arrow left
arrow right
  • R. xxxxxxx, et al vs A. Ravidran Auto Unlimited (22)  document preview
  • R. xxxxxxx, et al vs A. Ravidran Auto Unlimited (22)  document preview
  • R. xxxxxxx, et al vs A. Ravidran Auto Unlimited (22)  document preview
  • R. xxxxxxx, et al vs A. Ravidran Auto Unlimited (22)  document preview
  • R. xxxxxxx, et al vs A. Ravidran Auto Unlimited (22)  document preview
  • R. xxxxxxx, et al vs A. Ravidran Auto Unlimited (22)  document preview
  • R. xxxxxxx, et al vs A. Ravidran Auto Unlimited (22)  document preview
  • R. xxxxxxx, et al vs A. Ravidran Auto Unlimited (22)  document preview
						
                                

Preview

Michael F. Brown, Esq. (Bar No. 164593) LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL F. BROWN 2010 Crow Canyon Place, Suite 100 San Ramon, California 94583 Telephone: (925) 824-3101 Attorneys for Defendant, ARUN VIDRAN SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 10 11 xxxxx xxxxxxx, as an individual CASE NO. 115CV287890 and successor in interest on behalf of the 12 estate of NATVARLAL xxxxxxx, DEFENDANT’S REPLY BRIEF RE: xxxxxx xxxxxxx, as an individual, MOTION TO STRIKE OR TAX 13 and xxxxxx xxxxxxx, as an COSTS individual, 14 Plaintiffs, Hearing Date: June 28, 2019 15 Hearing Time: 10:00 a.m. VS. Hearing Dept.: 7 16 ARUN RAVIDRAN, an individual, and Trial Completed: April 30, 2019 17 DOES 1 through 25, 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 Plaintiffs provided no supporting evidence with their initial memorandum of costs, 22 which was why Defendant stated in his motion to tax that plaintiffs’ claimed costs were 23 unreasonable and not reasonably necessary to the conduct of litigation, they were merely 24 incidental or convenient or beneficial to the preparation of the litigation and they were not 25 authorized by California law. 26 DEFENDANT’S REPLY BRIEF RE: MOTION TO STRIKE OR TAX COSTS 27 28