On January 11, 2012 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Berger, Bruce James,
Churchill, Kevin D,
Franco, Charles C,
Leach, Edward,
Patrick, Charles A.,
West Iii, William,
Wright, Mark,
and
Amec Construction Management, Inc,
Amec Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc.,
California Department Of Transportation,
Amec Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc,
The State Of California, Department Of,
for civil
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
Ur
6
ie
JEANNE SCHERER, Chief Counsel
LAUREN A. MACHADO, Deputy Chief Counsel
JOANN GEORGALLIS, Assistant Chief Counsel
ALEKSANDRA SACHOWICZ, Deputy Attorney, Bar No. 169597
ELECTRONICALLY
FILED
Superior Court of California,
County of San Francisco
Aleksandra.Sachowicz@dot.ca.gov
1120 N Street (MS 57) P.O. Box 1438
Sacramento, California 95812-1438
Telephone: (916) 654-2630
Facsimile: (916) 654-6128
Attorneys for Defendant/Respondent California
Department of Transportation
09/28/2016
Clerk of the Court
BY:MADONNA CARANTO
Deputy Clerk
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA:
FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
BRUCE JAMES BERGER; KEVIN D.
CHURCHILL; CHARLES C. FRANCO;
EDWARD LEACH; WILLIAM WEST, III;
MARK WRIGHT, and CHARLES A.
PATRICK,
Plaintiffs/Petitioners,
v.
AMEC CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT,
INC.; AMEC ENVIRONMENTAL &
INFRASTRUCTURE, INC. and
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION,
Defendants/Respondents.
Case No. CPF-12-511817
DECLARATION OF ALEKSANDRA
SACHOWICZ IN SUPPORT OF
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT STATE OF
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION’S OPPOSITION TO
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT
Complaint Filed January 11, 2012
Trial: December 12, 2016
1. Tam an attorney at law, licensed to practice before all courts in the State of California. I
am employed as Caltrans Deputy Attorney IV in the Legal Division of the California
Department of Transportation (Caltrans) at 1120 N Street, Sacramento, CA.
2. I became the attorney of record in this case in July of 2016. I took over the
representation of Caltrans from attorneys Alice Ramsey and Richard Mitchell. Alice
Ramsey retired in 2015.
/t/
“DECLARATION OF ALEKSANDRA SACHOWICZ IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT STATE OF
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S LEAVE TO FILE A
SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT3. After I took over the case | familiarized myself with the contents of the pleadings and
correspondence exchanged to date. I also contacted the plaintiffs’ attorney, Alan Davis,
and the co-defendant’s attorney, Robert Roginson to discuss the case and learn what I
potentially may not have gleaned from studying the contents of the file.
4. Thad a conversation with Mr. Alan Davis in July of 2016 wherein he referenced
settlement discussions brokered by Alice Ramsey. I told him I was aware of the
correspondence on the issue and that I did not see any evidence that a settlement
agreement was reached on-any terms:-l-asked-Mr: Davis outright if he believed that there
was a valid, enforceable settlement agreement between Caltrans and the plaintiffs and/or
the plaintiffs and Amec. Mr. Davis expressly and explicitly said to me that there was no
enforceable settlement agreement.
5. In my subsequent conversations with Mr. Davis he kept alluding to the existence of a
binding settlement “agreement with” and/or “commitment from” Alice Ramsey. I made it
clear that if he believed there was an enforceable settlement agreement, he should send
me a letter stating its terms and evidence of same and that I would be willing to honor it.
He never provided me with any such document and in fact, in our conversations, kept
referring to the fact that the settkement amount was never discussed with specificity or
agreed upon. In fact, Mr. Davis said he was in no position to commit to a settlement
figure because he was not even aware of what the value of his clients’ claims were. He
stated that he lacked sufficient payroll records from his clients and/or Amec to ascertain
what they were paid and what they could be owing if prevailing wage rates had been
applicable. I informed Mr. Davis that the records Caltrans had in its possession from
Amec were too inadequate to ascertain what the plaintiffs were actually paid. In our
conversations in August and September of 2016 Mr. Davis kept inviting me to arrive at a
settlement offer based on Caltrans’ estimates and assumptions about what may be owed
to the plaintiffs and kept saying he was inclined to enter into a settlement agreement in
the 60 to 70 thousand dollar range. 1, in turn, was negotiating with Amec’s attorney to
fff
2 ct J
DECLARATION OF ALEKSANDRA SACHOWICZ IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT STATE OF
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S LEAVE TO FILE A
SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINTw
6
effectuate a waiver of Amec’s indemnity claims against Caltrans.
6. On July 14, 2016, I sent a letter to both Mr. Davis and co-defendant’s attorney Robert
Roginson setting forth the Caltrans position regarding a potential settlement. A true and
correct copy of said letter is attached to the plaintiff's Ex Parte Application as an exhibit.
I wanted to ensure that both parties understood that Caltrans has no liability in this case
and that it has no intention of paying any money in furtherance of the settlement. I urged
the parties to bring the case to trial so that we may finally have a resolution and | offered
to-work- cooperatively with both sides:
7. To date, I have been served with one set of Requests for Production of Documents calling]
for the production of the plaintiffs’ employment records. There was an identical set of
requests served on Amec. No depositions were taken to date. The first deposition is
scheduled for October 25, 2016.
I declare under the penalty of perjury that the foll owing fs true and correct. Executed this 28"
Dr.QWUe-
KEEKSANDR TOWICE 4
eclarant
day of September 2016 at Sacramento, California. / | {
VY |
}
(
\
DECLARATION OF ALEKSANDR CHOWICZ IN ‘SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT STATE OF
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S LEAVE TO FILE A
SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT
Document Filed Date
September 28, 2016
Case Filing Date
January 11, 2012
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.