arrow left
arrow right
  • LEONID GONCHAROV et al VS. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al BUSINESS TORT document preview
  • LEONID GONCHAROV et al VS. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al BUSINESS TORT document preview
  • LEONID GONCHAROV et al VS. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al BUSINESS TORT document preview
  • LEONID GONCHAROV et al VS. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al BUSINESS TORT document preview
  • LEONID GONCHAROV et al VS. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al BUSINESS TORT document preview
  • LEONID GONCHAROV et al VS. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al BUSINESS TORT document preview
  • LEONID GONCHAROV et al VS. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al BUSINESS TORT document preview
  • LEONID GONCHAROV et al VS. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al BUSINESS TORT document preview
						
                                

Preview

23 24 THE BRANDI LAW FIRM THOMAS J. BRANDI #53208 JASON B. FRIEDMAN #277888 354 Pine Street, Third Floor ELECTRONICALLY San Francisco, CA 94104 FILED Telephone: (415) 989-1800 ecole ions maior Facsimile: (415) 707-2024 08/11/2016 Email: tib@brandilaw.com 08 /: of £2 Court BY-MELISSA DONG Deputy Clerk GARY P. OSWALD, ESQ. #52682 LAW OFFICES OF GARY P. OSWALD 100 Tamal Plaza, Suite 140 Corte Madera, California 94925 Telephone: (415) 927-5700 Facsimile: (415) 927-5705 Attorneys for Plaintiffs COURT OF UNLIMITED JURISDICTION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO LEONID GONCHAROV; MOHAMMED. [Case No.: CGC-12-526017 EDDINE; ALAN FREBERG; TREVOR. JOHNSON; PETER KIRBY; and JEREMY |cy ass ACTION WATT individually and on behalf of all eet others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF APPEAL vs. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and DOES |Complaint filed November 9, 2012 1 through 50, inclusive Defendants. TO THE CLERK OF THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, AND TO ALL PARTIES OF RECORD: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Plaintiffs Leonid Goncharov; Mohammed Eddine; Alan Freberg; Trevor Johnson; Peter Kirby; and Jeremy Watt (“Plaintiffs) hereby appeal to the Court of 1 PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF APPEAL23 24 Appeal of the State of California, First Appellate District, from the Order of Judgment by Department 305 (The Honorable Mary E. Wiss) and all other orders, decisions and hearings of the Court that form the basis of that Order, including the Order Sustaining Defendant’s Demurrer to Second Amended Complaint entered on April 8, 2016. Notice of Entry of Judgment was electronically served by the Clerk on June 23, 2016. Dated: August 11, 2016 Ito THE BRANDI LAW FIRM ao pore : By: NI oa og, THOMAS J. BRANDI JASON B. FRIEDMAN Attorneys for Plaintiffs PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF APPEAL23 24 Leonid Goncharov, et. al. v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et. al. San Francisco Superior Court Case No.: CGC-12-526017 PROOF OF SERVICE — ELECTRONIC SERVICE The undersigned certifies and declares as follows: Tam over the age of eighteen years and not a party to this action. My business address is 354 Pine Street, Third Floor, San Francisco, California, 94104. On August 11, 2016, I electronically served the document(s) via LexisNexis File & Serve X-press described as: PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF APPEAL on the recipients designated on the Transaction Receipt located on the File & Serve Xpress website on and Serve Xpress website, at the email address(es) specified: John B. Quinn, Esq. Stephen A. Swedlow, Esq, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP 865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor 500 West Madison Street, Suite 2450 Los Angeles, CA 90017-2543 Chicago, Illinois 60661 johnquinn@quinnemanuel.com stephenswedlow@quinnemanuel.com aleclevy@quinnemanuel.com Arthur Roberts, Esq. Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP Gary Oswald, Esq. 50 California Street, 22nd Floor Law Offices of Gary Oswald San Francisco, California 94111 2350 Marinship Way, Suite 12 arthurroberts@quinnemanuel.com Sausalito, CA 94965 aryoswald@goswaldlegal.net I certify and declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated: August 11,2016 AWM kewl 4) dehurott MICHAEL SCHIRALDI PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF APPEAL23 24 PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL - CCP §1013a(3) The undersigned certifies and declares as follows: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to this action. My business address is 354 Pine Street, Third Floor, San Francisco, California, 94104, located in the county where the mailing described below took place. Tam readily familiar with the business practice at my place of business for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service. Correspondence so collected and processed is deposited with the United States Postal Service that same day in the ordinary course of business. On August 11, 2016, at my place of business at San Francisco, California, copies of the following document: PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF APPEAL were placed for deposit in the United States Postal Service in sealed envelopes with postage fully prepaid, addressed to the following named parties: John B. Quinn, Esq. Stephen A. Swedlow, Esq. Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP 865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor 500 West Madison Street, Suite 2450 Los Angeles, CA 90017-2543 Chicago, Illinois 60661 Arthur Roberts, Esq. Gary Oswald, Esq. Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP Law Offices of Gary Oswald 50 California Street, 22nd Floor 2350 Marinship Way, Suite 12 San Francisco, California 94111 Sausalito, CA 94965 and the envelopes so addressed were placed for collection and mailing on the above date following ordinary business practices. I certify and declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated: August 11, 2016 WMehork v. deburotde MICHAEL SCHIRALDI PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF APPEAL