arrow left
arrow right
  • R. xxxxxxx, et al vs A. Ravidran Auto Unlimited (22)  document preview
  • R. xxxxxxx, et al vs A. Ravidran Auto Unlimited (22)  document preview
  • R. xxxxxxx, et al vs A. Ravidran Auto Unlimited (22)  document preview
  • R. xxxxxxx, et al vs A. Ravidran Auto Unlimited (22)  document preview
  • R. xxxxxxx, et al vs A. Ravidran Auto Unlimited (22)  document preview
  • R. xxxxxxx, et al vs A. Ravidran Auto Unlimited (22)  document preview
						
                                

Preview

Michael F. Brown, Esq. (Bar No. 164593) LAW OFFICE OF M HAEL F. BROWN 2010 Crow Canyon Place, Suite 100 San Ramon, California 94583 Telephone: (925) 824-3101 Attorneys for Defendant, ARUN VIDRAN SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 10 il xxxxx BODALLIA, as an individual CASE NO. 115CV287890 and successor in interest on behalf of the 12 estate of NATVARLAL xxxxxxx, OBJECTION AND OPPOSITION TO xxxxxx xxxxxxx, as an individual, PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS IN LIMINE 13 and xxxxxx xxxxxxx, as an individual, 14 Trial Date: April 23, 2019 Plaintiffs, Trial Time: 8:30 a.m. 15 Trial Dept.: 7 VS. 16 ARUN RAVIDRAN, an individual, and 17 DOES 1 through 25, 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 Defendant hereby objects to and opposes all of plaintiffs’ motions in limine as they 22 are all in violation of CRC 3.1110, et seq. and as such all should not, respectfully, be 23 before the Court. 24 25 Defendant further opposes plaintiffs’ motions in limine for the following reasons: 26 they all lack legal authority or are contrary to California law and as such provide no legal 27 OBJECTION AND OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS? MOTIONS IN LIMINE 28