arrow left
arrow right
  • PREXUS HEALTH CONSULTANTS LLC vs. UNIVERSITY GENERAL HOSPITAL SYSTEMS LLP (FKA UNIVE BREACH OF CONTRACT document preview
  • PREXUS HEALTH CONSULTANTS LLC vs. UNIVERSITY GENERAL HOSPITAL SYSTEMS LLP (FKA UNIVE BREACH OF CONTRACT document preview
  • PREXUS HEALTH CONSULTANTS LLC vs. UNIVERSITY GENERAL HOSPITAL SYSTEMS LLP (FKA UNIVE BREACH OF CONTRACT document preview
  • PREXUS HEALTH CONSULTANTS LLC vs. UNIVERSITY GENERAL HOSPITAL SYSTEMS LLP (FKA UNIVE BREACH OF CONTRACT document preview
  • PREXUS HEALTH CONSULTANTS LLC vs. UNIVERSITY GENERAL HOSPITAL SYSTEMS LLP (FKA UNIVE BREACH OF CONTRACT document preview
  • PREXUS HEALTH CONSULTANTS LLC vs. UNIVERSITY GENERAL HOSPITAL SYSTEMS LLP (FKA UNIVE BREACH OF CONTRACT document preview
  • PREXUS HEALTH CONSULTANTS LLC vs. UNIVERSITY GENERAL HOSPITAL SYSTEMS LLP (FKA UNIVE BREACH OF CONTRACT document preview
  • PREXUS HEALTH CONSULTANTS LLC vs. UNIVERSITY GENERAL HOSPITAL SYSTEMS LLP (FKA UNIVE BREACH OF CONTRACT document preview
						
                                

Preview

Filed 11 J anuary 25 P5:37 Chris Daniel - District Clerk Harris Coun! ED101) 016150176 By: Sandra Talbert Cause No. 2009-77474 PREXUS HEALTH CONSULTANTS, LLC IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff, Vv. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS UNIVERSITY GENERAL HOSPITAL SYSTEMS, LLP ffk/a UNIVERSITY GENERAL HOSPITAL, LP. and ASCENSION PHYSICIAN SOLUTIONS, LLC Defendants. 270" JUDICIAL DISTRICT DEFENDANT LUXXUS HEALTH SYSTEMS, LLC’S TRADITIONAL AND NO-EVIDENCE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO THE HONORABLE COURT: Defendant Luxxus Health Systems, LLC (“Luxxus”) moves for summary judgment on the claims asserted it by Plaintiffs Prexus Health Consultants, LLC (“Prexus”) and Prexus Health, LLC (“Prexus Health”) under Rules 166a and 166a(i) of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. INTRODUCTION Prexus sues Luxxus for its alleged interference with two agreements under which Prexus undertook to (but did not) perform the management and administrative functions of the University General Hospital. This claim fails as a matter of law and of no-evidence. Prexus Health appears to state the same claim on the same basis. This claim fails on the same grounds. SUMMARY JUDGMENT EVIDENCE Luxxus attaches the following as summary judgment evidence: A. Affidavit of Kelly Riedel. 1 August 6, 2009 Notice of Material Breach of Professional Services Agreement and Consulting Services Agreement.