arrow left
arrow right
  • R. xxxxxxx, et al vs A. Ravidran Auto Unlimited (22)  document preview
  • R. xxxxxxx, et al vs A. Ravidran Auto Unlimited (22)  document preview
  • R. xxxxxxx, et al vs A. Ravidran Auto Unlimited (22)  document preview
  • R. xxxxxxx, et al vs A. Ravidran Auto Unlimited (22)  document preview
  • R. xxxxxxx, et al vs A. Ravidran Auto Unlimited (22)  document preview
  • R. xxxxxxx, et al vs A. Ravidran Auto Unlimited (22)  document preview
  • R. xxxxxxx, et al vs A. Ravidran Auto Unlimited (22)  document preview
  • R. xxxxxxx, et al vs A. Ravidran Auto Unlimited (22)  document preview
						
                                

Preview

MichaelF. Brown, Esq. (Bar No. 164593) LAW OFFICE OF ICHAEL F. BROWN 2010 Crow Canyon Place, Suite 100 San Ramon, California 94583 Telephone: (925) 824-3101 Attorneys for Defendant, ARUN RAVIDRAN SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 10 il xxxxx xxxxxxx, as an individual CASE NO. 115CV287890 and successor in interest on behalf of the 12 estate of NATVARLAL xxxxxxx, OBJECTION AND OPPOSITION TO xxxxxx xxxxxxx, as an individual, PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION IN LIMINE 7 13 and xxxxxx xxxxxxx, as an individual, 14 Trial Date: April 23, 2019 Plaintiffs, Trial Time: 8:30 a.m. 13 Trial Dept.: 7 vs. 16 ARUN RAVIDRAN, an individual, and 17 DOES | through 25, 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 Defendant hereby objects to and opposes plaintiffs’ motion in limine as it is in 22 violation of CRC 3.1110, et seq. and as such should not, respectfully, be before the Court. 23 24 Defendant further opposes plaintiffs’ motion in limine on the grounds that it lacks 25 legal authority or is contrary to California law and as such plaintiffs provide no legal basis 26 for it to be granted. 27 OBJECTION AND OPPOSITION TO PUAINTIFFS? MOTION IN LIMINE 7 28