for breach of contract. WHEREFORE, Defendant KAREN MASTRO, prays that this Honorable Court will dismiss Plaintiff’ s Complaint for Damages with Prejudice, award Defendant court costs and attorney fees if so entitled, and grant any other relief deemed just and proper. /s/ Vincent Carl LoBue Vincent Carl LoBue Florida Bar Number: 0064368 PO. Box 707 St. Petersburg, Florida 33731-0707 Phone: (727) 501—5455 LoBueLaw@gmail.com Attorney for Defendant CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been served on Hayt, Hayt & Landau P.L., attorney for Plaintiff on this that on this 19th day of February, 2018 Via electronic service through the e-filing portal. /s/Vincent C. LoBue Vincent Carl LoBue