On September 27, 2007 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx,
Xxxxx Xxxxxxx,
and
Arun Ravidran,
for civil
in the District Court of Santa Clara County.
Preview
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Time: 9:00 a.m.
Dept.:
Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Adjudication in xxxxxxx v. Ravindran, et al.
-1- CV287890
This opposition will be based upon the records of the court, the court file, the memora
dum of points and authorities, transcripts, and declarations herein, and upon other evidence pr
sented at the hearing.
ated: September 25 LAW OFFICE OF ASIT PANWALA
Asit Panwala, Esq.
Attorney for Plaintiffs xxxxx xxxxxxx,
ESTATE OF NATVARLAL xxxxxxx,
xxxxxx xxxxxxx, and xxxxxx
xxxxxxx
Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Adjudication in xxxxxxx v. Ravindran, et al.
CV287890
Document Filed Date
September 26, 2018
Case Filing Date
September 27, 2007
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Time: 9:00 a.m. Dept.: Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Adjudication in xxxxxxx v. Ravindran, et al. -1- CV287890 This opposition will be based upon the records of the court, the court file, the memora dum of points and authorities, transcripts, and declarations herein, and upon other evidence pr sented at the hearing. ated: September 25 LAW OFFICE OF ASIT PANWALA Asit Panwala, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiffs xxxxx xxxxxxx, ESTATE OF NATVARLAL xxxxxxx, xxxxxx xxxxxxx, and xxxxxx xxxxxxx Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Adjudication in xxxxxxx v. Ravindran, et al. CV287890