On August 02, 2012 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Barnum, Terrence,
and
Does 1 To 20, Incl.,
Heelan, Peter,
Paul Ryan Associates Inc.,,
Paul Ryan Associates, Inc.,
for civil
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
MUNA
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Mar-06-2013 7:59 pm
Case Number: CGC-12-522893
Filing Date: Mar-04-2013 7:59
Filed by: JACQUELINE ALAMEDA
Juke Box: 001 Image: 03969551
ORDER
TERRENCE BARNUM VS. PAUL RYAN ASSOCIATES INC., et al
001C03969551
Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.Lynch, Gilad
& Grummer
A Professional
on
170 Cotumbes
Avenue,
Fin Floor
San Francine, CA
sai33,
Ph (sis) 397-2800
Fax (415) 397.0937
Cm YD HA KR WwW YY
N NN NN Be Be we Be Be we we eRe eK
& FB SBS SERS E BEES
26
27
28
William A. Bogdan (SBN 124321)
Julie L. Fieber (SBN 202857)
LYNCH, GILARDI & GRUMMER
A Professional Corporation
170 Columbus Avenue, Suite 500
San Francisco, California 94133
sy tld,
Telephone: (415) 397-2800
MAR 04 2013
Facsimile: (415) 397-0937
CLERK OF THF COURT
BY: oe
Email: wbogdan@lgglaw.com Deputy Clerk
Attorneys for Plaintiff
TERRENCE BARNUM
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
UNLIMITED JURISDICTION
TERRENCE BARNUM, Case No.: CGC-12-522893
Plaintiff, DISCOVERY
vs. eee] ORDER DENYING
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
PAUL RYAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PROTECTIVE ORDER, SANCTIONS AND
aka Ryan Associates, a California FOR STAY OF PROCEEDINGS
corporation; PETER HEELAN; and
DOES 1-20, inclusive, Date: March 4, 2013
Time: 9:00 a.m.
Defendant(s). Dept.: 302
Complaint: August 2, 2012
Trial Date: None set
Defendant Paul Ryan Associates, Inc.’s Motion for Protective Order, Sanctions, and Stay of
Proceedings came on for hearing on March 4, 2013 at 9:00 am. in Department 302 of the above-
entitled Court. Appearances were as noted on the record.
After full consideration of the moving papers, opposition papers, reply papers, and any
arguments made by counsel at the hearing, and for good cause appearing:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED IN ITS ENTIRETY.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: d1A¢L3
Ya 7ev_Judge of the Superior Court
1 x therliae
[#RSPOSED] ORDER DENYING DEF.’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER, SANCTIONS, AND STAY
Document Filed Date
March 04, 2013
Case Filing Date
August 02, 2012
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
MUNA SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Mar-06-2013 7:59 pm Case Number: CGC-12-522893 Filing Date: Mar-04-2013 7:59 Filed by: JACQUELINE ALAMEDA Juke Box: 001 Image: 03969551 ORDER TERRENCE BARNUM VS. PAUL RYAN ASSOCIATES INC., et al 001C03969551 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.Lynch, Gilad & Grummer A Professional on 170 Cotumbes Avenue, Fin Floor San Francine, CA sai33, Ph (sis) 397-2800 Fax (415) 397.0937 Cm YD HA KR WwW YY N NN NN Be Be we Be Be we we eRe eK & FB SBS SERS E BEES 26 27 28 William A. Bogdan (SBN 124321) Julie L. Fieber (SBN 202857) LYNCH, GILARDI & GRUMMER A Professional Corporation 170 Columbus Avenue, Suite 500 San Francisco, California 94133 sy tld, Telephone: (415) 397-2800 MAR 04 2013 Facsimile: (415) 397-0937 CLERK OF THF COURT BY: oe Email: wbogdan@lgglaw.com Deputy Clerk Attorneys for Plaintiff TERRENCE BARNUM IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION TERRENCE BARNUM, Case No.: CGC-12-522893 Plaintiff, DISCOVERY vs. eee] ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PAUL RYAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PROTECTIVE ORDER, SANCTIONS AND aka Ryan Associates, a California FOR STAY OF PROCEEDINGS corporation; PETER HEELAN; and DOES 1-20, inclusive, Date: March 4, 2013 Time: 9:00 a.m. Defendant(s). Dept.: 302 Complaint: August 2, 2012 Trial Date: None set Defendant Paul Ryan Associates, Inc.’s Motion for Protective Order, Sanctions, and Stay of Proceedings came on for hearing on March 4, 2013 at 9:00 am. in Department 302 of the above- entitled Court. Appearances were as noted on the record. After full consideration of the moving papers, opposition papers, reply papers, and any arguments made by counsel at the hearing, and for good cause appearing: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED IN ITS ENTIRETY. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: d1A¢L3 Ya 7ev_Judge of the Superior Court 1 x therliae [#RSPOSED] ORDER DENYING DEF.’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER, SANCTIONS, AND STAY