On May 31, 2011 a
Judgment
was filed
involving a dispute between
Mountain Lion Acquisitions, Llc,
and
Does 1 Through 10, Inclusive,
Wilson, Ayafemi T,
for EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740)
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
Oa
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
May-16-2012 7:40 am
Case Number: CGC-11-512869
Filing Date: Apr-16-2012 7:38
Filed by: VANESSA WU
Juke Box: 001 Image: 03616771
COST BILL
MOUNTAIN LION ACQUISITIONS, LLC VS. AYAFEMI T WILSON et al
001C03616771
Instructions:
Piease place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.MC-012
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY — Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY
D. SCOTT CARRUTHERS (State Bar #68745)
|_ Law Office of D. Scott Carruthers
8448 Katella Avenue/ P.O, Box 228
Stanton CA, 90680
ki
TELEPHONE NO. 71 4.76 1.3976 FAX NO. San Francisan Counts Searing Care
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): ITIONS IN .
NAME OF COURT: SAN FRANCISCO. APR 1b 201 L
street appress; 400 MCALLISTER STREET, RM 103
ULEHK ur t VUUT
MAILING ADDRESS:
cry anoziecone; SAN FRANCISCO CA, 94102 By: Tannin Alor
BRANCHNAME. CENTRAL
PLAINTIFF:
MOUNTAIN LION ACQUISITIONS, INC.
DEFENDANT: 4 yAFEMI T WILSON
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS AFTER JUDGMENT, ACKNOWLEDGMENT "EGCALIL 512869
OF CREDIT, AND DECLARATION OF ACCRUED INTEREST
. I claim the following costs after judgment incurred within the last two years (indicate if there
are multiple items in any category): Dates Incurred Amount
a {Preparing and issuing abstract of judgment $0.00
lb JRecording and indexing abstract of judgment $0.00
ic {Filing notice of judgment lien on personal property iS
ld }issuing writ of execution, to extent not satisfied by Code Civ. Proc., § 685.050 i$ 0.00
(specify county):
le |Levying officers fees, to extent not satisfied by Code Civ. Proc., § 685.050 or wage I$ 0.00
garnishment
if JApproved fee on application for order for appearance of judgment debtor, or other iS
japproved costs under Code Civ. Proc., § 708.110 et seq.
1g fAttomey fees, if allowed by Code Civ. Proc., § 685.040 rs
h_fOther: (Statute authorizing cost): $ 0.00
i [Totat of claimed costs for current memorandum of costs (add items a-h) $0.00
2. Ali previously allowed postjudgment cost:
3. Total of all postiudgment costs (add items 1 and 2): .. TOTAL
4. Acknowledgment of Credit. | acknowledge total credit to date (including returns on levy process and direct payments) in the
amount of: E 0.00
5. Declaration of Accrued Interest. Interest on the judgment accruing at the legal rate from the date of entry on balances due after
partial satisfactions and other credits in the amount of: '$ 101.68
6. lamthe [=] judgment creditor [7] agent for the judgment creditor {%7] attorney for the judgment creditor.
| have knowledge of the facts conceming the costs claimed above. To the best of my knowledge and belief, the costs claimed are
correct, reasonable, and necessary, and have not been satisfied.
| declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoi
Date: April 13, 2012
D.SCOTT CARRUTHERS »
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME }
f LL
WE,
NOTICE TO THE JUDGMENT DEBTOR
If this memorandum of costs is filed at the same time as an application for a writ of execution, any statutory costs, not exceeding
$100 in aggregate and not atready allowed by the court, may be included in the writ of execution. The fees sought under this
memorandum may be disallowed by the court upon a motion to fax filed by the debtor, notwithstanding the fees having been
included in the writ of execution. (Code Civ. Proc., § 685.070(e).) A motion to tax costs claimed in this memorandum must be filed
within 10 days after service of the memorandum. (Code Civ. Proc., § 685.070(c).)
(Proof of service on reverse)
Form Adopted for Mandatry Use MIEFMORANDUM OF COSTS AFTER JUDGMENT, ACKNOWLEDGMENT Code of Cru! Procedure
“Indicial Council of California.isi | GANYDOV 4O NOLLVYV193d GNV ‘Lida:
omy oBed ANSW9d37 MOV ‘LNAWOCAr YaLld¥ SLSOD 40 WN jOWAIN {bb0z" Amnusr ‘seul 210-00
UNVeW1030 40 2UNLYNOIS) (SWN INId YO 3dAD)
4 TIAMMUVOOW VSSRIVO
> Z402 ‘Eb Indy :a1eq
“pauoo pue anuj si BuloBe0y ayy JeUp ELLIOJED JO BeIS OU} JO SMe] OU) JepuN AINfied Jo Ayeuad Jepun aiE—ap |
:pasanyap aul, (p)
:peranyap eq (¢)
‘pasenyep a1aym sseuppy (2)
:panuas uosiad jo ewen (L)
:SMO]|O} Se Adoo & paJaAyep Ajjeuosad | ‘Auealjep jeuosued oO ‘q
2D UdyURlS -(a7e}s pue Ayo) Buyyeuu Jo e0e|q (P)
Z10z ‘e} Wy :Buyeu jo ajeq (0)
LELb6 ‘WO cosibueL4 UES
0.# UC SNIW 0109 Z :edojenus uo ssauppy (q)
NOS1IM L INAVAV :panies uosied jo owen (2)
:SMoO}[O} SE PayleW pue pesseuppe sem odojaaua ay, (Z)
“predaud Anny eBeysod
um edojeaua peyeas & Ul BdIAIag IeIS0q SA8}e}S PavIUN ey) UM SsauIsng jo asinoo AYeuIp1o ayy u! peysodep
1} }! ‘Bumjeu pue uolpa|[oo so) pased s| souepuodsauco yeu) Aep owes oy) uO ‘Gullew 40, souapucdsasioo
Buissacqid pue Gujoayjoo 10} aoqueud s,ssoujsng Siu) YIM Jewey Atpeer we | ‘serqoeid scaulsng Areulpio ino
Buimoy|o} Moj9q SUA}! Ul UMOYS eoz/d ey} Je PU d}eEp Sy] LO Suljlew pue UONdaO9 10, adojeaus ay) pase{d cm (q)
‘pledaid Ajiny eGeysod ayy ym eovuas eysod S8}EIS PaIUN Su} YIM adojanue pa[ess a4) peysodep @)
GNy adojaaue ue ul Adoo e pi 121 (L)
“paunsoo Buljew oy) aay Ayunoo ay} u! peAojdwie Jo jo Juspised e We | “EW CI e
1(@.40 8 sa4}13 d9;ALUU0D) SMO||O} SB jSarazU; parugoy
Jo uoneeDeg pue ‘ypain jo jueWibpemouyoy ‘JUeubpnr Jayy s}S00 Jo winpuesowey ayy Jo Adod e paleAlep Aljeuosied Jo payew | “E
08906 “YO uolEIS
87Z XO" ‘O'd /onUaAY EI[AIEY Shs
{Ajeds) $| ssouppe ssauisng Jo aouapiseu AW “7
-uooe e691 Siu} oy Aped e JOU pue aBe Jo suead g] 1SBE] Je SEM | BNUAS JO SU OU TY “LE
asiaieg jeuosieg [_] ew bc
SOIANaS 40 JOOUd
NOSLM LL LNaAVAV
698Z1S-11-OD9 SA
2w3EWNN 3SvO “ONI‘SNOLLISINOOV NOT NIVLNNOW ‘SUL LYOHS
Document Filed Date
April 16, 2012
Case Filing Date
May 31, 2011
Category
EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.