arrow left
arrow right
  • 88 TOWNSEND STREET OWNERS ASOCIATION, VS. 699 SECOND DEVELOPMENT LLC, et al CONSTRUCTION document preview
  • 88 TOWNSEND STREET OWNERS ASOCIATION, VS. 699 SECOND DEVELOPMENT LLC, et al CONSTRUCTION document preview
  • 88 TOWNSEND STREET OWNERS ASOCIATION, VS. 699 SECOND DEVELOPMENT LLC, et al CONSTRUCTION document preview
  • 88 TOWNSEND STREET OWNERS ASOCIATION, VS. 699 SECOND DEVELOPMENT LLC, et al CONSTRUCTION document preview
  • 88 TOWNSEND STREET OWNERS ASOCIATION, VS. 699 SECOND DEVELOPMENT LLC, et al CONSTRUCTION document preview
  • 88 TOWNSEND STREET OWNERS ASOCIATION, VS. 699 SECOND DEVELOPMENT LLC, et al CONSTRUCTION document preview
						
                                

Preview

AM SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Aug-07-2014 1:04 pm Case Number: CGC-13-531203 Filing Date: Aug-07-2014 1:03 Filed by: MARIA BENIGNA GOODMAN Juke Box: 001 Image: 04578468 ORDER 88 TOWNSEND STREET OWNERS ASOCIATION, VS. 699 SECOND DEVELOPMENT LLC, et al 001004578468 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.Ceo HT DH YH Rh WY HN fee oN DAW FF YW NY = SO 19 Steve M. Cvitanovic (Bar No. 168031) Jessica M. L. Ryland (Bar No. 286724) HAIGHT BROWN & BONESTEEL LLP F Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 200 San Francisco, California 94111 San Franciseo County Superior Court ‘Telephone: 415.546.7500 Facsimile: 415.546.7505 AUG 0 7 2014 Attorneys for Defendants CLER F THE COURT 669.SECOND DEVELOPMENT, LLC & BY: ee iy Ole CANNON CONSTRUCTORS, INC. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 88 TOWNSEND STREET OWNERS Case No. CGC-13-531203 i ASSOCIATION, a California non-profit mutual benefit corporation, [PROVOSED] ORDER SUSTAINING ENERAL DEMURRER TO Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF’S EIGHTH CAUSE OF ACTION TO ITS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Hearing Type: Reservation No. 061714- Date: August 7, 2014 Time: 9:30 a.m. Dept.: 302 VS. 699 SECOND DEVELOPMENT, LLC, A California limited liability company; CANNON CONSTRUCTORS, INC., a California Corporation; Sternberg Benjamin Architects, Inc., a California corporation; Marvin Windows and Doors, a Minnesota corporation; Blomberg Building Materials dba Blomberg Window Systems, a California corporation, and DOES 1-100, 102-125, and 129=150, inclusive, Defendants. eee After considering all the papers submitted in connection with the General Demurrer to Plaintiff's Eighth Cause of Action to its Second Amended Complaint (“Demurrer”) filed by defendants 699 Second Development, LLC and Cannon Constructors, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”), and with good cause shown, this Court hereby grants the Demurrer as follows: NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Demurrer to Plaintiff's eighth cause of action for negligent misrepresentation is sustained with ten days leave to amend to permit Plaintiff an opportunity to allege with the requisite specificity facts that show how, when, where, 1 sos enoon “Case No. CGC-13-531203 irate 2_[PROPOSED] ORDER SUSTAINING DEMURRER TOto whom, and by what means the representations were made. (Lazar v. Sup. Ct. (1996) 12 Cal.4th 631, 645.) Additionally, Plaintiff must allege specific facts establishing that Defendants’ had no reasonable ground for believing the representation to be true. DATED: Oguat F 201 Wits [ws Judge of the Superior Court MARLA J, MILLER 2 Case No. CGC-13-531203 ares. [PROPOSEBLORDER SUSTAINING DEMURRER TO